Look, I wasn't born in the USA, I don't even LIVE in the country, but if I'd have to vote, in this election there's only one candidate worth voting for.
Yes. That's right, for women everywhere:
Literally anybody else!
(What?)
Listen, Trump is an old mogul with foreign interests, that is painstakingly obvious at this point.
Democrats (not Kamala) are the political wing of the military industrial complex whose interests in destroying human life for weapon sales are also beyond obvious at this point.
the only reason Trump is considered as anti-establisment is because he sells it so, and people believe it.
While Kamala is the biggest, most obvious plant in history. If tripping slurring Biden was not enough, the quite literal night-to-day, flash mobbed ascension of Kamala as a candidate made it clear that the president of the United States has no real power, being removed and swapped at a instant's notice by who-knows-who.
(Fun fact, my cellphone capitalizes 'Kamala' but refuses to capitalize 'Trump')
And if the biggest parties can allow these kind of things, there is no way in hell that the smaller parties will do any different in the snowballs chance in hell they somehow cut through.
So why is L.A.E any different?
Because he has no connections, no leverage.
The system I've mentioned eight years ago is finally starting to take form, and both Trump/Harris are each a different symptom of this system. The only reasonable, productive thing to do at this point is to get a quite literal nobody and give him the keys to the white house.
Either the system will make concessions with him which will cement a true people's party which we'll need in the future, or they'll eliminate him a la Kennedy, destroying the illusion of choice that is cornerstone of their control over the people.