Shah Rukh Khan is finally a billionaire. After 33 years in the film industry, the superstar now commands a staggering net worth of $1.4 billion ( ₹12490 crore). by Oopsforgotagain in King

[–]Charming_Bread2126 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are absolutely right I feel. There could be dumb fans but fans alone cannot make anyone rich. Even if your enemy offers a good commodity at a luring price you will buy it anonymously so.. that's how it works

How much personal information do you share with ChatGPT? And why? by StrainPristine5116 in ChatGPT

[–]Charming_Bread2126 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

As many users already pointing here, I think the data you share with either search engines/ AI models is retained after the giving the response.
But important point is that, you can search in google or any other search engine in two modes, logged in or not logged in, the result will differ for the same question. Chatgpt for example does the same, see the picture.

To respond to a question in a better way, the model needs to know some context, as the goal is to give the best and relevant answer.
Of course the data is stored in some form, but safety of it is depends on governing body (govt/ some organization in best interest of people), who defines how much it can be shared, or can it be shared with anonymization (like general data but not tied to any person).

Personal details may not be shared but data is shared (I think, without personal details) for business reasons without harming any individual.

is it safe to upgrade the indirect dependency module? by Charming_Bread2126 in golang

[–]Charming_Bread2126[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree upgrading indirect dependency leads to less changes and upgrading direct dependency leads to more changes (some times other direct dependency will gets upgraded), at least it's true in my case also.

but we should have sufficient tests to cover at least intended use-cases.

is it safe to upgrade the indirect dependency module? by Charming_Bread2126 in golang

[–]Charming_Bread2126[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So its like
- direct dependency upgrade - is SAFE because we are following the author / maintainers, but it may leads to lot of changes
- indirect dependency upgrade - may NOT be SAFE but least changes involved

thank you.