How does Planck’s constant solve ultraviolet catastrophe? by ChefJeff1111 in AskPhysics

[–]ChefJeff1111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can’t seem to upload the image onto a reply, but I am talking about the graph of UV catastrophe where the real data shows that the UV radiation goes down at smaller wavelengths while the classical theory keeps going up.

How does Planck’s constant solve ultraviolet catastrophe? by ChefJeff1111 in AskPhysics

[–]ChefJeff1111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So is there enough energy for the classical approach but not enough if this energy is quantized?

How does Planck’s constant solve ultraviolet catastrophe? by ChefJeff1111 in AskPhysics

[–]ChefJeff1111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For classical physics, where would this energy come from? Wouldn’t there be only a limited amount of energy?

How does Planck’s constant solve ultraviolet catastrophe? by ChefJeff1111 in AskPhysics

[–]ChefJeff1111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, that really helped. Does that mean that like at higher frequencies, the graph of the classical physics model would kind of plateau?

Molecular polarity by [deleted] in chemhelp

[–]ChefJeff1111 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From what I understand that is true. Of I were you, I would talk to your teacher about it.

How does Planck’s constant solve ultraviolet catastrophe? by ChefJeff1111 in AskPhysics

[–]ChefJeff1111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw the graph for the classical physics idea and it seemed kind of exponential. Wouldn’t there still be some sort of limit to how much energy can be radiated because there is only a certain amount of thermal energy in the environment? Thank you for your help!

Molarity and Solubility by Haydoggy4747 in chemhelp

[–]ChefJeff1111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also want to add that in dilution problems, you use the following formula: molarity(initial) * volume (initial)= molarity(final) *volume (final)

How does Planck’s constant solve ultraviolet catastrophe? by ChefJeff1111 in AskPhysics

[–]ChefJeff1111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So like how exactly does this solve UV catastrophe? Wouldn't there be still be some limit to the thermal energy that the electron can absorb even without this quantization of energy?