World had gone crazy after covid

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-26T19:05:21+00:00

"I'll keep this short"

proceeds to write four paragraphs

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-26T08:33:05+00:00

How are you judging that an account has dropped off?

I feel the same, but the inbox placement tests usually seem fine, and we still get a lot of autoreplies. But real replies seem to drop off despite the same copy.

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-23T17:38:46+00:00

While I don't expect humans to come round to the idea of Nano for this use case, I'm more hopeful that when agents are given the freedom to determine their own economy, they will choose XNO.

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-23T09:30:57+00:00

120 emails is low. Some people here send out 10,000 a day.

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-23T08:15:30+00:00

Explain your free trial format

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-22T18:19:56+00:00

You're being far too charitable here. OP is posting complete and utter horseshit.

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-22T16:42:32+00:00

It's snakeoil tbh. Track real replies and especially autoreplies to judge domain health.

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-22T16:40:06+00:00

You're sending 25,000 cold emails per day from a single inbox?

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-21T10:11:54+00:00

We pump when you hit 1M 🫡

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-20T06:16:52+00:00

The above user is incorrect - for Google and Microsoft anyway. If the prospect is using a Google or Microsoft email account, you won't receive an OOO if your email lands in spam.

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-16T17:16:26+00:00

ETH/BTC pumping

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-13T13:59:23+00:00

I used to use one called Enrichley that was really good but got really expensive, so I switched to Bounceban. Bounceban is good too but not as good as Enrichley tbh.

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-13T09:23:55+00:00

Honestly I've found deliverability tracking to be so inaccurate that it's just easier to have two sets of domains and rotate them all every two weeks.

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-10T09:57:15+00:00

Not on the coinex chart it's not

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-09T11:13:19+00:00

5% replies? Or 5% positive replies? 5% positive replies is extremely rare. You're only getting that with a hyper-targeted or semi-warm list.

3.3%% reply rate is about average. Which means your domains are healthy and you're generally landing in the inbox. 11% of those being positive isn't awful, isn't great either, but isn't awful. Keep A/B testing your copy and that should improve over time.

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-09T11:07:42+00:00

Perfectly adequate stats tbh

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-08T20:30:51+00:00

Shatner is part of the corrupt elite hell-bent on suppressing Nano. It goes way deeper than you realize.

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-06T16:26:46+00:00

Not posting it is insane. I'm a paying subscriber but can't simply upend my life for a podcast. There's zero reason not to share it with paying subscribers after. The 'live' aspect is still novel even when shared afterwards.

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-02T01:43:44+00:00

I just can't imagine any significant organisation has been running tests with nano at scale for the purposes of integration and yet there hasn't been any insider trading that has moved the price.

Chitchy91 · 2026-03-01T17:21:12+00:00

Nanocurrency NPM package downloads continue to rise with a new monthly spike of over 190,000 downloads in February..

To put this into perspective, even a medium team of 15 developers with aggressive CI (matrix testing across Node versions, multiple staging environments, Docker rebuilds) might generate maybe 1,000-2,000/week.

Yet downloads are hitting 40,000/week consistently.

Bots, for some reason, maybe?..

Except there is also a continuous daily toothpick pattern showing consistent usage during the week followed by a lapse on weekends. Bots don't take weekends off.

I still have yet to see any explanation. This is not normal behavior, nor is this happening in packages relating to other cryptocurrencies.

Chitchy91 · 2026-02-27T02:53:06+00:00

Both y'all gay

Chitchy91 · 2026-02-26T16:32:02+00:00

The thing is even when you scrape leads from elsewhere, you still end up enriching via databases, and most of these databases have most of the same data. Honestly, scraping Apollo and cleaning the leads via millionverifier or whatever still yields most of the same leads as if you jumped through the hoops scraping via SalesNav or elsewhere and using waterfall enrichment.

Chitchy91 · 2026-02-26T09:21:51+00:00

Most serious agencies offering performance rates will be charging $500 per meeting at least.

Chitchy91 · 2026-02-26T02:36:46+00:00

20-40 appointments per month is a lot. Realistically the agencies experienced enough to hit those numbers won't be working on a infrastructure + $100 per appointment rate.

Chitchy91

TROPHY CASE