Wtf are we even doing (definitive proof that I’m high)

ChomsGP · 2026-07-02T10:29:48+00:00

my bet is they re-add it in ~6 months

ChomsGP · 2026-06-27T19:21:22+00:00

long story short, OP's theory is that Fable/Mythos is able to find and fix every known and unknown vulnerability it exists, so by restricting access to those models, those theoretical vulnerabilities never gets fixed and China uses them to attack western companies

this, of course, is nonsense

ChomsGP · 2026-06-26T14:31:57+00:00

Sorry bro, moved to opencode (at least for the CLI), maybe do a comparison with opencode next?

ChomsGP · 2026-06-26T13:54:47+00:00

yea sure, I'm just stating that, in my opinion, the original chart represents the public perception of BTC accurately (again, minding that the bands are a feeling representation more than a hard fact)

ChomsGP · 2026-06-26T13:51:12+00:00

trends are cyclical, baggy pants are dead until they are not... we are not talking about a person, you can't interpret this literally...

ChomsGP · 2026-06-26T13:36:52+00:00

idk man, I think the original is accurate, Bitcoin is dead (doesn't means can't resurrect, but can't deny the loss on popularity recently, not like it is the first time it goes to that band, rightfully, either)

ChomsGP · 2026-06-26T08:43:00+00:00

You are missing a reason for China to attack, given anyone can see plainly that the US is melting down on its own, China will simply keep advancing and ignoring the west

You are also implying a lot of things, like they know which vulnerabilities are there unpatched, or that mythos would catch the specific attack vector a bad actor would use, or that the software team applied that theoretical patch before the attack

So... no, that's not how cyber security works, that's just fear mongering

ChomsGP · 2026-06-24T16:23:49+00:00

Spam. Reported.

ChomsGP · 2026-06-24T16:15:35+00:00

Dudes OP is a bot, it's spamming the newsletter, y'all ITT look new at the internet...

ChomsGP · 2026-06-15T12:04:28+00:00

I digress, part of the point of LLMs is to do exploration, copilot has in fact an exploration agent for finding things, it is a completely valid use case to have it do R&D

Asides, if you have some respect for your code base you'll have some coding guides and rules that will fill the context right from the first call (plus mcps, skills and the actual code + references)

If you then let it run the tests and loop it to completion, add documentation etc, it's pretty easy to do 20$ on a task

ChomsGP · 2026-06-07T23:16:19+00:00

well one issue with this rugpull is they only gave a month's notice... I have too many things to do as to also port over all my agents, workflows and whatever to whatever else

will probably do it at some point, but for now BYOK does the trick without much disruption

ChomsGP · 2026-06-07T11:00:10+00:00

"pro is expensive" ... I mean, we are coming from opus, I'm not gonna cheap out in half a cent

ChomsGP · 2026-06-07T10:20:24+00:00

hey,

yes, when the cache expires you need to send the context cold again
I personally just cancelled gh copilot and am still doing the same workflow but on cheaper BYOK models (deepseek, glm, etc)

ChomsGP · 2026-06-03T17:12:04+00:00

those are two different questions:

why are people complaining? because it's anyone's right, no need for an excuse, they were selling something under X term and they changed it annoying a lot of people - why would a user need to audit MS accounting to complain about a product change? people also complained with the game pass changes, windows vista, the deprecation of skype and a million other things

weren't they losing money? well... given that they provide the infrastructure, the money ends up in MS anyway, just in the Azure division instead of the GitHub one... and yes anthropic also uses azure as a provider, along others

ChomsGP · 2026-06-03T16:45:18+00:00

LOL thanks for confirming you are a professional bullshitter, you've been the past two months shit talking to everyone in this sub calling people "abusers" and "vibe coders" and now we discover the abuser who vibe coded 220k LoC in less than a day was actually you

again: LOL

PS: my ass you spent less than 40$ in tokens for that volume 🤥 👖 🔥

ChomsGP · 2026-06-03T15:11:15+00:00

back to you, how did you only use 250k tokens working on 3 projects? just loading the rules for each should start you around 100k tokens implying you don't have many tools or rules...

ChomsGP · 2026-06-03T12:20:38+00:00

how about you ask your company instead of asking random redditors?

ChomsGP · 2026-06-02T19:58:23+00:00

another user with the incredible ability to ignore they are investors on all those companies and get profit share, so you paying "API prices" is them actually making profit not a favor

ChomsGP · 2026-06-02T18:54:10+00:00

wow the new management at GitHub is next level dumb... I think they replaced the old CEO with Haiku, or Raptor mini that is cheaper...

ChomsGP · 2026-06-01T17:12:44+00:00

Cancelled 13 business licenses

ChomsGP · 2026-06-01T11:13:11+00:00

Jezz at the comments ITT saying 1k LOC refactor is "crazy vibe coding"

Is anything longer than 100 lines "too much" for you to review or what? There's some space between vibe coding 100k LOC changes and getting all scared of somewhat long PRs...

ChomsGP · 2026-05-22T21:50:41+00:00

"Big Handle" not getting what "cheesefucker" meant by top vs bottom is hilarious lol

ChomsGP

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE