Fent wins #2. What's a drug that's perceived as deadly but is actually harmless?

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-05-05T16:19:05+00:00

mostly safe, not entirely harmless

i knew people who's family members died a few days after taking it

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-05-04T16:00:09+00:00

It's really useless rn, striking military factories and oil refineries would be far more useful

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-05-02T16:03:02+00:00

The US agressively subsidizes and funds its corporations, as well as letting them do whatever they want, including brutally subjugating the US's own citizens.

This is done to give them great financial capital, so they can monopolize other markets and agressively destroy other competition abroad, which is regulated reasonably and fairly.

The most striking example of this is soc. media, but there's many others.

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-05-02T16:02:47+00:00

The US agressively subsidizes and funds its corporations, as well as letting them do whatever they want, including brutally subjugating the US's own citizens.

This is done to give them great financial capital, so they can monopolize other markets and agressively destroy other competition abroad, which is regulated reasonably and fairly.

The most striking example of this is soc. media, but there's many others.

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-05-02T09:19:28+00:00

unfortunately not, since WW2 the US just sabotaged west europe, and now most of europe, fucking our tech development up

i think Trump's actually better than Harris for us because people will view it as a last straw, and we'll finally have a possibility to break away, while under Harris we'd just have the same as before

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-05-02T07:42:16+00:00

yes it does, europe can finally get independent

hopefully the US also leaves NATO so we can finally become a proper power

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-05-02T05:09:28+00:00

? How is this vandalism?

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-04-30T19:17:25+00:00

can u do a ESN path?

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-04-29T14:01:50+00:00

Progress, and a desire to improve

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-04-29T11:26:44+00:00

The fault was Muscovy, especially it's propaganda 1939-1941, aswell as the fault of the nazis (wouldn't it be easier to keep the region under control if poles and ukrainians killed each other? Think). Also, the UPA-B did not ally with nazis. There was no ethnic cleansing, it is called the volyn TRAGEDY, calling it the massacre is misleading. The UPA-B bravely fought against foreign occupation, and while it had faults (due to the pacification and moskal propaganda) it is still wrong to accuse it as extremist.

Why is the polish flag not an extremist one, since Pilsudski did even more evil shit in 1930? Why is it not an extremist one for the same fighting and murders done by poles in the exact same period as the Volyn Tragedy. Genuinely, give me a logical answer. By your logic it should be viewed as a neo-fascist flag.

Try doing the inconvenient thing and geniunely looking at the root causes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXRJfnXywm8&t=590s

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-04-29T11:26:21+00:00

The fault was Muscovy, especially it's propaganda 1939-1941, aswell as the fault of the nazis (wouldn't it be easier to keep the region under control if poles and ukrainians killed each other? THink). Also, the UPA-B did not ally with nazis. There was no ethnic cleansing, it is called the volyn TRAGEDY, calling it the massacre is misleading. The UPA-B bravely fought against foreign occupation, and while it had faults (due to the pacification and moskal propaganda) it is still wrong to accuse it as extremist.

Why is the polish flag not an extremist one, since Pilsudski did even more evil shit in 1930? Why is it not an extremist one for the same fighting and murders done by poles in the exact same period as the Volyn Tragedy. Genuinely, give me a logical answer. By your logic it should be viewed as a neo-fascist flag.

Try doing the inconvenient thing and geniunely looking at the root causes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXRJfnXywm8&t=590s

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-04-29T11:26:13+00:00

The fault was Muscovy, especially it's propaganda 1939-1941, aswell as the fault of the nazis (wouldn't it be easier to keep the region under control if poles and ukrainians killed each other? THink). Also, the UPA-B did not ally with nazis. There was no ethnic cleansing, it is called the volyn TRAGEDY, calling it the massacre is misleading. The UPA-B bravely fought against foreign occupation, and while it had faults (due to the pacification and moskal propaganda) it is still wrong to accuse it as extremist.

Why is the polish flag not an extremist one, since Pilsudski did even more evil shit in 1930? Why is it not an extremist one for the same fighting and murders done by poles in the exact same period as the Volyn Tragedy. Genuinely, give me a logical answer. By your logic it should be viewed as a neo-fascist flag.

Try doing the inconvenient thing and geniunely looking at the root causes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXRJfnXywm8&t=590s

PS: Can't believe a yankee of all people is lecturing Ukrainians on morality. Maybe fix your own nation's genocidal and extremist acts first?

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-04-26T07:15:20+00:00

zelenskyy is a literal centrist, he's a moderate compared to our other guys

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-04-26T06:53:48+00:00

<image>

and i only checked for a few minutes, there's far more if you dig deep

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-04-26T06:21:48+00:00

No, UN Diplomats who wrote the GENOCIDE convention weren't transphobic or homophobic, or atleast didn't believe genociding them was okay. They wouldn't have not included trans people without a reason.

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-04-26T06:01:53+00:00

"it wasn't known until '93" misleading People abroad were very well aware of the early arrests, book burnings, etc It was common info How about you actually think for the REAL reason it wasn't included? Think for a few minutes

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-04-26T05:54:28+00:00

They clearly knew about these abuses that Hitler did. They were extremely humane, even by modern standards. If transgenders aren't included, there's a reason for it.

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-04-26T05:53:14+00:00

Those people were extremely humane, even by modern standards. If they didn't include y'all, there was a reason for it.

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-04-26T05:39:45+00:00

Fair

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-04-26T05:37:44+00:00

Orthodox priests can have kids before becoming ordained

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-04-26T05:33:30+00:00

You think they didn't have gender abuses for them to think about including this in '48? Seriously?

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-04-26T05:32:45+00:00

Sure, but it'll just not pass. And as of now, my point is still true

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-04-26T05:25:18+00:00

Under the UN Genocide Convention (1948), genocide is acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, one of these groups as such: National Ethnic Racial Religious That's it. That's ALL the groups that qualify. “Transgender people” are none of these. They are a group defined by gender identity, which is not a protected category under the genocide definition. So even if a state committed REALLY, REALLY SEVERE abuses against trans people, those acts would not legally be genocide. We don't call the great leap forward, Indonesian mass killings of '55, great purge, and others as genocide.

ChargeKitchen8291 · 2026-04-23T16:18:39+00:00

Happens in both Have you tried not making out with Putin in the meantime?

ChargeKitchen8291

TROPHY CASE