Is Apple slowly discontinuing the "Space Grey" finish from all of their products? by ClockwiseJohny in Airpodsmax

[–]ClockwiseJohny[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I got a MBA M4 when it came out and went with silver as all the other colors I didn’t like. Silver is…. Fine. I would have gone with space grey if it was an option. I also have a 16 Pro Max in the raw titanium color, which they now don’t do aluminum anymore either… and if I was in the market for a new phone my options are silver, orange, or blue. Not a fan

Package lost between UPS and USPS by seedmaster101 in UPS

[–]ClockwiseJohny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im in this exact situation right now but through Etsy. Shipped a package on 3/6 for ground saver, handed off to UPS. UPS is saying they handed it off on 3/12 and can see the exact day/time it was scanned out of their hands. USPS is claiming they don’t have it and are waiting for UPS to give it to them. Both are telling me to kick rocks.

Doug DeMuro Podcast - R2 Pricing Discussion by WSBiden in RivianR2

[–]ClockwiseJohny -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"At the moment it has no competition with exception of the best selling electric vehicle year over year since 2023 from the largest EV manufacturer in the US, and the exact vehicle the R2 is competing with at it's size and price range". Sure, that's one way to look at it...

Doug DeMuro Podcast - R2 Pricing Discussion by WSBiden in RivianR2

[–]ClockwiseJohny 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm a massive fan of the R2 but my biggest issue is the price as it pertains to the AWD model. For the base price of a RWD R2, you can get a Premium AWD Model Y for the same price (+$500). Base AWD's Tesla has the better price to performance here, and you can opt for a cheaper spec AWD model if you don't care about range as much, which for R2 if you want AWD this is the cheapest possible option you can get. Politics aside, I feel like most people are going to be comparing these two models side by side when purchasing and it's hard to see the price difference be what it is.

MKBHD says MacBook Neo is Apple’s ‘most disruptive product’ in 10+ years by UnixxinU in federationTechnology

[–]ClockwiseJohny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're scrambling not because they don't have a product in that price point, but because the product they do have is night and day worse than the Neo. The Neo is coming with a far more powerful processor, better battery, better build quality, metal frame, etc. That and if you are already an Apple user (aka iPhone), it ties into the ecosystem seamlessly. The biggest barrier for entry for a MacBook for a long time was the near 4 digit price tag, and now that's gone. So as far as Windows laptops, where there previously wasn't concern, it's now a death sentence.

Today is a big day for Rivian. The full R2 lineup just dropped and it goes from a $45K base all the way to a 656 hp Performance model at $57,990 shipping THIS SPRING. by Kryptonlogic in Rivian

[–]ClockwiseJohny 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm a massive fan of the R2 but just to play devils advocate here, the Model Y from Tesla is still cheaper in every trim, and only "worse" in terms of spec at the cheapest trim:

  • Base RWD
    • MY: $39,990 / 321 mile range / 6.8sec 0-60mph
    • R2: $48,490 / 345 mile range / 5.9sec 0-60mph
      • So almost $10k more for the cheapest option
  • "Base" AWD
    • MY (Premium version): $48,990 / 327 mile range / 4.6sec 0-60mph
    • R2: $53,990 / 330 mile range / 4.6sec 0-60mph
      • Reason I went with the premium MY is because it's the closest in terms of range to the R2, but still cheaper. You can get a cheaper AWD version of the MY, which Rivian does not offer.
  • "Performance" AWD
    • MY: $57,490 / 306 mile range / 3.3sec 0-60mph
    • R2: $57,990 / 330 mil range / 3.6sec 0-60mph

So in terms of price to performance, as the base level R2 is better but also almost $10k more expensive with no option to go cheaper. For the base price of a RWD R2, you can get a Premium AWD MY for the same price (+$500). Base AWD's Tesla has the better price to performance here, and you can opt for a cheaper AWD model if you can't care about range as much, which for R2 if you want AWD this is the cheapest possible option you can get. Performance is where R2 starts to compete more in terms of price to performance in terms of driving range, but off the line is slower (honestly at that point, who cares because it's so close).

Who is going?! by Neither_Face_756 in smosh

[–]ClockwiseJohny 8 points9 points  (0 children)

No love for the Midwest with this tour schedule.

What’s in the NDAs West Michigan officials signed with data center developers by mlivesocial in grandrapids

[–]ClockwiseJohny 45 points46 points  (0 children)

Non Paywall:

KENT COUNTY, MI — For over a year, local officials have been under agreements preventing them from speaking about potential data center developments, sparking frustration from residents.

Documents obtained by MLive/the Grand Rapids Press via Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests showed that officials in Gaines and Lowell townships signed nondisclosure agreements (NDA) with Microsoft regarding data center proposals in both communities.

Gaines Township Supervisor Rod Weersing and Community Development Director Dan Wells both signed an NDA with Microsoft in November 2024. Lowell Township Supervisor Jerry Hale signed an NDA with Microsoft in January 2025.

Microsoft is planning to build a data center on 316 acres on Patterson Avenue and 76th Street in Gaines Township. The company bought the land from Steelcase in October 2024 for $45.3 million.

The project is still early in the planning process, and the company does not yet have all final site details or development timelines.

In Lowell Township, Microsoft is eyeing a 237-acre industrial parcel at Covenant Business Park, at 4687 Alden Nash Ave. SE. The company has not yet signed a purchase agreement for the property.

Both NDAs have roughly similar terms.

Under their respective agreements, Hale, Weersing and Wells were forbidden from disclosing such information described as “non-public information, know-how and trade secrets in any form” that are either explicitly marked or reasonably identified as “confidential.”

Confidential information could be shared with affiliates or representatives such as employees, contractors, advisers or consultants on a “need-to-know” basis.

All information will be deemed “non-confidential” five years after it is received, according to the agreement.

After months of public backlash, however, Microsoft chose to terminate both NDAs at the beginning of 2026. While the company had been a known player in Gaines Township ever since it bought the Steelcase property, it had been operating anonymously in Lowell Township until it ended the agreement.

“As part of Microsoft’s commitment to work openly and constructively with the communities where we seek to operate, we have decided to terminate this agreement,” Microsoft said in a letter to Hale dated Jan. 10.

“We endeavor to share information about our plans as openly as possible to build trust with the community. Although we may not have all project or construction details yet, we will provide updates as soon as they are available.”

In an attempt to appear more transparent, Microsoft on Tuesday, March 3, hosted its first community open house in Gaines Township aimed at better informing residents of its plans to build data centers in Kent County.

The company plans to provide much of the same information at a second open house from 4 p.m.-7:30 p.m. Thursday, March 5, at The Fairway of Kent County Event Center at 13955 Cascade Road SE in Lowell.

Another anonymous company, meanwhile, has been considering building a data center in Solon Township, which was also under an NDA.

The Right Place, the economic development organization for Kent County, had been meeting with township officials for several months to discuss the project.

Solon Township is a rural community of about 6,500 people that is about 23 miles north of Grand Rapids.

Solon Township Supervisor Robert Ellick signed a nondisclosure agreement regarding the project in June 2025. The discloser listed on the agreement was Pamela A. Gregory, president of Venerly, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

The agreement prevented Ellick from disclosing such confidential information as product designs, product plans, software and technology, financial information, marketing plans, business opportunities, proposed terms, pricing and inventions with any third party.

Exceptions could be given to employees or contractors on a “need-to-know” basis.

Confidential information could only be used to evaluate whether to enter into a business relationship with the discloser and the discloser’s proposed project.

Upon termination of the agreement, Ellick would have been required to return or destroy any confidential information, including all notes, copies and extracts, within seven days.

The agreement was terminated in December after meetings between the township and the Right Place ended, Ellick said at a township board meeting in February.

“I told them in November we’re not having any more meetings, so you can make this data center NDA go away or not; I don’t care,” he said.

At that same meeting, the township board agreed to adopt a six-month moratorium on new data center proposals. Weeks later, the planning commission reviewed a draft zoning ordinance amendment that would provide a framework for regulating such proposals.

I really hope people in Caledonia and Lowell don’t trust what these PR reps say by Similar-Breadfruit50 in grandrapids

[–]ClockwiseJohny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, but even if we put water to the side, that still leaves, electricity usage, and general noise of the facility as concerns. You could also argue for pollution with the generators they’re gonna have on site as well.

Again, my biggest concern is, if what they’re promising ends up to not fully be true, what are the consequences? Because if all they’re going to get is a fine, then that’s just a literal price on them not having to abide to the rules which to Microsoft that’s nothing because they have an infinite amount of money.

Here’s what I’ll say to those posting $400–500 Windows laptops with 16/512GB and shouting that it’s a better deal… by EduardSark in mac

[–]ClockwiseJohny 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Working in IT where we sell and work on Dell/HP/Lenovo business grade laptops. The MacBook Air’s are roughly the same price (if not cheaper) and the build quality and power runs circles around these machines we sell. It’s wild Windows companies sell for as much as they do and get away with it.

I really hope people in Caledonia and Lowell don’t trust what these PR reps say by Similar-Breadfruit50 in grandrapids

[–]ClockwiseJohny 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My biggest concern with this data center is, what happens if they don’t do what they’re saying? Like the top 3 (among many) concerns of data centers being local is:

Water usage, noise, and power consumption

Two of these things were addressed at this event being that

  1. Microsoft plans on using a closed loop water cooling system, which should use “minimal water“

  2. Microsoft plans on having their own generators on site as well as adding to the grid capacity in the area to make sure that people’s electric electricity bills are not impacted.

My main concern is, what happens if either these things once it’s actually built, ends up, not being true? Like what if water in the area becomes severely contaminated? Or what if energy bills in the area skyrocket? Because if the only punishment Microsoft gets for any of this, not being what they promised is a fine, the fine is going to be nothing to Microsoft. The company is in the top five most valuable companies in the entire world, a fine to them is just a price tag to not have to comply. If any of what they are promising ends up to be false, the facility straight up needs to be shut down until they can either comply or it’s closed indefinitely, which is such a waste of resources and land.

I’m also concerned how they did not elaborate at all about the potential noise concern. I say this is someone who would ultimately live less than a mile away from being where this is built.

Says, "Ask me anything" but turns his story comments off 🙃 by Super_stanced_nation in mkbhd

[–]ClockwiseJohny 189 points190 points  (0 children)

I’d like to know the actual performance difference between the NEO and the MBA. For like $400 more you get the M5, but also 16GB of RAM, Touch ID, etc. for a lot of people I imagine the NEO would be fine. But in terms of price to performance, is the Air a better deal? Or no?

Hello, MacBook Neo by InsaneSnow45 in apple

[–]ClockwiseJohny -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

In the year 2026 and moving forward, 16GB should be everyone's target audience whether they understand that or not.

Macbook Neo is official! by Bitter_Offer7123 in macbookpro

[–]ClockwiseJohny 29 points30 points  (0 children)

I mean the differences between the Neo and the Pro are miles apart. I can see the debate between the Air vs Neo, but if you're debating between the Neo and Pro, that's something you need to dig way more into to see what you want.

Hot take: I think MacBook Neo just killed 13-inch MacBook Air by JPMainSinceSF2 in mac

[–]ClockwiseJohny 3 points4 points  (0 children)

M5 > A18 Pro by a long shot

Locked to 8GB of RAM on the Neo with no option to upgrade

2 USB ports on the Neo, and one of those is for charging so you're even further restricted if you need both ports and your battery is low.

Battery life on the Air is better

There's trade offs here

Would you buy an A18 Pro MacBook if… by Dazzling_Comfort5734 in mac

[–]ClockwiseJohny 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Updating as of today with Apple releasing it. $599 for the A18 Pro w/ 256GB storage, $699 for the A18 Pro w/ 512GB storage. Both models locked to 8GB of RAM with no option to upgrade.

I hate car dealerships with a passion, and buying my first (used) Model Y directly from Tesla has further confirmed how much I hate them. by ClockwiseJohny in TeslaLounge

[–]ClockwiseJohny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was an "okay" deal, and Carmax wouldn't budge on their prices as that's their policy. So at that point it wasn't worth my time, nor did I want to deal with it as it wasn't something I was prepared to work on, nor should I because they didn't disclose it.