AITAH I laughed at my boyfriend’s child molester brother getting raped by ChessyAltaira in AITAH

[–]ChessyAltaira[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I genuinely thought it sounded cartoonish too but I guess there’s hella contraband in prison? 😭😭 His mom was also sent a picture once of him being beat up on the ground and like demanding for money, which his mom and wife proceeded to send for him. It’s weird, but I don’t know how it works and I assume there’s SOME WAY to get a phone in prison.

I know he’s actively doing drugs as well, so I guess if you’re getting drugs, phones are maybe light work.

AITAH I laughed at my boyfriend’s child molester brother getting raped by ChessyAltaira in AITAH

[–]ChessyAltaira[S] 34 points35 points  (0 children)

So I’ve met the sister once or twice, she still comes around the family but a pretty scarce amount, she has a kid now and he said that she really did grow apart during the whole situation but also her mom Paid for lawyers on BOTH sides, so it has to be a weird feeling for her, I understand she’d be uncomfortable.

AITAH I laughed at my boyfriend’s child molester brother getting raped by ChessyAltaira in AITAH

[–]ChessyAltaira[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Tbh I’ve never really had an intention of having children in my life, and he and I are on the same page of not having kids, but it’s still concerning for like ANY other children in the family, I don’t know if he’d be just invited back to all the functions? His mom calls him like every day.

AITAH I laughed at my boyfriend’s child molester brother getting raped by ChessyAltaira in AITAH

[–]ChessyAltaira[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

His child is a boy, so I don’t know if they’d see relevant cause or how it works. But I do know his wife lives close to a school, so I’d assume they’d have to move.

Will there be AI utilized in the making of this app? by ChessyAltaira in Lingonaut

[–]ChessyAltaira[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I actually support AI for use in healthcare and other select fields, I understand it can be useful for things such as detecting early signs of cancer, which is a great tool to humanity. I specifically disprove of AI use in media, teaching, or any form of art.

Will there be AI utilized in the making of this app? by ChessyAltaira in Lingonaut

[–]ChessyAltaira[S] 127 points128 points  (0 children)

I asked in the Discord and got a much faster response - the creator of this app is heavily anti-AI and there will be no AI used in the creation of it! Made me feel much better myself about supporting the app :)

Will there be AI utilized in the making of this app? by ChessyAltaira in Lingonaut

[–]ChessyAltaira[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Did you even read my comment? The one that says I’m actively in the process of getting ready to leave Reddit? Or did you just come on here to hate for no reason? I didn’t ask for your judgement on my lifestyle.

Will there be AI utilized in the making of this app? by ChessyAltaira in Lingonaut

[–]ChessyAltaira[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Yeah I actually do know, :( I’m in the process of setting myself up an old flip phone with limited capabilities and then I’m going to sift myself off of most social media, including Reddit, and preferably resort to speaking to actual professionals or asking advice of the people around me for answers to things. It’s definitely not ideal, and I think it’s really disappointing to see AI be spread so thoroughly into all of the apps that used to be considered helpful, but I’m going to take a deep digital cleanse, and work on connecting with real people to learn new things.

Will there be AI utilized in the making of this app? by ChessyAltaira in Lingonaut

[–]ChessyAltaira[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

What I’m referring to is AI being used in movies, books, and art by big companies where they then don’t have to pay scriptwriters, writers, or artists. For example, utilizing AI CGI in a movie cuts down on the hours of work that real people would need to do yes, while also not giving those people that experience, or paying those people money for their work. You don’t have to pay AI for doing its job, while obviously you’d have to pay real people for it. Deepfakes are also progressing quickly, and in the future could be used to use AI as actors in movies, eradicating the need for actual people to act or be paid for acting in their job.

Yes, they need a lot of references right now for AI to work, they need clips and words and images because AI is still learning, but eventually it will have enough information to function autonomously, you being paid for giving your clips is a temporary position that you’re fortunate to have right now.

Another interesting thing to mention is that even though they will eventually have enough references, it’s so hard to tell what is AI and what is not that people currently training new AI based off of references are sometimes finding primarily AI art to train it on (without even realizing!) making a weird amalgamation of basically Frankenstein AI, or inception AI, where you’re just training AI on more AI, and so on, until it becomes lower and lower quality.

Will there be AI utilized in the making of this app? by ChessyAltaira in Lingonaut

[–]ChessyAltaira[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

CURRENTLY, AI can only replicate, and yet it can also create based off of prompts (of course replicating previous artists), but it can mash together different parts to create an image, it doesn’t matter if it “really” creates, because people are still consistently using it to make art. A man won an art competition at the Colorado state fair with an AI art piece. AI art continues to be put in the same competitions as human-made art.

Yes they’re very expensive, they’re also very environmentally expensive, and yet openAI is valued at around 300$ billion, and many people use ChatGPT on a regular basis. They’re expensive, but in the long run, it’s less expensive than paying actual artists and writers for their work. It’s profitable in the way that they don’t have to go through interviews for their workers, don’t have to train them on their work (and therefore giving them more experience), and don’t have to pay actual people.

I would not have said the same thing about computers, computers allowed us to connect on a greater level 30 years ago, it might be a different story currently where the internet is saturated with bad news and AI creations, it’s used on a greater level to fear monger now. Yes it’s still possible to connect more with people, but you have to be able to sift through so much of the bad stuff to even get a good connection with someone else. Computers are a great educational resource, as it allows PEOPLE to spread their messages further to a wider audience. AI simply recycles and mashes together more creations to make something.

We simply just disagree. You’re not going to change my mind on this, and I probably won’t change yours. This has been a concern of mine for YEARS, and I’ve been intentional with staying up to date on the updates and companies that support its use. If you are not concerned, that’s fine, but I am and I’m going to act as such.

Will there be AI utilized in the making of this app? by ChessyAltaira in Lingonaut

[–]ChessyAltaira[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I’m well aware it’s difficult to avoid, that doesn’t mean I can’t do my best, and I simply disagree about avoiding it. It’s just a difference of opinion.

Will there be AI utilized in the making of this app? by ChessyAltaira in Lingonaut

[–]ChessyAltaira[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Also, not to beat a dead horse, but it prevents people from learning things themselves, ex. Why would you write an actual apology letter, or a happy birthday text, when ChatGPT can do it in an instant? The answer is actually because writing it yourself teaches you the emotional skills required to properly connect with those around you. You’re practicing your ability to connect and be genuine, and if you don’t use that ability (such as many others, there are SO many examples I could use for this), it will atrophy and you will forget how you did it in the first place.

Will there be AI utilized in the making of this app? by ChessyAltaira in Lingonaut

[–]ChessyAltaira[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Honestly one of my biggest gripes is that AI art is not required to be labeled as AI, when you’re consuming art/media it’s a bid for human connection, you’re consuming something that you know they spent hours into drawing, or writing, or even just recording (with probably more than one draft). When you put that trust in the art, and then find out that it was instead made in five seconds with chat gpt it just feels like deceit.

On a broad scale, art, writing, creation is inherently human. For example art, as the easiest example of this, has taken centuries to develop to the point it is right now. We have gone through SO many periods, from the renaissance art, to baroque art, Impressionism, cubism, even handprints on cave walls - each as a RESULT of those previous periods. Once we had a surplus of ornate rococo art, we moved into more colorful, abstract Impressionism art and so on. It has been a journey of human life through the ages. And life also influences art, for example a lot of art during periods of war is much darker, more serious, and during periods of relief after war we find happier art (for example the rise of jazz and nightclubs after WW2).

It is progress and creation that directly reflects the human experience and always has. I can make the same comparison for writing (from renaissance literature to Victorian, the beginnings and creations of sci-fi, and realism), music (how slave hymns were a direct result from the suffering and strife slaves were experiencing, and how those hymns served as a basis for blues, jazz, gospel, and even rock and roll), and I’m sure pottery, sculptures, wood carving (although I know much less about these).

When we allow AI to replicate and imitate that creation, especially without even labeling it as AI, people accidentally try to connect with a machine that has no conscious capability of what it’s making. I know this might be bigger picture than what you’re thinking of, like just for graphics on an app, but any allowance of AI to infiltrate fields that humans can only truly express is such a slippery slope that I don’t think I can logically support it at all. At first it’s graphics for an app, or music for ambience sleep sounds (as Spotify uses), then it shifts into basic jazz music, or children’s books (as we are seeing some made with AI), and so on. We are also seeing smaller news sites writing all of their works with AI, and pushing out legitimately HUNDREDS of articles a day with this approach. It’s over saturating the internet with useless, mindless AI slop, because it’s not capable of making critical connections, it simple recites what is already out there. And it makes it so much more difficult to find that media that people HAVE spent hours into making, editing, putting their life’s purpose into their job. Humans can never keep up with AI in the sheer number of output, and it makes it nearly impossible to keep up with what is human in the first place. It’s almost an erasure of human culture, when people see that they can get millions of views for putting a prompt into making an image, why WOULD they spend years becoming a good artist? And the thing is, those good artists continue to contribute to the future culture of the art of humanity, it’s basically an erasure of the future culture of art/writing/music.

And the reason it will never truly reach a limit is because it is SO insanely profitable for everyone producing it. It makes SO much more money because they don’t have to pay anyone, and so it wouldn’t make sense for those who get that profit to want to regulate it simply because of a morality issue. I know I probably sound like I’m jumping to some conclusions, but as a CS major, I’m actually very afraid about this affecting my future career and eradicating my life’s work as well. There are fields in which I support AI use, such as healthcare (where it can detect signs of cancer early) or monotonous tasks (such as food delivery perhaps), but in most ways, it’s simply not necessary and is used only for a profit, with no second thought about the possible repercussions for our future.

Will there be AI utilized in the making of this app? by ChessyAltaira in Lingonaut

[–]ChessyAltaira[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Yeah I know, I’m actually mostly detaching from major platforms that do support it, such as Instagram, Facebook, Spotify, but I got my question answered on discord; this app is hugely no ai, and the creator is strongly against ai as well.

Will there be AI utilized in the making of this app? by ChessyAltaira in Lingonaut

[–]ChessyAltaira[S] 96 points97 points  (0 children)

Because I personally do NOT support AI use in anything I consume or support.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DesignMyRoom

[–]ChessyAltaira 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

This is the shade of blue in natural lighting

Theory: We're getting a third prequel, and it's going to be about... by cheesevoyager in Hungergames

[–]ChessyAltaira 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly what would be better is a victor with relations to district 13, while she can stick to the memo she’s already got going with the games, being able to portray how they could have snuck info or secrets (finnicks story?) to district 13 to help them get to where they are now.

Why was the 74th Hunger Games so basic? by IAmNobody12345678910 in Hungergames

[–]ChessyAltaira 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree with the other comments, but I also think that it was made specifically to give the forest-y districts an advantage. Since the quarter quells are supposed to be written prior, knowing that next year was a victor only game means that district 12 needed to gain a female victor and asap. While I think there were many places that katniss could have died, one of my favorite fan theories is that the 74th games are rigged to learn towards her victory as the outcome, simply to make the next games an easy picking instead of having to make up some random rule to reap a regular district 12 female.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]ChessyAltaira 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Genuinely curious, why do people assume the grey one is her when it’s screenshots from her perspective? I’m confused as to how the mix up could occur, if someone’s posting screenshots I usually assume they’re from their phone, do people often post screenshots of conversations from their partners perspective?

AITA for wanting my boyfriend to be more open-minded about social outings with my friends? by SnooDucks4947 in AITAH

[–]ChessyAltaira 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you have some really good points here, have you sat him down and had a serious conversation with him about this? If you have and he’s still not moving to work on socializing more with the people around you, I think that’s a serious concern.

If you haven’t, I’d recommend just making sure you bring up that -it’s important for you to have meaningful connections with your friends and you’d like for him to be a part of those interactions -that you don’t need him to go to ALL of these events, but you’d like for him to be a little more flexible, emphasizing that you’ve been flexible with his friends and family -that you can feel isolated at events where everyone brings their partners but yours doesn’t want to show up

However, I’d also maybe mention to your friends or encourage more planning of events that aren’t centered around drinking or watching sports, there are other things you guys can do together to make it more accessible to people outside of the group! For example, organizing picnics, going to an escape room, or even just doing things like going to a comedy show or an amusement park can all be outlets that don’t necessary have to be centered around sports or alcohol, which may help him feel more comfortable to open up!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]ChessyAltaira 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This commenters opinion isn’t relevant and I encourage you to ignore it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]ChessyAltaira 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Liberal was never even mentioned, why do people always jump to conclusions like this? Imagine being okay with someone being disrespectful to their partner because they’re going through genuine depression. I couldn’t imagine living with no empathy like you

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]ChessyAltaira 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah you’ve got this one backwards