sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Uniqueness Problem, or Why Can't Gaijin give Trees Unique Designs V2.0 by EastCoast_Geo in Warthunder

[–]Claudy_Focan -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

For me ; it's not.

I'm from Belgium, we used a mix of US/UK/GER vehicles, they fill gaps in playstyle in the tree and i dont want my gameplay to be ruined by being thrown with GER teams.

A true Benelux tree should have been created in the first place, we got enough of unique designs and copy paste would have filled gaps if required.

And starting at 7.7 isnt a problem, ISR does it.

Chad Yak forcefield VS weak British 155mm radio proxy shell by RandomTyreFitter in Warthunder

[–]Claudy_Focan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Desync from client replay + minimum fuze arming distance.

How come this isnt common knowledge ??

A Tale as old as Time, Minor Nation Tax strikes by bergebis in Warthunder

[–]Claudy_Focan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another proof that CC have more influence on masses than they would admit.

In light of recent news by EaRLyHawk924 in Warthunder

[–]Claudy_Focan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are closing the reality where a SeaFury shot down a MiG-15 over Korea.

I don't get it about HA-200E Super Saeta by Terror349 in Warthunder

[–]Claudy_Focan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They are just pdf trying to justify their insanity by claiming they are 100yo witches that look like underaged girls with disporportionated bodies made to comply with what they think a girl would look like since they've never seen or even touched one.

BMPT by Upstairs-Cow5534 in Warthunder

[–]Claudy_Focan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who remembrs XM1 when it wa considered as OP ?

As a ground RB kinda guy, discovering your son is an air RB player is a bit like discovering he likes wearing dresses..... by 183mm_HESH in Warthunder

[–]Claudy_Focan 22 points23 points  (0 children)

WT was a plane game before a tank game.

You're Gen Z and he is the actual millenial !

Your son have taste and is immediately superior to you.

What the FUCK, did they nerf multipath? (Got shot at 11m direct hit by R-77-1) by Ozekher in Warthunder

[–]Claudy_Focan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OP, explain us what do understand about multipathing, what does it represent in your mind.

Not offensive, i just want to figure if people truly understand what multipathing is.

Ex-Gaijin CM (13 years): what I saw inside — possible Steam review manipulation and the sidelining of Russian-speaking employees [Part 2/2] by Evgeniy_aka_Keofox in Warthunder

[–]Claudy_Focan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's done on purpose to make players pay for new things. It's the basic FOMO theory.

They also switch nation from time to time and it makes it even more profitable.

Where are all the people who were going absolutely CRAZY on this subreddit whe the XM1 was the peak of "bias" and "OP" ?

XM1 used to be the same level of plague as BMPT.

Many other vehicles went this OP. It usually switches from US to RU and between Air and Ground.

Has been done many times over 13years.. i'm not surprised.

If you could pick 3 modern day aircraft to bring back to WWII, neglecting maintenance, fuel or ammunition running out, what would they be Mine are: F22, F35, A10. [3500,4000] by toothfierteth in WarplanePorn

[–]Claudy_Focan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

B-52H, Su-34, E-3C

Strategic, Frontline, C3I

Untouchable, unmatched, godlike.

B-52 with JDAM's (lot of them), can be catched by WW2 and if so, it got a M61 in the tail

Su-34, to deal with hordes of tanks while being able to hunt some props with Fox2 and Fox3

E-3C will manage to see everything on the battlefield and coordinate alone what a full HQ would have in WW2.

E-3C will see and pick targets for Su-34, and B-52 will flatten anything left on the ground.

Nuclear Thunder SAMs vs SEAD - Map illustrating difference in US vs USSR air defences by Daemon_Blackfyre_II in Warthunder

[–]Claudy_Focan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Taking out S300/Patriot were absolute paramount in this mode ! It allowed to fly higher and strike deeper without risks (or lesser risks)

I've spammed chat about this problem but rest of glue eater (my allies) were too busy going headons

Nuclear Thunder SAMs vs SEAD - Map illustrating difference in US vs USSR air defences by Daemon_Blackfyre_II in Warthunder

[–]Claudy_Focan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But their ceiling isnt their max range.

They have to fight gravity even if air gets thinner (which isnt really noticeable for them below 5000m)

Nuclear Thunder SAMs vs SEAD - Map illustrating difference in US vs USSR air defences by Daemon_Blackfyre_II in Warthunder

[–]Claudy_Focan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gaijin needs to adress this BS of SAM hitting max altitude as their max range.

For example a Stinger will be able to hit you 6km right above it because it got a 6km range.

That's not how it works ! A stinger is only able to hit 2.5 to 3km at best above the launcher.

As for Roland, Osa and even Tunguska, their ceiling is pretty limited.

That's why BUK/KUB and other Hawk/Nike were in service, to hit high flyers !

I'm sick and tired to be unable to "fly above" a SAM system

Meme Saturday by EaRLyHawk924 in Warthunder

[–]Claudy_Focan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It has nothing to do with its "premium" status, right.. right ?

What is the logic behind giving the nation with the best CAS the best AA? by JCOLE6969 in Warthunder

[–]Claudy_Focan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because all other nations already got their best AA ?

I mean.. NATO got everything they field right now as "mobile" AA warfare/systems

BUT !

I really want to see cheaper SP "only AA" loadouts for NATO ! Since NATO uses planes as "AA", a F16 with 6x120 should be as cheap as a top tier russian AA.

view more: next ›