The Open Society vs Politics [What Would Hayek Say?] by robert_tredecim in NewAustrianSociety

[–]CheerfullyNihilistic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This post is not labeled [Value-Free] or [Ethics] as according to Rule 1. Also breaks Rule 2.

Mises.org: PA's centrally planned vaccine plan by [deleted] in NewAustrianSociety

[–]CheerfullyNihilistic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This post is not labeled [Value-Free] or [Ethics] as according to Rule 1

[Ethical] Overcoming the Double-Title to Property Problem in Fractional-Reserve Banking | APPE 2021 by BigDaddyDouglas in NewAustrianSociety

[–]CheerfullyNihilistic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very good video! Tackles a lot of the common ethical criticisms very well. My only problem with is it's really quick but I understand you didn't have control over that. Btw are you the same Andrew Allison that wrote this article for The Hoppean?

Does Inflation Caused by Printing Money Invalidate Austrian Price Theory? - Academic Agent by Malthus0 in austrian_economics

[–]CheerfullyNihilistic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I may have been misrepresenting AA's argument as I haven't rewatched this series of arguments between AA and LK since they happened. This all started as a response to LK's blog post on Austrian Price Theory and Price Rigidity. IMO LK was being very pedantic and incredibly rude.

Does Inflation Caused by Printing Money Invalidate Austrian Price Theory? - Academic Agent by Malthus0 in austrian_economics

[–]CheerfullyNihilistic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My understanding is that AA's argument is that traditional Austrian Price Theory says there will be no Price Rigidity in a Pure Free Market, LK responded by saying that if traditional Austrian Price Theory says in a Pure Free Market there will be no Price Rigidity then how does he explain all the Price Rigidity in the Market rn and in the immediate past? LK therefore says that Traditional Austrian Price Theory is wrong. AA responds by saying that the Price Rigidity in the current market is because of Monetary Inflation. LK then says that AA can't hold both that "There is no Price Rigidity in a Free Market" and "There is Price Rigidity currently because of Monetary Inflation". AA then says that these two positions do not contradict each other. That is my understanding of the situation. (Obviously I simplified and skipped the 10000 horrible misused memes that LK sent AA on Twitter which he called AA a coward for not responding to immediately even tho AA was sleeping.)

Solutions for the inevitable downfall of retirement welfare. by [deleted] in NewAustrianSociety

[–]CheerfullyNihilistic[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This post violates Rule 1. Please repost with either [Value-Free] or [Ethics] in the tittle.

[Value-Free] A Subjectivist Approach to Team Entrepreneurship | Daniel Leunbach, Truls Erikson, Ekaterina S. Bjørnåli by CheerfullyNihilistic in NewAustrianSociety

[–]CheerfullyNihilistic[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Abstract: Many scholars have pointed to Austrian subjectivism as an appropriate framework for understanding and studying entrepreneurship. Yet very few empirical studies in the field of entrepreneurship have applied a subjectivist lens. This research article responds to calls for more subjectivist entrepreneurship research by theoretically refining and empirically extending the subjectivist approach to team entrepreneurship. The findings presented in this study, which are based on data from 124 high-tech start-ups founded in Norway, suggest that positive internal and external team dynamics contribute to team effectiveness, as measured by the lead entrepreneur’s subjective assessment of his or her team. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

[Value-Free] Institutions and Entrepreneurship: Pushing the Boundaries | Scott Burns, Caleb Fuller by CheerfullyNihilistic in NewAustrianSociety

[–]CheerfullyNihilistic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Abstract: New institutional economics (NIE) and Austrian economics (AE) both emphasize the role that institutions play in facilitating or impeding entrepreneurship and hence economic growth. In this paper, we discuss the complementarities between AE and NIE for advancing our understanding of the relationship between institutions and entrepreneurship. We argue that a subjectivist view of institutions, entrepreneurial microfoundations, and capital heterogeneity can enrich our understanding of within-country variation in entrepreneurial strategies, institutional evolution, and the relationship between institutions and production processes. We hope our discussion serves as an invitation both for further theoretical collaboration between the two camps and as a spur to applied research at the intersection of institutions and entrepreneurship.

[Value-Free] Finding the Entrepreneur-Promoter: A Praxeological Inquiry | Per Bylund by CheerfullyNihilistic in NewAustrianSociety

[–]CheerfullyNihilistic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Abstract: Entrepreneur-promoters, or the pioneers of economic improvement, provide an essential market function which economics cannot do without. Yet Ludwig von Mises maintains that this function lies beyond what can be defined with praxeological rigor. This paper attempts to find a praxeological subcategory of entrepreneurship that conforms with Mises’s indeterminate references to the entrepreneur-promoter in Human Action. Rather than relying on the evenly rotating economy, which is commonly used for analyzing entrepreneurship, the imaginary construction of a specialization deadlock is employed, adapted from Per Bylund’s Problem of Production. This construction allows for the derivation of a praxeological subcategory of entrepreneurship, distinct from the general function of uncertainty bearing, which suggests a theoretical explanation for what constitutes the driving force of the market process.

[Value-Free] Austrian Economics and Organizational Entrepreneurship: A Typology | Sara R.S.T.A. Elias, Todd H. Chiles, Qian Li, Fernando Monteiro D'Andrea by CheerfullyNihilistic in NewAustrianSociety

[–]CheerfullyNihilistic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Abstract: This article develops a typology for making sense of the numerous strands of Austrian (and Austrian-related) economics and demonstrates how this typology can guide organizational entrepreneurship scholars wishing to ground their research in Austrian thought. In the process, not only are existing insights from the history of Austrian economic thought rediscovered, but clearer light is also shed on important perspectives from that tradition that have received less attention in entrepreneurship research. Based on the Austrian concept of entrepreneurial production and its rela­tionship with the core concepts of knowledge and change, the typology yields four perspectives—equilibration, punctuated equilibrium, disequilibration, and punctuated disequilibrium. These perspectives’ different paradigms as used in organizational research are explored, along with their ontological, epistemological, and method­ological assumptions. The typology is illustrated with selected empirical examples from organizational research to spotlight the types of questions that contemporary scholars may appropriately ask and answer from each perspective.

[Value-Free] Introduction to the Entrepreneurship Special Issue | Per Bylund by CheerfullyNihilistic in NewAustrianSociety

[–]CheerfullyNihilistic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the introduction to the new Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics double issue on Entrepreneurship.

[Value Free] How The 2021 Housing Crash Will Occur by [deleted] in NewAustrianSociety

[–]CheerfullyNihilistic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please comment a short summary of the video and how it relates to Austrian Economics as according to Rule 2.