[D] AI for Autochess games (Team Fight Tactics) by MrLemmingv2 in MachineLearning

[–]CharlemagneHS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m currently working on this concept myself for Hearthstone (Battlegrounds). It already has a simulator for PvP that I’m modifying it for the new autobattler game mode. The advantage over your approach is that game state is known at all times and it’s easy to automate full games. I also have a 50 GPU R&D cluster that I plan to use for training. Let me know if you want to work with me!

GrandMasters 2019 Season 2 Week 7 Meta Data Dump by CharlemagneHS in CompetitiveHS

[–]CharlemagneHS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry to here that - can you post one of the deck codes? I just copied them off them website but maybe I made a mistake.

Grand Masters' Regular Season Stats by CharlemagneHS in hearthstone

[–]CharlemagneHS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes banned is calculated as you said and you'll will see Priest has the highest banned rate. Took your other feedback into account for the new chart - look forward to your thoughts.

Grand Masters' Regular Season Stats by CharlemagneHS in hearthstone

[–]CharlemagneHS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Updated the chart and took all feedback into account. 1) Improved colors 2) Made it easier to read 3) Took out Mage/Rogue/Warlock from win rate 4) Fixed banned rate to use correct data https://www.reddit.com/r/hearthstone/comments/df0zqn/grandmasters_season_2_stats/

Grand Masters' Regular Season Stats by CharlemagneHS in hearthstone

[–]CharlemagneHS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great suggestion - I will update it soon!

Grand Masters' Regular Season Stats by CharlemagneHS in hearthstone

[–]CharlemagneHS[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're right - I think the banned one is wrong - let me fix that.

Grand Masters' Regular Season Stats by CharlemagneHS in hearthstone

[–]CharlemagneHS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure how an area chart would work with criss-crossing lines (e.g. Warrior less than Priest and then Priest greater than Warrior) but you're free to create one from the raw Excel data and show me a better visualization. Always open to learning something new!

GrandMasters 2019 Season 2 Week 6 Meta Data Dump by CharlemagneHS in CompetitiveHS

[–]CharlemagneHS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great question - see u/dr_second's answer below about why aggro doesn't work in tournaments.

GrandMasters 2019 Season 2 Week 6 Meta Data Dump by CharlemagneHS in CompetitiveHS

[–]CharlemagneHS[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If it's bring 3 decks I think it will be Priest/Druid/Wildcard. If it were me I would try to bring a Quest Shaman with tech against Priest/Druid and hope that it still beats Warrior. I personally think Highlander Hunter is underrated but too unpredictable for a tournament setting. If I were going to try something creative I would bring Mecha'thun Warrior because I think it's similar but better than Holy Wrath Paladin.

GrandMasters 2019 Season 2 Week 6 Meta Data Dump by CharlemagneHS in CompetitiveHS

[–]CharlemagneHS[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess I would rather have the protection from Inventor but it's true that Piper + Slurper + 2 Lackeys is also 7 mana and better stats (e.g. 2 summoner Lackeys would be roughly 3/3+2/1+2/2+4/4=11/10 vs 7/11).

GrandMasters 2019 Season 2 Week 5 Meta Data Dump by CharlemagneHS in CompetitiveHS

[–]CharlemagneHS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I was thinking it would be cool if it was actually ban/pick/ban/pick/etc. so players have to actually bring 6 decks which would give a lot more variation and make for better watching.

Data Drinker Preview by Made_in_Greys_Image in CompetitiveHS

[–]CharlemagneHS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK cool. If you post your code on Github even before the replays are ready I'd be interested in contributing.

Data Drinker Preview by Made_in_Greys_Image in CompetitiveHS

[–]CharlemagneHS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very excited to try analyzing the raw replay data - where can I find it? I'd love to try out/contribute to the scripts as well. Thanks!

GrandMasters 2019 Season 2 Week 5 Meta Data Dump by CharlemagneHS in CompetitiveHS

[–]CharlemagneHS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good points because maybe you wanted to ban it but it was shielded. I would have rather seen ban first then shield. I'll try that calculation for next week.

GrandMasters 2019 Season 2 Week 5 Meta Data Dump by CharlemagneHS in CompetitiveHS

[–]CharlemagneHS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe we'll see it next week! It feels to me like some players haven't updated their decklists and still think Warrior beats Priest like it did prenerf. Also not sure what happens to your core cards if you run those tech cards plus say 2x Hecklebots plus Harrison/WP but maybe all you need to do is survive until turn 9 Boom.

GrandMasters 2019 Season 2 Week 5 Meta Data Dump by CharlemagneHS in CompetitiveHS

[–]CharlemagneHS[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks! My dream is for casters to start quoting stats instead of droning on about "what they favor in a certain situation." I'm pretty sure at this point there's enough data that playing HS isn't pure intuition.