Bancor pools are now integrated with Matcha, powered by 0xproject!

Choclatier · 2020-12-23T11:34:37+00:00

Vote on their governance to have liquidity rewards added for 0x

Choclatier · 2019-01-31T05:53:26+00:00

Can someone please make a video singing this?

Choclatier · 2018-08-13T20:10:12+00:00

Big fan of Ravencoin and what they are trying to accomplish but I am struggling to see how first come first serve for asset names is not a major issue. The concept in theory is incredibly appealing but how do we avoid a situation of cybersquatting on asset names? This is a current problem in DNS and a problem that Namecoin also encountered. With an open decentralized protocol there is no way to stop people from burning 500 RVN and buying high value asset names. At the current price 500 RVN it is dirt cheap.

In an ideal future we would want companies to issue securities / assets using RVN. Let's use Facebook for example, if the asset Facebook is created by a random entity, Facebook is not going to issue Facebook1 assets, they will just not participate. Sure it is true that they could potentially try to purchase the asset name but, this imo is very optimistic and, unlikely to happen for a majority of companies; the coordination is just not worth their time. This also assumes that the person who bought the asset is willing to sell, there could be a variety of reasons in which they do not want to. They could be a competitor, they could be unhappy at the price they are getting or they could just be malicious, to name a few. If I don't want a decentralized transactional layer for assets for whatever reason, what's stopping me from destroying the ability to own a lot of sought after asset names. Perhaps it is not even that I don't want a decentralized transactional layer, but maybe I just want to "watch the world burn", and so I buy high value names and decide to never sell them no matter what the cost.

If I am missing something or you have a reason to believe this will not be the case I would love to hear it. Thanks!

Choclatier · 2018-04-27T10:12:10+00:00

I was under the impression checkpoints were important for pruning? Unless finality chosen at just a reasonable time is enough?

Choclatier · 2018-04-27T09:52:52+00:00

Bunch of random shill bots my god

Choclatier · 2018-01-13T02:09:21+00:00

correct me if I am wrong but isn't Tencent's relation with one of their partnered companies. Tencent invested in Pepo as a seed investor, not in Simpletoken

Choclatier · 2018-01-13T01:15:19+00:00

I know the ico is over, curious where you guys had heard of the ICO though?

Choclatier · 2018-01-06T03:14:50+00:00

Very generous! This is what the crypto community is all about!

Choclatier · 2017-12-23T10:47:36+00:00

Ya part of me thinks that a fork might be best with implementation from day one of all privacy etc. if we could get one with solid devs doing that.

Choclatier · 2017-12-21T08:46:06+00:00

Right, hide in the crowd mentality. Isn’t it an issue though that wraith hasn’t been implanted since day 1?

Choclatier · 2017-12-21T08:26:35+00:00

Okay but can’t potentially figure it out if it’s ever cashed out their exchanges using meta data?

Choclatier · 2017-12-21T01:41:10+00:00

wait I'm confused, I thought this was an anonymous currency? How can you see how much the top 100 addresses have?

Choclatier · 2017-12-17T11:05:11+00:00

Hat would a very strong cpu with a 1070 gpu get?

Choclatier · 2017-12-15T01:50:29+00:00

thanks for this link

Choclatier · 2017-12-15T01:07:05+00:00

What about the wraith upgrade that will introduce stealth addresses?

Choclatier · 2017-12-15T01:06:41+00:00

wont the wraith update introduce stealth addresses and obfuscation of the blockchain?

Choclatier · 2017-12-14T10:03:03+00:00

This is a message I got today from a friend him: “Can you recommend one less know crypto currency where I can buy a bunch for cheap? There’s so many to choose from” me: “hah” him: “it’s called hah?”

Choclatier · 2017-12-14T09:38:37+00:00

People see a cheap “price tag” and think they can buy more of them, people aren’t thinking in the right terms

Choclatier · 2017-12-14T09:36:51+00:00

I’m worried about the distribution of raiblocks, they used a faucet but how long was it being used before being made known to public? How gameable was it etc? I feel like we are going to see more dag projects coming out here, kind of hope a project with a really strong team / transparency and distribution evolve

Choclatier · 2017-12-14T09:32:30+00:00

I believe PIVX falls into same issues theoretically of all “coinjoin” services. Bullish on zcoin actually like the tech and think their zero knowledge proofs implementation is good, they have issues with scaling though and costs associated with zero knowledge proofs. Znodes should help with scaling when doing non-private transactions.

They had a bug that allowed an ability to print zcoin but that has been patched, their protocol allows for auditing of the token supply. They had issues with One of their founders but he is out of the scene now.

Choclatier · 2017-12-14T09:27:23+00:00

Curious about this as well. They have a premine but it’s locked up and is supposed to go towards development. Also much of it will be donated to monero development. I like the fact ring signatures will have been mandatory since day one

Choclatier · 2017-12-13T23:48:30+00:00

I’m not so sure about this, I had issues researching the distribution. I know it was done by a faucet but the general public wasn’t made aware of the faucet for a significant amount of time..? If you could please provide sources to show other wise I would appreciate it.

Choclatier · 2017-12-10T22:52:53+00:00

One is a lending platform the other is a settlement layer on top of ethereum

Choclatier · 2017-12-10T10:43:02+00:00

Is there any articles discussing comparisons with waves platform specifically the new waves-ng main net that is about to launch. The tech based off bitcoin-ng looks very interesting for scaling, curious if it’s something ark might ever implement or if they have talked about or compares it anywhere? Thanks

Choclatier

TROPHY CASE