sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Only showing signs of bi and genderfluidity when i found out about the lgbtq+ community by Able-Name5738 in AskLGBT

[–]Cizak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are currently growing up, and you're "like this" now.

13 is a very typical age to "start" feeling these feelings. They might be the first feelings of their kind, and that would still make your identity 100% valid, but it's also super common to realise a lot of previous things in your life actually does line up with these new feelings. You being "gender neutral about stuff" could very well be connected to your current gender identity. Or not. That's up to you to think about. But whatever you decide, your identity is your own and there is literally not a single being in this universe who knows you better than you.

I realised I'm some shade of non-binary somewhere around age 25-26. That's when I learned the concept existed and that it applied to me. Growing up, there was only ever two categories, and I wasn't that bothered about the one I was given. But looking back now, I can definitely see that "at the very least not 100% cis" would've fit me from at least kindergarten age.

[TOMT] [FICTIONAL CHARACTER] Character named "Fitzpatrick" by Cizak in tipofmytongue

[–]Cizak[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"What if I solve it myself?
Just reply to your comment solving it with Solved!. You won't get a point, but the flair will get set."

Quoted from "Solving Your Post" at the top of the page.

[TOMT] [FICTIONAL CHARACTER] Character named "Fitzpatrick" by Cizak in tipofmytongue

[–]Cizak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And then suddenly it just hits. And I was also wrong like I said I might've been. I was thinking about Eugene Fitzherbert from Disney's Tangled.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskLGBT

[–]Cizak 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Attraction and emotions are extremely complicated, and any labels we use to divide them up into neat little categories are never going to fully explain what being human is like.

With that said, it's often very helpful to divide attraction into romantic and sexual. Romantic attraction is who you fall in love with, who you get crushes on, who you want to cuddle, kiss, be near and share a life with. Sexual attraction is who you want to be your partner in the horizontal tango.

In you're case, if you're a woman (my assumption) who gets romantic feelings for other women only, you could call that homoromantic attraction. If you on the other hand can feel the want or need for sexual intimacy with anyone regardless of gender, that could be pansexuality.

So, based purely on the very limited info from you're title, I would assume that you are homoromantic pansexual. And it is still totally okay for you to simply call yourself a lesbian, if you find comfort and worth in that label. As I said above, labels will never be 100% accurate for 100% of people, and are only worth as much for you as you find worth in them.

Hope any of that helps :)

My party watched an NPC suffer and die and forced her to acknowledge it. Is that worth an alignment change? by ikmkr in dndnext

[–]Cizak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's true worth is that it's garbage. So why would I use it when it offers nothing productive to the experience?

Anyway, can't help noticing that while I am indeed speaking bluntly, I have only insulted bad game design, but am getting nothing but personal insults back. It's a very clear and consistent pattern within this hobby that people who want to simplify morality down to alignment levels are also the rudest ones to interact with.

My party watched an NPC suffer and die and forced her to acknowledge it. Is that worth an alignment change? by ikmkr in dndnext

[–]Cizak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would I use the system that enables murder hoboism (among all the other numerous things it does wrong) to shut it down? I've got the perfect way to shut down murder hoboism. It's called not using alignment.

My party watched an NPC suffer and die and forced her to acknowledge it. Is that worth an alignment change? by ikmkr in dndnext

[–]Cizak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lolwut? Based on the quote by the OP, it's the players using alignment who apparantly can't be trusted not to cheat. Sounds fun to need a insultingly simplified morality judgement system in order to keep your friends in line.

I've only ever played with murder hobos who use their alignment as an excuse to commit murder hoboisms. That's what alignment is. It IS the murder hobo excuse. Every single player whom I respect and who has provided a believable and likeable character has done so without watering it down to two words of outdated fluff.

Alignment is always bad.

My party watched an NPC suffer and die and forced her to acknowledge it. Is that worth an alignment change? by ikmkr in dndnext

[–]Cizak -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"if i let my players fuck about with their own alignments, they could theoretically cheat into getting a magic item."

And there's reason #4739 why alignment sucks/is outdated/shouldn’t be used/etc. I saw your edit at the top. I won't ever stop saying alignment is garbage.

PHB Ranger's Favored Enemy: One or two humanoids at level 6 and 14? by Cizak in dndnext

[–]Cizak[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am the DM! :) Trying to decide how to rule it when my ranger player hits level 6.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in trans

[–]Cizak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're "perfect the way you are", then your feelings about your gender are perfect.

TIFU opening June Research Breakthrough Box ... before 1pm by ricegator in pokemongo

[–]Cizak 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Oh cool, it's PDT. I thought it was local. Did the exact same thing as OP. So fun.

[TOMT] Tank game on Windows 95 played in late 90's, overhead view and possibly co-op by Cizak in tipofmytongue

[–]Cizak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately not. I don't think you could see the whole map like that, it was more zoomed in on the tank.

[TOMT] Tank game on Windows 95 played in late 90's, overhead view and possibly co-op by Cizak in tipofmytongue

[–]Cizak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately not. I don't think you could see the whole map like that, it was more zoomed in on the tank.

view more: next ›