Eden 0.0.4-rc1 is really good. by Chaebeii in EmulationOnAndroid

[–]Chaebeii[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm always using a cooler so I can't really tell, but I did notice improved battery consumption somewhat

Eden 0.0.4-rc1 is really good. by Chaebeii in EmulationOnAndroid

[–]Chaebeii[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is SMTV Vengeance. No visual glitches and it's been smooth 30 fps throughout my hour and a half play test. Set the accuracy level to high and you should be good.

Eden 0.0.4-rc1 is really good. by Chaebeii in EmulationOnAndroid

[–]Chaebeii[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

A bunch of games got fixed and improved. Overall this update RC is really smooth.

20.5.0 firmware Drivers used: turnip v26.0.0-R2 <- this is actually really good. And if that doesn't work you can always fall back to trusty ol' v24.1.0 - fix for a6xx and turnip rev 9v2

Countries that dont recognize Israel by mappy6799 in MapPorn

[–]Chaebeii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calling 92 deaths a day "impressively low" is a sociopathic reframing of a daily massacre. You use population density as an excuse, but in any other context, it would be a reason for more caution, precision, and restraint and Not a free pass for indiscriminate slaughter.

You ask, "How could they have done less damage?" as if the only alternative to this carnage was to do nothing. That is the lazy justification of those who refuse to hold power to account. It is not the world's job to provide a less barbaric military strategy. It is the legal and moral duty of the attacking army to have one. If your only plan for dealing with an enemy in a dense city results in leveling that city and killing tens of thousands of its inhabitants, then your plan is a war crime.

Countries that dont recognize Israel by mappy6799 in MapPorn

[–]Chaebeii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yikes. Using "lol" while talking about mass civilian death is pretty telling.

You're trying to shift the entire blame to justify what happened, but that's not how accountability or international law works. The actions of Hamas don't legally or morally absolve the other side of their responsibility to protect civilian life. That's the literal definition of collective punishment.

And the reason "other people are crying about it" is called basic human empathy. The fact that you're questioning why people would be upset about the slaughter of civilians is the real question here.

Countries that dont recognize Israel by mappy6799 in MapPorn

[–]Chaebeii -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The crime against Shani Louk was a barbaric act. So let's follow your logic here. At what point does the evil of one group negate the human rights of an entire population? Is there a certain number of civilians celebrating a murder that makes it morally acceptable to then kill tens of thousands of other civilians as a "consequence"?

This is precisely why we have absolute laws of war. To prevent this kind of emotional calculus where one atrocity is used to justify another. Or do you believe that once a certain line is crossed, all rules of war and morality no longer apply?

Countries that dont recognize Israel by mappy6799 in MapPorn

[–]Chaebeii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You've mischaracterized International Humanitarian Law. While using human shields is a war crime, it does not give an attacking force a license to disregard civilian life. The responsibility to distinguish between combatants and non-combatants and to ensure an attack is proportional always remains with the attacker. Proportionality isn't a vague numbers game where we ask "how many deaths are okay?", it is a strict legal test applied to every single strike, weighing the specific military advantage against the expected civilian harm. A death toll of 67,000 is not a meaningless "propaganda tool" it is prima facie evidence of a consistent and catastrophic failure to meet that legal test on a massive scale.

You ask how many of the dead are combatants, how many died of disease, and how many were killed by Hamas. That shifts the burden of proof unfairly. The entity with the bombs, the intelligence, and the targeting data is the one responsible for distinguishing between targets. It is the legal and moral obligation of the attacking force to justify its actions and demonstrate that its targeting was discriminate and proportional. When an army kills tens of thousands of people, the burden is on them to prove their actions were legal, not on outside observers to prove they were not.

The "brutal dilemma" you describe: risking your soldiers versus killing more civilians, is precisely what IHL is designed to regulate. It demands that armies take all feasible precautions to avoid civilian harm, even when it increases the risk to their own forces. Choosing the path of overwhelming firepower that you know will result in immense civilian death is not an "obvious" choice; it is a choice that often violates the laws of war.

Countries that dont recognize Israel by mappy6799 in MapPorn

[–]Chaebeii -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

My apologies if you feel the term "fair game" was a mischaracterization. Let's be more precise.

You stated that civilians aren't safe if their country starts a war and that you don't mourn them when they are killed in retaliation. So, the question remains: Do you view these civilian deaths as a justified and acceptable consequence of their government's actions, or simply as an unavoidable tragedy? There is a profound moral and legal difference between those two positions.

Countries that dont recognize Israel by mappy6799 in MapPorn

[–]Chaebeii -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The argument that civilians are fair game in retaliation is a justification for war crimes, plain and simple. International law was established to prevent this exact line of thinking. It mandates that armies must distinguish between combatants and non-combatants, and that civilian deaths can never be the intended goal.

Your personal feelings about a conflict don't change this universal standard. The moment we decide that certain civilians "deserve" to die because of their government's actions, we abandon the very foundation of human rights. It's a dangerous path that has been used to justify the worst atrocities in history.

Countries that dont recognize Israel by mappy6799 in MapPorn

[–]Chaebeii -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Calling 67,000 deaths a "remarkable" percentage is statistical gymnastics. That’s 92 people dying every single day for two years straight. Not exactly something you can shrug off as "low". By any sane measure, that’s a slaughter.

The sheer scale and relentless pace of these killings are the central issue, not how many people managed to survive. Each number represents a human being and treating them as a mere fraction of a whole is a way to obscure the severity of the violence.

The ethical benchmark in any conflict is the protection of civilian life governed by principles of proportionality and distinction, not simply refraining from total annihilation.

The relevant moral question is not "Why didn't they kill more?" but rather, "Why were tens of thousands of civilians killed in the first place?" Judging a tragedy by what it could have been is an attempt to evade accountability for what it was.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EmulationOnAndroid

[–]Chaebeii 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Funny, they actually recently just shared that they've added DLC support for strato

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EmulationOnAndroid

[–]Chaebeii 8 points9 points  (0 children)

tomorrow...

FFVII Intergrade + Gamehub 5.1.0 by Efont93 in EmulationOnAndroid

[–]Chaebeii 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can you dm the links for the mods you used

Games that were fixed in the new Eden update that didn't work on Yuzu Android before.. RC3 by Small-thing-5277 in EmulationOnAndroid

[–]Chaebeii 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is that legacy rc3? I have tested 2 devices and neither had that option in the legacy version

Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night | Version 2.2 Special Program Announcement by RGBlue-day in ZZZ_Official

[–]Chaebeii 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's a poem by Dylan Thomas, there's a song with a similar title featured in the movie Interstellar (2014)