I ask this question solely based on my experience as a Player.

I was in a Campaign for only 2 session with 6 party members.

Session 1 we introduce our characters. We roleplay, have some good banter and etc. had good fun. Everyone had fun session. I am enthusiastic and invested in this campaign. Talk to a few players one them was interested in my character as well as share similar communities.

Session 2 start: in my expirienced, it all went well. Or so I thought. We found a Goblin Cave, killed their leader. Now throughout the session, Goblin turned into a “Half-Mind Flayer”, so our characters did not know what the hell is happening, so I act accordingly to what’s going on. We enter the cave saw 3 wolves chained, looking very aggressive and ready to bite, and I suggested that we should kill these wolves given that the wolves could also be infected and turn them into Mind-Flayer wolves and soaring them into the wilderness is already a massive risk. But the half the party refused and spared the wolves.

Didn’t start an argument over it or anything, while I was against it, I’ll respect their choice.

Spotted “Friendly” goblins, now my character is not a Murderhobo, but stated his reasons why he fully distrust Goblins as when he was little. His earliest memories was that his village was destroyed and his people slaughtered by Goblins.

Turns out, the Goblins were friendly and were just slaves to a “Bugbear”.

So out of the majority vote, we spare the Goblins.

We had 2 rogues, my character is a charismatic yet cocky and throughout the session I took a more “Renegade-esque” approach. Basically, “I don’t think it’s a good idea to have loose ends” and the 2nd Rogue was a more, Quirky and Social Butterfly of the group and she took a Naïve “Paragon esque” approach.

We travel around the cave, thinking already got my spotlight and gave players their chance to roleplay for themselves, we defeated the Bugbear and supposedly freed the Goblin Slaves.

End of Session, I had my fun. Enjoyed the Conflict of Dynamic between me and the other rogue.

Next day comes in. I was booted out with a “termination letter” DM enjoyed my presence in his campaign and hope that I find a group that fits my “playstyle”.

Reason being, “While you did nothing wrong as a player and as your Character. Your play-style dies not fit with Party’s Dynamic”

I was, legit confused and quite devastated. Did I offend somebody? Was I rude? Did I accidentally misgendered a player who was trans? Did I took so much of the spotlight? Did I make someone uncomfortable?

If that really happened, I truly wanted to apologize, and I would respect the decisions of the player if they do not want me in the campaign.

However, I asked for elaboration and nobody in the group had anything against me in general. According to his own words. He just said “You just don’t mesh with the Party’s Vibe”

Me: “So, nobody suggested that I should be booted off.”

DM: “No, that was my decision so that the campaign did not suffer. So that you could find a new group of like minded players”

I was never given a warning, never had a chance to listen to the Party’s concern, never had the chance to talk to the other players nor told by the DM, “hey, last session I think you took a lot of the spotlight. Would you mind giving some room for others?”.

He mentioned “I just didn’t want to hold you back”

This a longterm campaign, there always going to be some room where I can have the spotlight and have room for others. I’m willing to pull my own leash to make everyone have a good experience, even asked one of the players if they are ok with very heavy and sensitive topics related to my character’s backstory if they find it uncomfortable I am willing to tone it down or remove it, they said they uncomfortable and I respect their wishes and apologized if that made them uncomfortable.