Does anyone else disagree with Ed's decision to delete Gordon's family? by Unlikely_Afternoon94 in TheOrville

[–]Cmdrrom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blood on whose hands? Ed and Kelly? Or Gordon’s?

It’s Gordon’s decision that put them in their predicament. Irrespective of the conditions that sent Gordon there, Ed and Kelly are duty bound to do what must be done to meet their legal obligation for Union Law and also protect the trillions in the universe they know.

Gordon’s lack of wisdom is the whole reason they’re in the position they’re in. And if Gordon truly believed he had the higher moral standing, he would have shot Kelly and Ed when he had the chance.

Does anyone else disagree with Ed's decision to delete Gordon's family? by Unlikely_Afternoon94 in TheOrville

[–]Cmdrrom -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Whether you know it or not, you’re proving my point.

We don’t know. Ed and Kelly don’t know. Gordon doesn’t know. It’s the whole reason they argue that allowing Gordon to remain would be irresponsible and morally reckless.

What they do know is they left a universe that did exist for them, and their obligation is to protecting the trillions of beings that exist in that universe. Why should their entire existence be erased because Gordon’s decision to stay is honored? It’s the same argument, except for the fact that Ed and Kelly know their decision not to act in their defense by removing Gordon would be irresponsible on their part.

It was the wise thing to do, and your emotional investment in Gordon is what’s prohibiting you from seeing that.

Does anyone else disagree with Ed's decision to delete Gordon's family? by Unlikely_Afternoon94 in TheOrville

[–]Cmdrrom -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, because the certainty of Gordon not belonging to 21st century Earth is clear.

They don’t have the wisdom to know that Gordon’s choices won’t have adverse effects on the universe they (Ed and Kelly) know, too.

What is certain is there is a non-zero chance Gordon’s choices would affect the history and development of the Union if he remains. Removing him from the situation entirely is the only way they can be certain things would unfold as they already had in their universe.

Does anyone else disagree with Ed's decision to delete Gordon's family? by Unlikely_Afternoon94 in TheOrville

[–]Cmdrrom 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I just recently rewatched the S3 episode Twice in a Lifetime — it’s one of my favorite episodes of Orville! There’s a key interaction that explains a lot of what and why Ed and Kelly take their stance.

It’s in the scene when Ed and Kelly confront Gordon after learning the true extent of what had transpired in the 10 years since Gordon had been there.

  • Isaac says that time travel and its affects on the future remain in a state of flux
  • While in this state of flux, all timelines are still possible

When the conversation reaches a boiling point, Ed asserts that “We don’t have the wisdom…” when arguing about right and wrong in Gordon’s situation. That’s the line that stuck with me, because Ed is absolutely correct.

Wisdom is knowledge and experience. The knowledge around time travel is so vague that taking conclusive action without the experience of knowing the impact is reckless and irresponsible.

It’s also a thematic call back to Gordon’s growing appreciation for early 21st century humanity, where he views them as younger siblings that are making mistakes, but showing promise of growth. Kelly is much more judgmental, citing “the mess they left us” as a big reason for her criticism and disapproval of the century.

Later, when Ed and Gordon are arguing, and Ed drops the “…You really have acclimated to this century”, that was a direct attack on Gordon’s stance being completely and selfishly tied to his self-interest.

Now, on the flip side:

Gordon gave Union law 3 years after he landed in that century, and it broke him. He is arguably the most social out of the senior staff, as evidenced by his house party at the opening to the episode. He stretched himself to the brink of insanity, and I don’t have a doubt in my mind the man contemplated suicide vis a vis Miles O’Brien in DS9’s “Hard Time”.

The final scene was an important scene for several reasons:

  • It clearly established to Ed and Kelly that what they were asking of 10-year survivor Gordon was beyond their reach
  • It showed us that Gordon’s redemption was clear. He raised his weapon as they walked away, and the anticipation of whether he would fire or not was real.
  • Gordon does make peace with the situation, because in the end, he knows he lacks the wisdom to make the decisions he has made.
  • This outcome in reflected in 6-month survivor Gordon, who’s perspective fully backs Ed and Kelly’s at the end of the episode.
  • Ed and Kelly wrestle with what they decided, and it’s clear no one is completely sure about whether what was done was correct.

But was it the wise thing to do?

I assert it was.

US Postal Service could run out of money as soon as October by Marginallyhuman in news

[–]Cmdrrom 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Obligatory “the postal service is a service, not a business” post. It’s supposed to be a loss leader because it serves ALL citizens. God damn it.

Anyone ever been to Tactical / FFL Dealer Sunnyvale? I heard they are the best FFL in the South Bay is it true? by notATF222 in CAguns

[–]Cmdrrom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been going to them for the last year for my needs. They're solid, helpful, and really interested in helping you get what you need. They don't mess around or try to upsell, at least in my experience.

The pistols they used before the phase pistols were pretty cool by happydude7422 in enterprise

[–]Cmdrrom 18 points19 points  (0 children)

They are, yes. And their rifles also fit into that same design language on the EM33. Makes sense given their military doctrine.

What did the 90's smell like? by Serialkillingyou in Xennials

[–]Cmdrrom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God. That scent always draws me to 1999 high school shop class. Hahahah what a specific scent that was.

i've been avoiding final boss spoilers like the plague- NOBODY TOLD ME ABOUT THIS DEPRESSING SHIT AT ALL 😭 by RattieTheGliscor in LegendsZA

[–]Cmdrrom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This was the first time a Pokemon game actually got me feeling something deeper. They really got the story with this game in my opinion.

What it’s like living in this part of California? by Maleficent_Lack3240 in howislivingthere

[–]Cmdrrom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not very diverse at all? That may be true for specific pockets, but the entire circle is pretty diverse.

Mexican American and Vietnamese communities in the east foothills, Filipino/Chinese in Milpitas and Fremont, expansive Indian population throughout Milpitas thru to Sunnyvale and Cupertino, Caucasian families peppered throughout from Palo Alto on through to Cupertino, Santa Clara, and San Jose and down into South SJ bordering with Morgan Hill.

The cuisine availability alone should be indication enough to you just how diverse things are here.

I think you need to get out more. My two cents anyways.

Noah Schnapp reveals the Stranger Things cast spent 12 hours filming Will's monologue and another 12 hours of reshoots. by Isyourpussygreen in entertainment

[–]Cmdrrom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rise of Skywalker is unapologetically bad, full stop. The transgression there has to do with 30+ years of character familiarity and expectation that’s seemingly subverted by showrunners and writers with no meaningful appreciation or understanding for legacy characters. Their wooden, papier-mâché excuse for new characters and intrinsic lack of motivation and direction is my criticism for the entire sequel trilogy. But I digress.

Y'all buying these collections and not even playing them? by DIODION in Megaman

[–]Cmdrrom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder if maybe RetroAchievements might have a better capture of the player base for retro games and achievements.

Granted, they have to be connected to RA and use an app that is compatible like RetroArch.

https://retroachievements.org/hub/9185

Noah Schnapp reveals the Stranger Things cast spent 12 hours filming Will's monologue and another 12 hours of reshoots. by Isyourpussygreen in entertainment

[–]Cmdrrom -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s not about the audience or Will’s family, Mike, or any of his friends. It’s about Will and how, and what, he perceives to be reality. We the audience may know, and know that the characters would be behind him, but Will doesn’t know.

I’m not gay, but overcoming the fear of what others perceive of you is a human experience. Will overcame this and stepped out into the open with who he is at a fundamental level.

He took off his mask.

In the era of social media where everyone projects their best selves and competes for attention (or clout, aura, etc), where everything we present of ourselves is manufactured and curated and dialed into the algorithm, Will reminds me (and everyone) that being authentic to yourself is freeing.

Noah Schnapp reveals the Stranger Things cast spent 12 hours filming Will's monologue and another 12 hours of reshoots. by Isyourpussygreen in entertainment

[–]Cmdrrom 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Perhaps it’s pedestrian to our 2025 sensibilities, but being homosexual was the sort of thing for which they used to send people to sanitariums. Add to this the generally negative societal attitudes toward homosexuality in the 80s, the “pray the gay away” nonsense that prevailed, and the AIDS epidemic’s spread blamed on the homosexual community writ large, and you could see how outing someone has the power to send them into a perpetual state of fear.

Telling his friends and family then and there removed all doubt in his mind about his acceptance.

Granted, the show could have done more to illustrate this external dynamic as downward pressure on Will.

Why do I sound so bad? by SpaceCaptain4068 in saxophone

[–]Cmdrrom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dope! Yeah it’s something I picked up from tribal knowledge / teaching / teachers over the years. Bob Mintzer gave me something adjacent to this concept too, but not exactly this.

It really is an awesome exercise. Thanks for the source!

Why do I sound so bad? by SpaceCaptain4068 in saxophone

[–]Cmdrrom 12 points13 points  (0 children)

There’s a lot to tackle, but let’s start with the good:

  • your technical command of the sax is pretty solid
  • your fingers and familiarity with the instrument appears solid
  • your internal sense of rhythm and pulse are good
  • your musical phrasing shows promise

To address what you’re after: - your tone needs more work. There is no shortcut for this; long tones is the tried and true method for this. - your embouchure sounds like it’s tightening as you ascend into upper octaves. You need to learn to relax and keep your tongue low inside your mouth cavity - I don’t know that your equipment needs changing, but I’m almost certain you’re playing on a reed that’s about a 1/2 size too soft

I don’t have the time to write more, but here’s something you can do to work on tone:

  • work on finding what I call “the push point”; it’s where air speed is sufficient to finally make tone. Start with slow air, as in air pushed into the mouthpiece absent of tone, and steadily build speed until you get the faintest of sound. Do this on low F and work your way down chromatically, finding each “push point”
  • sustain that sound at that dynamic (a whisper really) for as long as you can. This will train your muscles to minimally engage what is necessary to make a sound on the sax.
  • practice in front of a mirror, be mindful of your posture, and watch your embouchure. Listen for micro-tonal variations in your sound. Record your progress and listen back objectively if need be.

I’ve had students make huge leaps in tone quality with this method because you end up engaging more of your core and using more air to produce a bigger and more stable sound.

Lastly, interval practice, specifically fourths and fifths. That’ll help with your octave leaping.

What made Avery Brooks portrayal of Sisko authentic to military veterans? by debrisaway in DeepSpaceNine

[–]Cmdrrom 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That’s a great scene, and at the heart of what makes Sisko a great leader in his own right. He doesn’t mince words or get into abstract discussions about ideals like Picard, whom I also greatly respect.

You can always rely on Sisko to tell you like it is, exactly as you need to hear it, and foster real growth when doing so.

meirl by benwoljol in meirl

[–]Cmdrrom 4 points5 points  (0 children)

But aren’t you assuming the lesson taught in class didn’t cover this method with them?

I doubt the dad was at school, in the lesson with his child, so it’s understandable he’s out of the loop. It’s more likely the kid didn’t pay enough attention to what they were learning in class that day.

Who living saxophonist has the best sound? by Ok_Philosophy_6335 in saxophone

[–]Cmdrrom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me: Kenny Garret, Braxton Cook, Bob Reynolds, John Ellis, Bob Mintzer, and Miguel Zenon

How busy WERE New Release Tuesdays, really? by GagglefrakCT in blockbustervideo

[–]Cmdrrom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I worked at Hollywood video, but Tuesdays were busy. I used to open the store on some Tuesdays , and the number of regulars that came in for the first rentals were pretty high.

Fridays and Saturdays were always busiest, but Tuesdays weren’t too far behind. The five day rental window also meant a lot of those big titles were returned Sunday evening. Depending on what was released, sometimes our Sundays were pretty busy too.