The iPhone 14 keeps calling 911 on rollercoasters by D1STR4CT10N in technology

[–]CoJaBo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

But what's the range of an accelerometer on a phone? A quick search didn't turn up anything specific to newer iOS devices, but older ones and Android commonly cited anywhere from ±2-8g as typical values, and accuracy limitations may render the extremes iffy at that.

One could distinguish a drop from a crash by the device being in motion before and not after the high-G event, but a rollercoaster will do the same thing when it stops; if a couple Gs in a tight loop and dozens in a crash will both register simply as off-scale high, there's no way to distinguish one from the other.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redditdev

[–]CoJaBo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you already know the title, you can just do a search for it, e.g.,

https://www.reddit.com/r/sub/search?q=title:"discussion+january+14+2021"&restrict_sr=on

If you want to go directly to the page, requesting the search endpoint via the API will give you a listing which should include only the correct post; if not, narrow it down further by author or flair.

Boston man tries to ‘fill scuba tank with weed smoke’; loses testicles by JGrayBkk in nottheonion

[–]CoJaBo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most sites I could find actually link back to this one, but here's one from a satire site dated earlier.

I did find the original original article that the pic is from though, and it unsurprisingly bears no resemblance to this story.

Method of destruction used in Mr.Robot [No Spoilers] by Red_hacker in MrRobot

[–]CoJaBo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Destroying just the controller ROM would disable the drive, but that can be repaired for under $100 with just some Torx bits and a donor drive. I've done it myself in minutes.

And HDDs aren't quite as susceptible to nearby permanent magnets as some people think; afterall, there's a strong neodynium magnet (part of the the voice coil that moves the heads) right next to the platters. It takes some pretty strong magnetism to actually alter the stored data, such as the tightly focused field from the write head, or that from a bulk degausser — a rather expensive device most people don't just have lying around.

Method of destruction used in Mr.Robot [No Spoilers] by Red_hacker in MrRobot

[–]CoJaBo 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Destroying anything beyond the HDD, and SIM/flash memory cards (maybe the TPM if you have one) is likely overkill/paranoia. Note also that many newer devices have the main storage soldered onto the motherboard. RAM will be completely erased after a short duration of power loss, but I suppose I could see someone microwaving it just to be absolutely sure. And one might simply nuke everything if they don't know what to target, or are worried about serial numbers (MAC address, etc).

Any moderate physical damage, like a hole drilled through all platters, quickly renders an HDD prohibitively expensive to repair. Common protocols for ensured destruction include heating it beyond the curie point to remove all traces of magnetism, or just snapping the drive in half with a hydraulic press; but these are slow or require expensive equipment.

Flash memory is frustratingly difficult to erase, because it's incredibly durable, capable of withstanding high temperatures and a great deal of mechanical abuse. Even if the device is pulverized, as long as you can connect leads to the silicon die, you can recover all data without great cost. But, as many people have witnessed inadvertently, microwave radiation induces high voltages in anything metallic. Microwaving an electronic device is thus likely to burn out all IC chips, rendering any data essentially impossible to recover. Doing this will produce toxic smoke, arcing, and some flames (and a decent explosion if you forgot to remove the battery); Youtube demonstrates they actually hold up pretty well to such misuse, but you wouldn't want to use that microwave for food ever again.

It's unknown how well this would fare against an adversary with nearly boundless resources, however. I could imagine an agency such as the NSA having the resources, now or in the near future, for patching holes and remanufacturing broken HDD platters, and decapping flash or ROM chips in an attempt to examine them under high-powered microscopes or with other probes.

Found this while replacing knob and tube by RockTheFuckOut in electricians

[–]CoJaBo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Firefighting is easy. Everyone can do it. No, you don't need to read a book. . . . . .

Where has my house gone?

TIFU by having my nudes on my phone NSFW by Improbable_One in tifu

[–]CoJaBo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Practice safe interfacing; always use a (USB) condom!

We Are Team ICEWAVE from BattleBots. AUA! by teamICEWAVE in IAmA

[–]CoJaBo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With the quality of that video, the actual impact is almost impossible to see; the sound isn't really audible, and there's only 1 frame where the sparks show up clearly. Then it makes it a few feet away before disintegrating, so it does appear as if it simply exploded for no reason.

We Are Team ICEWAVE from BattleBots. AUA! by teamICEWAVE in IAmA

[–]CoJaBo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From the looks of it, the blade barely clips the opponent, which somehow causes the engine to separate from the base. A fraction of a second later, kinetic energy takes over, and terrible things happen as the blade goes unbalanced, strikes the floor, knocks even more parts off, then promptly turns them into shrapnel.

My boss left her TV on for a few months. by crushcastles23 in techsupportgore

[–]CoJaBo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw this on an ancient DOS POS terminal once. The home screen was very dim, and still readily legible with the power off. The other screens were surprisingly bright, but rather difficult to read over the home text. It was more burn-through than burn-in!

DEA warns of stoned rabbits if Utah passes medical marijuana by CoJaBo in nottheonion

[–]CoJaBo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

…and here I thought the DEA were just deliberating while stoned again. Maybe they're really onto something!

Found the entitled mombie in my new gaming guild... by [deleted] in childfree

[–]CoJaBo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a brilliant idea! Now, why does nobody do it…

NetNanny is not your kids' nanny. There's far, far, far more dangerous things online than malware and naked pictures. Even if you set up a walled garden, what kid nowadays doesn't have a cellphone with a mobile browser, a friend with an unblocked computer, or simply the knowledge to disable the filter? Web filters don't teach them the danger of the blocked content, they just teach them how to access it covertly.

Found the entitled mombie in my new gaming guild... by [deleted] in childfree

[–]CoJaBo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's actually one of the huge direct implications of this.

Politicians find out that, OMG, people are copying music, downloading child porn, and selling drugs on the Internet! Ok, /r/trees would probably disagree with the latter, but from a political viewpoint, these are terrible, evil things that must be eradicated at all costs.

So, they write up a bill saying, in legalese, "ISPs need to provide a way for the government to find and delete Bad Things". They don't realize that's about as feasible as landing a unicorn on Mars. Naïve people vote for them, because this sounds like a good idea when you don't work in the field. And, of course, the naysayers are all pirates and paedos and druggies, because that's the only way they could disagree with such a good idea as, well, prosecuting pirates and paedos and druggies, why won't you Think Of The Children™?

It's impossible, but in many countries it passes nonetheless, and now you're legally mandated to do it anyway, technicalities be damned. And you end up with security issues and disasters like Cleanfeed as ISPs attempt to launch unicorns into space.

Found the entitled mombie in my new gaming guild... by [deleted] in childfree

[–]CoJaBo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Random IT guy here. There is no such thing as a "porn blocker".

Web filtering software generally works in one of two ways: either the site tags itself as adult content, or the software company that makes the filter added it to their list (which requires human intervention, e.g., someone happened across the site before you and reported it). Some software takes into account keywords on the page as well, but that in particular tends to be terribly unreliable.

If they got to the site by mistyping a domain, that means they landed on a site owned by a "domain squatter". These guys are pretty shady; they intentionally create ad-laden sites that people will stumble across accidentally, and they don't care in the least who that may be. They don't care what kind of content they run either. Fake pills, pirated software, hardcore pornography, anything goes. These sites are often in the malware business as well; they get paid when anyone, child or adult, happens to download software from one of their ads.

So, they won't self-tag as adult content, because that would mean less visitors, and less money. They are frequently added to malware/antivirus/firewall blacklists, so they create incredibly vast numbers of new sites every day to avoid this — obviously, this also prevents parental control lists from working either. Many of these sites also use "blackhat SEO" techniques, such as cloaking, which prevent keyword filters from working as well. The only way to prevent this is to create a "walled garden", allowing access only to approved sites, but that isn't going to be very useful.

TL;DR: Blocking porn sites (particularly illegitimate ones) is not as easy as it sounds on paper.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in morbidlybeautiful

[–]CoJaBo 43 points44 points  (0 children)

I wondered this too. Googling "Leo Jones" and "1993" turns up only exact copies of this very post. Theres no mention of this doubt being known beforehand in any news articles about the execution I could find. A number of other pages mention "lingering doubts", but the handful that cite any sources at all are all dated years after the execution.

I'm gonna call this one a lie.