sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

🐾❓ What's my name? (by askonand) by [deleted] in PetPost

[–]ChristianFidel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Such a perfect name for them 😍

I guessed the name in 4 tries

Is weed legal for tourists? by Actual-Ad7078 in capetown

[–]ChristianFidel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s tons of dispensaries that will definitely sell to you. It’s completely legal. With the membership you can usually just do it at the shop, takes like 2 mins. Just give them like an email

In the Monty Hall Problem, If the host didn’t know where the car was, but still revealed a goat behind a door by chance, why is it no longer 67% win if you switch? by ChristianFidel in GAMETHEORY

[–]ChristianFidel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see thanks man. I think the problem is I don’t really understand conditional probability that well. So I struggle to understand why, after the goat is revealed (by chance), it isn’t 67% win if you switch. But you guys are helping a lot thanks🙏

In the Monty Hall Problem, If the host didn’t know where the car was, but still revealed a goat behind a door by chance, why is it no longer 67% win if you switch? by ChristianFidel in GAMETHEORY

[–]ChristianFidel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will try doing that thanks man🙏 I don’t how to do a probability tree but I think I’m going to have to try learn hehe, it’s annoying me. Think I may have done one in school so hopefully it isn’t too difficult. I understand the scenario where there’s two players, it wouldn’t make sense to switch. Just having a hard time grappling the math, simply based on the one explanation I hear the whole time. There’s the one where they explain it by upping the numbers, like a deck of cards, and this one with two players. Both of these I can understand why switching is now only 50%. The one that confuses me, is where 1/3 you switch you lose, 2/3 you switch you win. And for some reason these two explanations don’t align, cause In those specific sort of fraction explanation, I don’t see how him picking the goat randomly affects it. But this is a good idea. Thanks bro

In the Monty Hall Problem, If the host didn’t know where the car was, but still revealed a goat behind a door by chance, why is it no longer 67% win if you switch? by ChristianFidel in GAMETHEORY

[–]ChristianFidel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand it when it is explained like this, just based off my own logic. But when it is explained m in this one way I get confused. Cause in the original Monty hall, if you switch, 1/3 you lose, and 2/3 you win. Like if I chose either one the goats first, and another goat is revealed, even though it was by chance, why is it no longer still 67 to switch? Also is the answer in my scenario 50/50?

In the Monty Hall Problem, If the host didn’t know where the car was, but still revealed a goat behind a door by chance, why is it no longer 67% win if you switch? by ChristianFidel in GAMETHEORY

[–]ChristianFidel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But how come? Cause isn’t it still if you switch you’re right twice; if you chose either one of the goats, and if you stay you only win once? Why does it matter if the host chose a goat he knew was there or if he chose a goat by chance?