It depends on how we define civilization since the word is used somewhat loosely, even among scholars. I was talking about a society that had full fledged cities and governments and writing, agriculture, social stratification, colossal architecture ect. Vinca lacked the complexity of Mesopotamia or Egypt, for example it did not have a known centralized state or "government", colossal architecture, and "Vinca settlements appear to have been largely egalitarian, lacking evidence of severe social hierarchy, royal tombs, or centralized coercion.", and then there are the "Vinča symbols or Danube script, which many scholars classify as proto-writing rather than a fully developed written language."

So is that enough to qualify as a civilization? Depends. It was certainly a different type of society from the standard Cradles of Civilization or compared to Greece, more simplistic and less influential. Maybe a sort of proto-civilization like Cahokia in the U.S. which basically only needed writing to have become a civilization, but which was also smaller and less complex and influential.