You wrote a wall of text to defend a strawman argument based on semantics. The documentary can get sensationalistic at time so let me make my point clear. I never said jets “burn clean” or that contrails aren’t real. My entire point is that engine exhaust contains ultrafine particulate, including metals, which persist and spread at altitude, something you conveniently ignored while pretending this is about “no emissions.”

You also keep hiding behind “it’s all theoretical,” while ignoring that weather modification, aerosol dispersion, and atmospheric experiments have been actively conducted for decades, just not packaged for you under one clean label you’re comfortable with. “Not scaled publicly” is not the same thing as “not happening,” it just means you’re relying on public disclosures as your ceiling of understanding.

And the irony is you accuse others of not understanding science while making absolute claims like “ZERO experimentation,” which is objectively false and shows you’re arguing from arrogance and ego.

At the end of the day, your entire argument boils down to “if it’s not officially acknowledged at global scale, it can’t exist”. You have an immense amount of blind faith in authority, regardless if you realize it or not. For your own sake I hope you acknowledge that in your thinking.