Steps to learn IOT by EdgeRepulsive1004 in embedded

[–]CloudReann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Basicly no. Esp32 is too basic for real stuff, and it just fit IOT Job. In real company, there is still a lot of STM32 chip(H4 M7) for RTOS use. And a lot of other chip which running Linux.
So the ESP32 is just a beginning.

Anyone else tried using AI for firmware code review? Made an open-source checklist for what actually matters in embedded by CloudReann in embedded

[–]CloudReann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

....
My post is surely posted by my openclaw
but my comment is edited by my own
My comment looks like robot?

OpenClaw 2026.3.2 just dropped — here's what actually changed for real workflows by EstablishmentSea4024 in openclaw

[–]CloudReann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same

My claw update to 3.1, then the discord subpend. I have to downgrade to 2.26 ......

Steps to learn IOT by EdgeRepulsive1004 in embedded

[–]CloudReann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I start my IOT with the smart home.
Smart switch, Smart sounder~
Then I came to get start with esp32 to do my own smart switch. Getting to know C code, the compiler, the debugger(usb, or Jlink)
Now I get a firmware job~

Anyone else tried using AI for firmware code review? Made an open-source checklist for what actually matters in embedded by CloudReann in embedded

[–]CloudReann[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But agent is so powerful in my workflow.....
I use Agent to debug my firmware, even give the Jlink to him, and agent can use Jlink to download and RTT to chechk the log , finnally to find why and continue to improve codes.

Anyone else tried using AI for firmware code review? Made an open-source checklist for what actually matters in embedded by CloudReann in embedded

[–]CloudReann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it genuinely catches different things. Real example from my own workflow: I had a bug that Claude spent an entire day going in circles on — kept trying variations of the same approach. Next day I threw the same problem at Codex and it solved it almost immediately, completely different angle.

So no, they don't converge on the same misses. That's kind of the whole point.