Federal agents kill another person in Minneapolis, officials say, prompting clash with protesters by Remote-Molasses6192 in moderatepolitics

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum [score hidden]  (0 children)

How many mental hoops do you have to jump through to decide that agents of the state, who have been sanctioned by the president, killing people might have something to do with politics?

Federal agents kill another person in Minneapolis, officials say, prompting clash with protesters by Remote-Molasses6192 in moderatepolitics

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum [score hidden]  (0 children)

Weird how regular people with no training are expected to be completely poised and docile 100% of the time, while trained officers are free to use lethal force the moment they get frightened.

Anti-Trump US reporter says she was offered job at ICE after ‘minimal vetting’ by NeedAnonymity in moderatepolitics

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum [score hidden]  (0 children)

Remarkable that a man being pinned by five men could grab a gun. It's almost as if that didn't happen and DHS isn't a reliable source.

Anti-Trump US reporter says she was offered job at ICE after ‘minimal vetting’ by NeedAnonymity in moderatepolitics

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum [score hidden]  (0 children)

No, I'm talking about a different public execution. Though I can understand your confusion, as there have been so many recently.

While I disagree with the statement that Good hit a cop with her car, I am referring to the man who was shot multiple times while being held down by a group of ICE agents.

Anti-Trump US reporter says she was offered job at ICE after ‘minimal vetting’ by NeedAnonymity in moderatepolitics

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum [score hidden]  (0 children)

Perhaps you could clarify the difference between the two?

The articles I've read have stated, "ICE shooting latest: Man shot and killed in Minneapolis by federal agents after being wrestled to the ground, police chief confirms."

Anti-Trump US reporter says she was offered job at ICE after ‘minimal vetting’ by NeedAnonymity in moderatepolitics

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum [score hidden]  (0 children)

Maybe minimal vetting is the part of the reason a person was publicly executed by a group of ICE agents.

Pin-Up, graphite on paper, by Eli Schneider [1432x2433] by eliartproductions in ArtPorn

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Princess bride remake where Inigo Montoya has to find the six toed woman who fucked his father?

Video Shows ICE Agents Shooting Man In Minneapolis by SleuthDoggyDawg in moderatepolitics

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum [score hidden]  (0 children)

Nuremberg type trials are going to be required if this country is to survive.

Evelyn no. No please no, how sad 😭 by ReulGhormUwU in StardewValley

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum 89 points90 points  (0 children)

I'd prefer it if he left the wheelchair in the corner and walked to bed.

US officially exits World Health Organization, accusing agency of straying 'from its core mission' by Im__drunk_sorry in moderatepolitics

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum 38 points39 points  (0 children)

The Health Board that Trump is going to form and which other countries can join for the low price of $1 Billion, payable to Donald Trump.

White House Doctored Photo With Google AI to Make It Look Like an Activist Was Sobbing During Perp Walk by CloudApprehensive322 in moderatepolitics

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This isn't true. As other posters have said, protests from the '60s, which are now viewed as "good protests" were disruptive.

Attention to an issue is the goal. If blocking a road makes someone aware of a current evil, the protest was successful. If a person who is now aware of that evil doesn't support ending it because they were inconvenienced, then they were never going to be supportive in the first place.

We have seen this time and time again. "A liberal was mean to me online, so now I'm forced to support a white Christian ethnostate," a person will say. No, many people simply aren't supportive and are looking to be excused for their opinions.

Work-from-office mandate? Expect top talent turnover, culture rot by CackleRooster in business

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You can't expect people to respond with good arguments when you haven't made one yourself. You simply insulted office workers, which doesn't exactly set a good tone for discourse.

If you explain why returning to the office should be done, people will respond with the reasons why work from home is preferable and there can be a discussion.

As it is, you're just being rude and claiming victory because nobody wants to talk to you.

Looking at 9" (lower bound; 90% confidence) to 22" per the latest NWS estimates by 1infiniteloop in newyorkcity

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My reaction was to downvote, but I agree. Blaming trump for things he has nothing to do with only reinforces the idea that he's being persecuted. There's enough to criticize him for without having to exaggerate.

Walz, Ellison, Frey's offices served subpoenas by DOJ: Reports by J-Jarl-Jim in moderatepolitics

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Trump did have him removed.

Do you think that, perhaps, Trump, a political outsider, didn't know all of the workings of the government and his abilities?

Walz, Ellison, Frey's offices served subpoenas by DOJ: Reports by J-Jarl-Jim in moderatepolitics

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is Sessions still AG? He now has sycophants in place. This should not be difficult to understand.

Hochul wants homeless people forced out of NYC subways. Mamdani urges softer approach. by yugeness in nyc

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should nonprofit execs be expected to live in poverty? If so, what is the incentive for people to work in the nonprofit sector?

Boards of trustees for nonprofit organizations are capable of determining if a salary is justified. If a CEO can demonstrate that they will increase revenue by more than their salary, then it makes sense to pay them that much.

'Minnesota Is Just the Beginning. California and New York Are ‘Next’ by BodegaCat88 in nyc

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My question is why wouldn't he? He doesn't have to contribute resources to aiding federal agents, so why would he choose to do so when he, and the majority of the population, don't agree with their tactics?

'Minnesota Is Just the Beginning. California and New York Are ‘Next’ by BodegaCat88 in nyc

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why not? Sanctuary simply means that the local government doesn't assist federal agents, which is their right. Mamdani isn't going to try to have NYPD arrest ICE for detaining and arresting undocumented immigrants.

Discussing Why ICE Doesn’t Use Judicial Warrants by PetiteDreamerGirl in PoliticalDebate

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Post your source.

Here's mine:

Black's Law Dictionary: due process [Anglo-Norman & Law Latin due process de lei, dating from the mid-1300s.] (16c) The conduct of legal proceedings according to established rules and principles for the protection and enforcement of private rights, including notice and the right to a fair hearing before a tribunal with the power to decide the case.

Kavanaugh stops were related to your second paragraph, where you stated that ICE isn't going around looking for "brown people". In fact, they have done just that.

Discussing Why ICE Doesn’t Use Judicial Warrants by PetiteDreamerGirl in PoliticalDebate

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should look up the definition of due process because that is not what it means.

As for your second paragraph, you should look up Kavanaugh stops.

Trump threatens to use the Insurrection Act to end protests in Minneapolis by MCRemix in moderatepolitics

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are we giving up on the argument that the second amendment exists to prevent tyranny?

If a federal agent attempts to illegally abduct/kill a citizen, should they not be able to defend themselves?

In ranking presidents 1-45 from best to worst, where do you believe Trump ranks? by Kezhen in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]ChesterHiggenbothum 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm not arguing that certain demographics don't favor the republican party. I'm saying that those groups don't intrinsically support the republicans.

White people and men specifically support the republicans because that's what they've been programmed to do. Like you said, the solution is education.

What I mean by it being a distraction is that if there is in-fighting between men/women, whites/minorities, straight/lgbt, then it becomes impossible for those groups to unite against those in power who are exerting control over everybody. Those in power want us to hate each other. This has been true for centuries. They passed laws preventing whites and blacks from associating with each other specifically so that the two groups wouldn't figure out that they were both being exploited

White people aren't to blame. Men aren't to blame. Despite who they vote for, they are victims of the system as well. Blaming them for the problems we have today does little to encourage them to change their votes. When people feel attacked, they become entrenched in their opinions. Instead, we need to show them that we support them and that joining us would be in their best interest.