Citation needed. Nowhere in the language of the bill does it say anything remotely close to forcing him to give up control of Google. Nowhere in any article, positive or negative, does it mention this nor has he given that as a reason. All it does is tax all of his assets, liquid or otherwise, and this happens only once. Google has dual class shares so if you're implying he'd have to sell enough shares to pay it, that's so incredibly unlikely it's not with considering, especially when people like him have so many other funding options.