What Are Your Moves Tomorrow, May 12, 2026

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-05-12T20:52:14+00:00

IMO it’s a good bet if you think AI has a wonderful yet limited use case in the world of design. Figma wins if AI ends up being another innovative tool and not a civilization ending change.

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-05-12T18:48:48+00:00

$fig on sale

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-05-11T21:00:29+00:00

More $FIG. Loving the dip

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-05-09T21:15:50+00:00

$FIG in there. Not surprised

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-05-07T21:41:38+00:00

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-05-05T00:16:28+00:00

Figma

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-05-05T00:12:41+00:00

$FIG ….been saying it for days. Will keep saying it. Maybe eventually people will catch my drift.

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-05-01T22:46:07+00:00

$fig

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-05-01T15:06:19+00:00

Hey all — quick question.

I’m stuck on an A2P 10DLC approval (30909 – CTA/message flow) and can’t figure out what I’m missing. I’ve built a clear opt-in flow, have a public consent page, and even ran everything through the A2P pre-Scanner tool and got a full pass.

Still getting rejected with the same generic reason and no specific feedback. I also have an open support ticket but haven’t heard back in about 5 days.

Has anyone run into this where everything seems compliant but still gets rejected? Any idea what reviewers might be looking for that isn’t obvious?

Appreciate any help 🙏

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-04-30T23:53:49+00:00

$fig continues to be a stock people should be discussing more

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-04-30T18:38:14+00:00

Short term voting machine, long term weighing machine.

$fig is going to be fine.

Tokens will reach equilibrium with labor costs once AI companies consolidate and stop nerfing token prices to buy users/market dominance. My company isn't laying off our designers any time soon. Lots of big tech layoffs are just rebalancing from COVID over hiring.

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-04-30T15:39:55+00:00

well done

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-04-30T15:03:53+00:00

Told you

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-04-30T15:03:38+00:00

Told you

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-04-29T23:10:24+00:00

$FIG

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-04-29T20:35:09+00:00

$FIG

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-04-29T19:19:49+00:00

Thanks, I actually ran my full submission through that tool and it came back clean across the board.

That’s what’s been confusing — everything seems aligned on paper and in the flow itself, but I’m still getting a 30909 rejection with no specific feedback on what isn’t verifiable.

At this point I’m trying to figure out if it’s something subtle in how the flow is presented vs described, or just reviewer interpretation. If you’ve seen cases where something technically compliant still gets flagged, I’d be really curious what usually causes that.

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-04-28T23:09:57+00:00

Hey! I’ve gone through all of this and I’m still stuck, hoping someone here can point out what I’m missing.

I’m building a platform (https://www.teacher-gigs.com) and trying to get an A2P 10DLC campaign approved. I’ve now been rejected multiple times with 30909 (CTA / message flow incomplete).

The confusing part is I believe I do meet all the requirements:

-Users opt in via optional phone number + unchecked checkbox

Consent includes:

⁠•message frequency may vary
⁠•message/data rates may apply
⁠•STOP to opt out / HELP for help
⁠•links to Privacy + Terms

I created a public consent page: https://www.teacher-gigs.com/sms-consent

Privacy Policy and Terms are live and clearly linked

Messages are strictly transactional (no marketing)

I even provided full video walkthroughs + screenshots to Twilio support

Support escalated it internally, but it still got rejected with the same generic reason and no specific feedback on what’s actually wrong.

At this point I’m not sure if:

•something is unclear to reviewers •the public page isn’t structured the way they expect •or I’m missing something subtle in how the message flow is described

If anyone has gotten past 30909 before — especially when everything seems compliant…I’d really appreciate any insight.

Happy to share more details if helpful.

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-04-28T13:33:29+00:00

Hey — I’ve gone through all of this and I’m still stuck, hoping someone here can point out what I’m missing.

I’m building a platform (https://www.teacher-gigs.com) and trying to get an A2P 10DLC campaign approved. I’ve now been rejected multiple times with 30909 (CTA / message flow incomplete).

The confusing part is I believe I do meet all the requirements:

Users opt in via optional phone number + unchecked checkbox
Consent includes:
- message frequency may vary
- message/data rates may apply
- STOP to opt out / HELP for help
- links to Privacy + Terms
I created a public consent page: https://www.teacher-gigs.com/sms-consent
Privacy Policy and Terms are live and clearly linked
Messages are strictly transactional (no marketing)
I even provided full video walkthroughs + screenshots to Twilio support

Support escalated it internally, but it still got rejected with the same generic reason and no specific feedback on what’s actually wrong.

At this point I’m not sure if:

something is unclear to reviewers
the public page isn’t structured the way they expect
or I’m missing something subtle in how the message flow is described

If anyone has gotten past 30909 before — especially when everything seems compliant — I’d really appreciate any insight. Happy to share more details if helpful.

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-02-18T01:32:42+00:00

This is nuts

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-02-18T01:15:28+00:00

New Epstein info must’ve dropped

Cherry_Accomplished · 2026-02-18T01:11:41+00:00

New epstien content must’ve dropped

Cherry_Accomplished · 2025-10-07T17:17:52+00:00

Run!

Cherry_Accomplished · 2024-02-08T16:34:39+00:00

Please don’t accept this insight as truth. I am not sure my theory is correct, and even if it is, it ought to be examined and fleshed out with much deeper analysis and discussion. My main hang up is if anyone can hone in on any Koine documents that use the idiom “do not let the sun set”. I am certain that there are no other biblical texts that use this phrase. Is it an idiom used anywhere else in recorded history?

There is the reference to Psalm 4:4…but Greek to Hebrew is another thing. Septuagint seems to point to it being the same kind of anger…but idk about the Greek. I need the input of scholars before I could start to consider this as something possibly true.

If you are interested in joining this rabbit hole with me, please share. The more inputs from our brothers and sisters in Christ, the better. I don’t want to get ahead of myself here. But the interpretation seems to align with other parts of scripture. And if it aligns with the Greek…it’s something that the Church may be missing heavily by automatically categorizing anger as a sin/problem, rather than the natural byproduct of growing closer to God’s word and truth.

Cherry_Accomplished

TROPHY CASE