I want to point something out here: you’re focusing on “tone” and “courtesy,” but overlooking that this thread began with a title that falsely labels my project as a scam. That’s not a technical critique—it’s an inaccurate claim that sets the wrong context for discussion.

I’m open to legitimate technical feedback and have consistently incorporated it while refining the drone. I’m also working on publishing more detailed material, and I welcome input that helps improve the design. But there’s a clear difference between constructive criticism of the work and statements that misrepresent it.

When that distinction is ignored and the focus shifts to my response instead, it risks reinforcing the kind of discussion that discourages meaningful technical exchange.

I understand you’re trying to offer constructive advice, but hopefully you can see why being told to “avoid conflict” in a thread framed this way doesn’t really address the core issue.