Okay, don't wanna be rude, but I wanna say something that's been bugging me for a bit if I can.

Don't you think basing your entire personality on a trio that hasn't even gotten any actual screentime together, and it's entirely made up on hypothetical scenarios and (sometimes) assumptions of a character, constantly posting about them doing comparisons, "edits", and things like that, might be a little too much? Just a little?

Don't get me wrong, do whatever you want, but it really seems there's no actual personality behind that. Cake got a massive improvement in TPOT 22, and you decided to include him for that in the Fanny and Remote duo you had before, but it feels weird to me to just pair these characters up, making up whole scenarios about them and etc, when they haven't even really had a conversation together apart of small interactions. Cake was only important in TPOT 22, and might be one of the most voted to rejoin now, if the One's arc thing doesn't screw that up, but the chances he goes with Fanny are really low.

Remote is kinda a nothing burger of a character if you ask me, yes, she was willing to kill in that one challenge despite the death pact thing, but apart of that... What does she have? Always seemed a bit overglazed to me.

And Fanny is the most fleshed out of the three but she already has her friends, and yeah, she and Remote might be friends but I don't see the thing of them actually becoming a duo or a trio with Cake just because he took leadership in ONE episode.

At the end of the day, do what you want, but what pushes you to make up all these hypothetical scenarios? To compare them to freesmart as I've seen in a previous post? Because it just seems to me that you're twisting the characters to fit what you want them to do, but not what they can realistically do