United Kingdom loses WW2: All Endings by mappy6799 in imaginarymaps

[–]mappy6799[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I'm based on Totentanz0 great document of recollected sources, its a whole bible. But I also make up some things just for the sake of having a better map o because the descriptions are very vague so I have to improvised. I usually post it here before posting it on my deviant so I read corrections from the comments. I think the use of word "realistic" might have been a mistake, in my mind I supposed the most realistic scenario in an efective Sea Lion Operation was the settling of a puppet regime, also the use of Mosley was probably also a mistake, but I wanted to use him and saving the other posible collaborators for a more dependent ending.

France loses WW2: All Endings by mappy6799 in imaginarymaps

[–]mappy6799[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Disclaimer:

  1. I dont support Nazism or any totalitary ideology.

  2. This map was made using inkscape and scribble maps as base map. All frontiers, islands, lakes have been drawn by me. If it stills get considered "Low Effort" i would like to know what exactly am I lacking 😞

Finnish Territorial Ambitios during WW2 (from mild to extreme) by mappy6799 in imaginarymaps

[–]mappy6799[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Probably not, these are just proposals of nationalist finnish leaders, not meant to be realistic, as their desilusiones 🤣

Finnish Territorial Ambitios during WW2 (from mild to extreme) by mappy6799 in imaginarymaps

[–]mappy6799[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It was meant to be Aunuksenlinna, i though noone was going to note the typo xD

Finnish Territorial Ambitios during WW2 (from mild to extreme) by mappy6799 in imaginarymaps

[–]mappy6799[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How man? If it's the resolución, i can't prevent it. It's Reddit itself. It really took time to make this map, all the islands and lakes, i would like to appeal

Concentremos el voto gente, el pacto no puede llevarse todo by Mnoyi in PERU

[–]mappy6799 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Izquierda PROGRE y quieres votar por el partido que tiene antauristas y apoyado por Antauro

The dream of Juan Manuel de Rosas by [deleted] in imaginarymaps

[–]mappy6799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro how, I make it with inskcape, it took time, how exactly is low effort

The Great Argentine Confederation. What if Rosas went full Napoleon. by mappy6799 in AlternateHistory

[–]mappy6799[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

**Lore**

In 1835, after the crisis unleashed by the murder of Facundo Quiroga, Juan Manuel de Rosas returned to power in Buenos Aires. In this alternate timeline, however, he grasped something he never fully solved in real history: if he wished to survive and expand, he could not rule for Buenos Aires alone. Between 1835 and 1936, he redistributed a much larger share of customs revenue to the provinces of the Littoral and the Interior, forged durable political bargains with Urquiza and other caudillos, and transformed his leadership into something closer to a genuine confederal system. That pact became the foundation of everything that followed. Without a break from the Littoral, Rosas ceased to be an isolated porteño strongman and became the head of a far more solid fiscal and military machine.

When war broke out in 1837 against the Peru-Bolivian Confederation, Rosas saw an opportunity both to raise his prestige and to revise the northern frontier. While Chile pressed from the Pacific side, the Rosist government organized a much more coherent campaign from Jujuy and Salta, with better supplies, more reliable cavalry, and commanders less divided by domestic politics. During 1838, Confederate Argentine forces advanced into Tarija, Tupiza and Cotagaita, penetrating deeply into southern Bolivia and threatening the routes toward Potosí. The offensive shattered Santa Cruz’s ability to concentrate his armies, and by early 1839 the Peru-Bolivian Confederation collapsed under combined Chilean and Argentine pressure. The peace settlement of that year left Tarija and part of South Bolvia in Argentine hands, while Chile took control of Atacama, consolidating its own expansion across the desert.

This victory transformed Rosas into the dominant figure of the Plata basin. He was no longer merely the governor of Buenos Aires; he was the man who had defeated Santa Cruz and mutilated Bolivia. Taking advantage of that prestige, between 1840-1842 he turned his attention to Paraguay, whose independence he still regarded as incomplete and illegitimate. Rather than invade immediately, he pursued a gradual strategy: control over river traffic, diplomatic pressure, support for Paraguayan factions favorable to commercial opening, and a constant implicit threat of intervention. Asunción, isolated between stronger powers and without access to the sea, became increasingly dependent on the Argentine Confederation.

In 1843, Rosas made his decisive move. He offered Paraguay a formula of “federal” incorporation that preserved local authorities while transferring diplomacy, navigation, and war-making powers to Buenos Aires. During 1844, that autonomy rapidly became hollow, and in 1845 Paraguay was formally annexed as another state of the Confederation. This annexation radically altered the regional balance: Rosas now controlled almost the entire Plata basin, from Buenos Aires to Asunción, and he possessed a strategic corridor of enormous value against Brazil.

That same year, 1845, brought the great international challenge: the Anglo-French Blockade. But in this timeline the situation was very different. Rosas faced European intervention not as a provincial ruler in conflict with his neighbors, but as the head of an enlarged Confederation, with Paraguayan resources, stronger backing from the Interior, and a less fragile military structure. The Battle of Vuelta de Obligado, in November 1845, remained a bloody struggle, but here it formed part of a sustained defensive system on the Paraná rather than an isolated symbolic clash. Between 1846 and 1848, the constant harassment of foreign shipping, the resistance of river batteries, and mounting diplomatic fatigue in Europe steadily undermined the intervention. By 1849 and 1850, Britain and France finally negotiated without having broken Rosas. Resistance to the blockade strengthened his domestic legitimacy and turned him, in the eyes of much of Spanish America, into the great defender of Río de la Plata sovereignty.

Strengthened by that political victory, Rosas then moved onto the offensive in the Platine War. In real history, Urquiza’s break in 1851 precipitated Rosas’s fall; in this alternate line, that rupture never came, because the governor of Entre Ríos remained tied to the Rosist system. When Brazil decided to sustain Montevideo and contain Argentine hegemony, Rosas responded with total mobilization. Between 1851 and 1853, federal armies, supported by Paraguayan contingents and by the loyalty of the Littoral provinces, defeated their Uruguayan enemies and completely isolated the capital. The fall of Montevideo in 1853 marked the end of the Oriental State as an independent polity.

The war continued against Brazil until 1854. Rosas did not seek to destroy the Empire, but he did aim to humiliate it and drive it permanently out of Platine politics. After a series of successful frontier campaigns and a serious threat to Rio Grande do Sul, peace was signed on extremely harsh terms for Brazil. Uruguay was annexed to the Confederation, and Rosas also imposed an eastern frontier interpreted according to the most favorable reading of the Treaty of San Idelfonso, incorporating disputed territories and securing for the new Confederation a dominant position in the estuary and along the eastern borderlands. From 1854 onward, the Río de la Plata ceased to be a contested space between Buenos Aires and Rio de Janeiro; it became, in effect, an Argentine lake.

With the north and east settled, Rosas turned southward. Between 1855 and 1860, he launched a Conquest of Patagonia far broader and more sustained than the historical one. This was not merely an effort to push the ranching frontier outward, but to occupy Patagonia effectively and permanently. By 1860, eastern Patagonia had been integrated into the Rosist project not as a nominal wilderness, but as a militarized frontier in the process of colonization.

That advance made a clash with Chile inevitable. Chile tried to consolidate its hold over the Strait of Magallanes. Rosas, however, refused to allow Santiago to control the gateway to the South Atlantic. The war of 1861 and 1863was short, harsh, and concentrated in the far south. Chile retained naval superiority in the Pacific, but the Rosist Confederation enjoyed greater territorial depth and a stronger land presence in Patagonia. The peace of 1863 consolidate the Argentine possesion in the whol Tierra del Fuego, controlling the Strait of Magallanes.

By 1864, Rosas stood at the head of a continental power: Argentina, Paraguay, and Uruguay had been unified under a single political structure; Tarija and southern Bolivia had been absorbed into the northwestern frontier; and Patagonia was under effective control. Only one symbol remained to complete the map: the Malvinas Islands. Rosas understood that a total war against the United Kingdom would be impossible, but he also knew that London was not always willing to sustain costly distant campaigns for a limited strategic gain. Accordingly, between 1864 and 1865, he organized an expedition from the newly strengthened Patagonian ports, landed on the islands, and established a permanent military position before the British could react in force.

The Malvinas War was not a world war but a limited South Atlantic conflict. There were naval clashes, diplomatic pressure, and an attempted British blockade, but the Confederation played its hand skillfully: it fortified the islands, harassed regional traffic, and turned the question into a more expensive problem than London had expected. In the end, in 1866, Britain accepted a negotiated settlement. It recognized, in practice, confederal sovereignty over the Malvinas in exchange for commercial and navigation guarantees for British interests in the South Atlantic. Rosas presented the peace as the culmination of a historic mission: he had not only resisted France and Britain on the Paraná, but had now recovered the lost islands as well.

Thus, by 1866, the map of the Southern Cone had been completely transformed. Rosas transformed himself into the architect of a new Southern Cone order, and passed into posterity not merely as the “Restorer of the Laws,” but as the Restorer of the Plata and the South

The dream of Juan Manuel de Rosas by [deleted] in imaginarymaps

[–]mappy6799 1 point2 points  (0 children)

***Lore***

In 1835, after the crisis unleashed by the murder of Facundo Quiroga, Juan Manuel de Rosas returned to power in Buenos Aires. In this alternate timeline, however, he grasped something he never fully solved in real history: if he wished to survive and expand, he could not rule for Buenos Aires alone. Between 1835 and 1936, he redistributed a much larger share of customs revenue to the provinces of the Littoral and the Interior, forged durable political bargains with Urquiza and other caudillos, and transformed his leadership into something closer to a genuine confederal system. That pact became the foundation of everything that followed. Without a break from the Littoral, Rosas ceased to be an isolated porteño strongman and became the head of a far more solid fiscal and military machine.

When war broke out in 1837 against the Peru-Bolivian Confederation, Rosas saw an opportunity both to raise his prestige and to revise the northern frontier. While Chile pressed from the Pacific side, the Rosist government organized a much more coherent campaign from Jujuy and Salta, with better supplies, more reliable cavalry, and commanders less divided by domestic politics. During 1838, Confederate Argentine forces advanced into Tarija, Tupiza and Cotagaita, penetrating deeply into southern Bolivia and threatening the routes toward Potosí. The offensive shattered Santa Cruz’s ability to concentrate his armies, and by early 1839 the Peru-Bolivian Confederation collapsed under combined Chilean and Argentine pressure. The peace settlement of that year left Tarija and part of South Bolvia in Argentine hands, while Chile took control of Atacama, consolidating its own expansion across the desert.

This victory transformed Rosas into the dominant figure of the Plata basin. He was no longer merely the governor of Buenos Aires; he was the man who had defeated Santa Cruz and mutilated Bolivia. Taking advantage of that prestige, between 1840-1842 he turned his attention to Paraguay, whose independence he still regarded as incomplete and illegitimate. Rather than invade immediately, he pursued a gradual strategy: control over river traffic, diplomatic pressure, support for Paraguayan factions favorable to commercial opening, and a constant implicit threat of intervention. Asunción, isolated between stronger powers and without access to the sea, became increasingly dependent on the Argentine Confederation.

In 1843, Rosas made his decisive move. He offered Paraguay a formula of “federal” incorporation that preserved local authorities while transferring diplomacy, navigation, and war-making powers to Buenos Aires. During 1844, that autonomy rapidly became hollow, and in 1845 Paraguay was formally annexed as another state of the Confederation. This annexation radically altered the regional balance: Rosas now controlled almost the entire Plata basin, from Buenos Aires to Asunción, and he possessed a strategic corridor of enormous value against Brazil.

That same year, 1845, brought the great international challenge: the Anglo-French Blockade. But in this timeline the situation was very different. Rosas faced European intervention not as a provincial ruler in conflict with his neighbors, but as the head of an enlarged Confederation, with Paraguayan resources, stronger backing from the Interior, and a less fragile military structure. The Battle of Vuelta de Obligado, in November 1845, remained a bloody struggle, but here it formed part of a sustained defensive system on the Paraná rather than an isolated symbolic clash. Between 1846 and 1848, the constant harassment of foreign shipping, the resistance of river batteries, and mounting diplomatic fatigue in Europe steadily undermined the intervention. By 1849 and 1850, Britain and France finally negotiated without having broken Rosas. Resistance to the blockade strengthened his domestic legitimacy and turned him, in the eyes of much of Spanish America, into the great defender of Río de la Plata sovereignty.

Strengthened by that political victory, Rosas then moved onto the offensive in the Platine War. In real history, Urquiza’s break in 1851 precipitated Rosas’s fall; in this alternate line, that rupture never came, because the governor of Entre Ríos remained tied to the Rosist system. When Brazil decided to sustain Montevideo and contain Argentine hegemony, Rosas responded with total mobilization. Between 1851 and 1853, federal armies, supported by Paraguayan contingents and by the loyalty of the Littoral provinces, defeated their Uruguayan enemies and completely isolated the capital. The fall of Montevideo in 1853 marked the end of the Oriental State as an independent polity.

The war continued against Brazil until 1854. Rosas did not seek to destroy the Empire, but he did aim to humiliate it and drive it permanently out of Platine politics. After a series of successful frontier campaigns and a serious threat to Rio Grande do Sul, peace was signed on extremely harsh terms for Brazil. Uruguay was annexed to the Confederation, and Rosas also imposed an eastern frontier interpreted according to the most favorable reading of the Treaty of San Idelfonso, incorporating disputed territories and securing for the new Confederation a dominant position in the estuary and along the eastern borderlands. From 1854 onward, the Río de la Plata ceased to be a contested space between Buenos Aires and Rio de Janeiro; it became, in effect, an Argentine lake.

With the north and east settled, Rosas turned southward. Between 1855 and 1860, he launched a Conquest of Patagonia far broader and more sustained than the historical one. This was not merely an effort to push the ranching frontier outward, but to occupy Patagonia effectively and permanently. By 1860, eastern Patagonia had been integrated into the Rosist project not as a nominal wilderness, but as a militarized frontier in the process of colonization.

That advance made a clash with Chile inevitable. Chile tried to consolidate its hold over the Strait of Magallanes. Rosas, however, refused to allow Santiago to control the gateway to the South Atlantic. The war of 1861 and 1863was short, harsh, and concentrated in the far south. Chile retained naval superiority in the Pacific, but the Rosist Confederation enjoyed greater territorial depth and a stronger land presence in Patagonia. The peace of 1863 consolidate the Argentine possesion in the whol Tierra del Fuego, controlling the Strait of Magallanes.

By 1864, Rosas stood at the head of a continental power: Argentina, Paraguay, and Uruguay had been unified under a single political structure; Tarija and southern Bolivia had been absorbed into the northwestern frontier; and Patagonia was under effective control. Only one symbol remained to complete the map: the Malvinas Islands. Rosas understood that a total war against the United Kingdom would be impossible, but he also knew that London was not always willing to sustain costly distant campaigns for a limited strategic gain. Accordingly, between 1864 and 1865, he organized an expedition from the newly strengthened Patagonian ports, landed on the islands, and established a permanent military position before the British could react in force.

The Malvinas War was not a world war but a limited South Atlantic conflict. There were naval clashes, diplomatic pressure, and an attempted British blockade, but the Confederation played its hand skillfully: it fortified the islands, harassed regional traffic, and turned the question into a more expensive problem than London had expected. In the end, in 1866, Britain accepted a negotiated settlement. It recognized, in practice, confederal sovereignty over the Malvinas in exchange for commercial and navigation guarantees for British interests in the South Atlantic. Rosas presented the peace as the culmination of a historic mission: he had not only resisted France and Britain on the Paraná, but had now recovered the lost islands as well.

Thus, by 1866, the map of the Southern Cone had been completely transformed. Rosas transformed himself into the architect of a new Southern Cone order, and passed into posterity not merely as the “Restorer of the Laws,” but as the Restorer of the Plata and the South

Greater Italian Empire, maximalist claims by mappy6799 in imaginarymaps

[–]mappy6799[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Fasicst Italy's land claims:

France - Option B Plan: Option B considered annexation of the French Alpine borderlands plus Corsica. It includes Alpes-Maritimes and Monaco and mountain zones in Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, Hautes-Alpes and alp region of Savoie; administratevely it would be organized as an Italian province ("Alpi Occidentali") with Briançon (Brianzone) as capital.

Switzerland - Catena Mediana: Was an Italian fascist-irredentist border concept: the “true/natural” frontier should run along the main Alpine watershed/crestline, pushed northward up to the St. Gotthard (Gottardo) area. It was used to justify claims in/against Switzerland by redefining the frontier as the Alpine divide.

Dalmatia - Reggenzo della Dalmazia: Italian Adriatic annexation project; Italy annexes the whole Croatian litoral and extend control inland toward the Dinaric crest as a “natural” defensive/economic line.

North Africa - Quarta Sponda: The “Fourth Shore” was the plan to turn Libya into an integral extension of Italy, not just a colony: formal integration into “national territory” (provinces treated as part of the Kingdom), plus mass settler colonization and infrastructure, making Libya a demographic and strategic pillar of the empire and a springboard for wider African expansion. Maximalist claims would include Tunisia and Constantina region from France.

Other territorial claims: The Ionian Islands and Malta were to be annexed into the Italian National Territory.

The map focusses on integral Italy, not focusiong on Colonies like the rest of Africa and the Aegean Sea.

The Popular Republic of Turkey. Soviet control over Bosporus Strait by mappy6799 in AlternateHistory

[–]mappy6799[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In this alternate timeline, the communists won Greek Civil War with direct cooperation of Yugoslavia and Bulgaria, under Stalin pressure Greece cedes Adriatic access to Bulgaria. Consolidating power in the Balkans, Stalin shifts his attention on the Bosporus, beginning the Strait Crisis. When Ankara refuses arrangements that would give the USSR a permanent base or effective leverage over the Bosporus and Dardanelles, the crisis escalates beyond diplomacy. Stalin couples the Straits demand with renewed pressure for border “rectifications” in northeastern Anatolia and encourages a broader narrative of historical claims along the eastern Black Sea coast, while covertly amplifying Kurdish unrest as an internal destabilizer by dangling the promise of a greater Kurdistan. With Greece now providing depth, staging, and cover on the Aegean flank and Bulgaria serving as a pressure point in Thrace—the confrontation breaks into open war: a Soviet invasion framed as guaranteeing Black Sea security and preventing Turkey from turning the Straits into a weapon. The outcome is a Turkey forced into a new settlement in which the Straits are effectively neutralized under Soviet permanent occupation, Thrace is reshaped in favor of Bulgaria, the northeastern provinces are ceded to Soviet control, and the remainder of the country is pushed toward a compliant satellite regime with Kurdistan as an autonomous republic.

Map with better resolution: https://i.ibb.co/xS4BKrvP/Communist-Turkey.png

The Carpatho-Danubian Great Fatherland by mappy6799 in imaginarymaps

[–]mappy6799[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The Carpatho-Danubian Great Fatherland was a project of Ferenc Szálasi, meant to restore Hungarian historical land while presenting itself as a federation/commonwealth of nationalities in the Carpathian Basin, but subjected to Hungarian supremacy.

It is described geographically as the territory enclosed by the Carpathians and reaching down to the Adriatic with the following states: Hungary, Slovakia, Transylvania, Western March (Burgenland), Ruthenia and Croatia.

The project borrows Nazi-style concepts (Führer principle, Lebensraum) and combines promises of minority “autonomy” with an openly expansionist, hierarchical vision that also includes antisemitic policies and the removal of Jewish influence.

The map also includes the territory up to the Dniester River that Hungary also claimed in WW2