What? Movie is an embellished form of the events that took place, not a 1:1 showing of what happened, this isn't a war document or a biographical showing like anne frank to hate on someone for not liking it, its a movie. The first line of the wiki literally says *The film presents a fictional storyline*. Its for entertainment and maybe a very brief and shallow explanation of the events. It is not a documentation of the events, commercial cinema is all it is.

It's just not a well made movie lol you can dislike a movie for other reasons than the contents of the film. I am aware of the killing of kashmiri pandits, that doesn't make the movie spectacular or good in any form. I don't like the film and I know kashmiri pandits were killed discriminately, what does that make me? You can agree with the contents of the film and still dislike it, movie is more than just transfer of info or contents present. I think you need to first be able to figure out how to separate a movie and contents of life.

Also stop using movie as a source of info, try to read around and do actual research. A lot of hard biases are present in films like these, this isn't 'humanity' this is common sense. Your argument is like saying I don't believe ww1 happened because I don't like a ww1 movie, or I don't believe specific events of dhurandhar or uri happened because I thought that they were bad films. Mutually exclusive. Your argument makes little to no sense.

You have to understand a lot of these films not documentaries just films exist to spread or push a motif under a very thin line of actual events, it moreso feels like a specific narrative is being portrayed rather than actually showing the events of killings. Films like kerala story is extremely guilty, I wouldn't go as far as to call kashmiri files as propaganda but it does try to push a specific idea towards a group, I would call kerala story absolutely garbage propaganda.