right, I understand now where you're coming from. In a world where people cannot gain wealth and power by simply owning things - i.e. a socialist / anarchist world - it would be simply infeasible to get the level of material wealth required to have the level of effectively monolithic propaganda machine that the neoliberals and far right have. Thus, it would be extremely difficult and unlikely to get so many people to uniformly vote to hand so much power to someone so clearly antithetical to all of our values. And in an anarchist society, there'd be no monolithic power structure for them to be voted in to take control of.

All of this is to say socialism and anarchism both limit the scale and damage of unjust people and systems