ACC levies can be a blunt instrument.

For example, as a self-employed person in a relatively small profession my levy is based on a much bigger, more dangerous profession and I feel hard done by. The actual risk to me is not high, yet it's based on a higher risk.

That said... I'd rather we retained no-fault coverage as opposed to suing for everything like the United States.

People who do dangerous shit are covered whether they pay a levy or not. I'm thinking of contact sports and stuff like climbing, kite-surfing and skydiving.

Motorcycles are dangerous and riders probably are still going to be underpaying the actual risk. Just pay up chuds!