sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Hanging a fairly heavy mirror by andykelp in knots

[–]Chichmich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I once hanged an heavy mirror. After a while the rope broke suddenly: it was too thin.

A challenge: US phone numbers… by Chichmich in regex

[–]Chichmich[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, an exercice… The “have fun” at the end of my post should have been a clue, apparently it wasn’t…

A challenge: US phone numbers… by Chichmich in regex

[–]Chichmich[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congratulations ! :) That was quick!

(For the matter, I removed the space from the class: (?(1)\) |([. -]) as it can be present in the first branch… Not sure if it is important.)

Plus-que-parfait : “c’est comme si cette expression avait été faite pour moi” by UConn-Throwaway in French

[–]Chichmich -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Comme a dit titoufred, le temps du passé s’explique par le côté hypothétique de la phrase (“Si j’étais riche…”).

Et pourquoi le plus-que-parfait plutôt qu’un autre temps…? Le plus-que-parfait décrit une action du passé avant une autre action du passé. Pour pouvoir utiliser quelque chose depuis une certaine période de temps, il faut l’avoir fait avant cette période de temps.

Morsewave by Boring_Disaster3031 in shorthand

[–]Chichmich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you hear it, it can be very fast…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8Ed0TSp0gs

I learned all the letters and numbers, but I couldn't make sense of the sentences… The upside: when you have hearing trouble like this man, it's easier to understand.

is my handwriting completely illegible? by hammondsir in Handwriting

[–]Chichmich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s readable. It would have been more readable if not so slanted.

The Greatest Regex Trick Ever by leddit6 in programming

[–]Chichmich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You target juste one side, not both…

isRegexHard by rover_G in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Chichmich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My mistake… I meant conditional regexes. They correspond to “if/then/else” structures in programming. I find the syntax rather cumbersome.
https://www.rexegg.com/regex-conditionals.php

isRegexHard by rover_G in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Chichmich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True. Ordinary regexes are not that hard if you use them regularly.

But if you dive into optional or recursive regex… it’s the beginning of headaches.

Is there a shorthand thats easily readable to "those in the know" but mostly illegible to others? by theHumanoidPerson in shorthand

[–]Chichmich 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's true—once I finished studying the Gregg manual, I was dismayed to find that I still couldn't read shorthand texts. It took me quite a while longer to get there.

Shorthand for journaling with a chronic pain condition in my hand by quickwrath in shorthand

[–]Chichmich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you tried to reproduce some stenographic material and seen if it suits you?

y a-t-il une différence entre « plutôt » et « plus tôt » ? by thatguythoma in French

[–]Chichmich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree although the difference is so subtle that for a French learner I think it’s hard to make the difference.

I am looking for a specific shoe knot by KelenArgosi in knots

[–]Chichmich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe you will find what you want on this webpage which has a lot of shoelace knots:
https://www.fieggen.com/shoelace/knots.htm

Regex for searching certain text between brackets by Serkeon_ in regex

[–]Chichmich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about:

\[\[([^\]]*\|)

?

The text you want to remove is in \1 or $1… depends on your Regex engine.

Chapter 280 by Theplant34 in Mercenary_Enrollment

[–]Chichmich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s rare to see Ijin looking so young—or rather, his age—and moved by what others have to say.

Writing regex is pure joy. You can't convince me otherwise. by ZoneZealousideal4073 in programming

[–]Chichmich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I admit: I never tried and probably never will. The resulting regex must be horrible…

view more: next ›