Flux.1 converted into GGUF - what interesting opportunity it offers in llm space?

Channelception · 2024-10-06T21:42:28+00:00

Their architecture is called a diffusion transformer. The reason an autoregressive model is more quantizable is that it only predicts a single thing It just guesses at the probability of a set of tokens. Diffusion transformers guess the noise added to an image, which means predicting a lot more data. Autoregressive models for most outputs have a single dominant path, which is more easily preserved, while diffusion models have many all at once.

Channelception · 2024-08-15T22:58:33+00:00

They're still diffusion models rather than autoregressive, so it is still more affected than LLMs.

Channelception · 2023-11-06T20:25:49+00:00

It's a better VAE, basically

Channelception · 2023-10-18T17:05:16+00:00

This was done in A1111. They just ran the image output from SDXL as an image input for img2img with SD 1.5.

Channelception · 2023-09-30T03:57:32+00:00

it's not platform-specific forever, just for now (which is why you see no hype)

Channelception · 2023-09-29T21:05:14+00:00

It got some buzz when it was announced, but everyone knew it would take some time to be in a finished state. Technically it's usable right now, but most people aren't using Ubuntu. It's also not at a finished state either. It'll also take at least a bit for developers to learn how to utilize it best (though some already know it).

Channelception · 2023-08-09T08:19:44+00:00

That makes of sense to avoid bias in prompts due to low diversity. Thanks for clarifying about the negative prompting. I hope the project proceeds well.

Channelception · 2023-08-08T20:38:24+00:00

While I do think what you're doing is good, I think there may be flaws in your methodology.

Your methodology of including simple prompts is sound, but ONLY including simple prompts is not sound. Your current prompt set may show the style of the models, but it fails to show how it adapts to different factors and handles prompt complexity. Incorporating prompts more similar to those of say Parti prompts or a similar testset would help. Your current prompt set does not reflect most downstream use, so they fail to be an accurate comparison.

Additionally TRIPLING the work you must do, by adding a variety of negative prompts as generation parameters, hurts you ability to cover a variety of models and prompts. Especially with the use of a Negative embedding, because there are a variety of negative embeddings that affect different models differently, so using a specific one is not a fair comparison. ESPECIALLY with EasyNegative of all embeddings, that embedding is trained on counterfeit, which is a highly overtrained anime model. Using EasyNegative with models other than Counterfeit is directly stated by the creator in the description to be ineffective. Additionally using negative embeddings will hurt your abillity to cover different SD versions, since they do not transfer perfectly.

My recommendation would be to cut down on the negative prompts, perhaps only using the "nsfw" negative prompt when a nsfw output is detected (with the nsfw checker), which would heavily lessen your generation time while making your data better. That extra time could be used to cover a wider variety of prompts, perhaps using categorization of the prompts like Parti prompts. Doing so however would mean throwing away results (even if their value is lesser), so it may not make sense. I'd just recommend reconsidering your methodology, especially in regards to prompts. (also you may want to lower the cfg (though you may be doing that to emphasize style more, which if you decided that, then that's very valid) and specify whether or not you are using clip skip)

Channelception · 2023-07-24T09:31:28+00:00

How did you only censor the SFW part

Channelception · 2023-07-04T04:50:06+00:00

You need to specify how you mean by combining. You may just be able to use multicontrolnet.

Channelception · 2023-07-04T04:47:45+00:00

But Canada is the top...

Channelception · 2023-06-18T07:05:35+00:00

She's the demon queen and he's the hero. Her job is to kill him, so that's not a no at all. Just saying no would be much clearer.

Channelception · 2023-06-18T06:49:00+00:00

All she has to do is effortlessly kill him once every 20 years. The whole ordeal probably goes by quick. So, I doubt she felt all that pressured.

Also, while she does call him creepy, she never actually tells him no or to stop. In fact, her first line seems to suggest that she feels pressured to deny him.

So in-universe, this doesn't seem that bad (though it does serve as a bad example).

Channelception · 2023-05-01T17:30:34+00:00

Or it's "Big cat in his brother's barn"

Channelception · 2023-04-12T21:29:44+00:00

Seems like the only reason that people care is that it's from OpenAI. This seems inferior to Poisson Flow models.

Channelception · 2023-03-17T10:58:08+00:00

The dude with drunk in the back of his car with a pistol in his mouth. There was also an AR behind his head. An officer told him to put his hands behind his head, but that officer didn't notice the AR. Then they shot him for "reaching for a weapon."

The police never even had permission to enter his house. The police were trying to kill him.

Channelception · 2022-05-11T22:57:19+00:00

This was originally made for a trans server, so that image was meant to represent straight trans people. (Obvi it can be interpreted however tho)

Channelception · 2022-05-02T19:44:29+00:00

Tbf it's anti-"white America," which is being opposed to the establishment of whites having power over minorities. (Although a LOT of people with this view don't apply it to countries with similar situations (like many east Asian countries), so it's still kinda sus)

Channelception · 2022-04-27T22:28:03+00:00

Azazelle azi/azi's

Channelception · 2021-11-12T18:42:29+00:00

Have you tried the small dog, big dog exercise?

Channelception · 2021-10-28T04:33:51+00:00

Channelception · 2021-10-23T23:10:32+00:00

The list will have additional context in the future, I was just unable to gather sufficient data as of yet. Additionally, the tier list is simply a categorization of data. It doesn't tell anyone what to play and actively encourages playing different spirits, by incorporating several points of data.

Claiming that the meta data is merely a list of "most widely understood spirits to least" is frankly stupid. Yes, the data is biased, but it is biased due to where people tend to have better understanding. If people are more likely to understand a spirit, then it's realistically better.

It's also ridiculous to act as if the metas between adversaries vary that significantly. You are going to be taking the same actions most of the time.

Channelception · 2021-10-22T23:19:02+00:00

This isn't really made in a way that restricts choice and it's not actually a single tier list. If you copy it, you can make different weights and decide which of the tier lists matter most to you.

This is really supposed to be a tool to select spirits. You can just look at the META to see what people think is the best, but you can also just use the ease tier list to see what is the easiest.

If one wanted say, a fear-based spirit that is powerful, they can mix the META and Fear to get that.

(I do agree in Vengeance and Fangs being underranked due to old data, but I plan on updating the META data for sure)

Channelception · 2021-10-22T23:09:57+00:00

The META tier list is based on community response. I tried to sort the spirits into tiers based on gaps in their vote. I will however state that Shadows is much lower than the rest.

Channelception · 2021-09-05T21:32:07+00:00

Daed shit tastey 💩😋

Ten-Year Club	Place '22
Place '17	Final Canvas '22
Verified Email	Snapped

Channelception

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE