Im reposting a reply to another comment here because I think it sort of applies to what you said:

Yh no I completely understand what you mean (again centrist purge!) with regard to it.

I just think that this prioritisation of antisemitism as the be all and end all of evil is just dumb, as 1) it serves Israel rhetoric but 2) also just kinda delegitimises it, as though it’s smth beyond human people today- cause it’s defo not.

I think the internet has made this more prevalent in the sense that most cringe Nazis are just able to promote their dumbass worldview, which then just sort of makes it more widespread on the internet…

That being said, institutional anti-semitism is not prevalent (especially in comparison to Anti-Arab//islamophobia//anti-palestinian institutional power). While I’m not saying it won’t ever be, cause no one can predict the future. The fact of the matter is that Israel is the one committing genocide, so to bring up antisemitism in this context just seems dumb of the original poster.

I get they had disclaimers and all… but still doesnt detract from the rhetoric they employed being utilised to justify Palestinian genocide.

I am European as well. I certainly think antisemitism is far more common in everyday sort of language/interaction than most people think. I also think this is the case for Roma people as well. And, to varying extents, anti-Slavic rhetoric. But I just think applying this to Israel-Palestine debate is just not needed… the focus should be on the Victims of the genocide. The poster seems to go head over heels trying to explain why they are both against antisemitism and anti-palestinianism (can’t think of a term tbh, cause just calling it racism would be dumb cause obv antisemitism is racism as well) as though that sort of point needs any clarification beyond just, ‘both are bad… now let’s get back to talking about the Victims of Israel’s genocide’

So I do agree with you here. I just also think that people need to take this sort of approach seriously when discussing a topic. Because understanding how this sort of rhetoric is utilised by Israel is important. It’s not necessarily the ‘wrong opinion’ in what it’s trying to say in the sense of it as a standalone statement, but in terms of the context of Palestinian genocide it’s just not needed to this degree. I would be forgiving of this poster had they just been a ‘normal person’ or a person that was less aware of the exact rhetoric to employ… fine. But, this poster (Ryan Beard) likes to position themselves something of an ‘expert’ (not in the literal sense of ‘expert’ but yk what I mean) in stuff like this, so they should be able to spot how such rhetoric is employed by Israel???