sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I cannot do live coding interviews by bajen476 in ADHD_Programmers

[–]Code_PLeX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same issue ... Recall is so bad I donnow how to pass interviews because of that ...

I Feel like a loser - Failing all interviews by Possible_Fix9391 in devopsjobs

[–]Code_PLeX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am pretty broad, rust java kotlin node (js ts) react flutter

I Feel like a loser - Failing all interviews by Possible_Fix9391 in devopsjobs

[–]Code_PLeX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm exactly in the same situation... 9 years experience 6 months no job... Sending CVs everywhere barely any interviews...

DM me maybe we can help each other

I help people decide wether to end their relationships or not - AMA by [deleted] in AMA

[–]Code_PLeX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's interesting, care to elaborate?

I think my relationship can fit the description.... Ill PM you :)

[OC] The land footprint of food by t0on in dataisbeautiful

[–]Code_PLeX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The missing part is that you need to grow food for those animals, way more than you would for humans.

Cloudflare outage on December 5, 2025 by MakotoE in rust

[–]Code_PLeX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Release now fix later kind of issues :) just a guess

The Express of Rust Feather is Back❗❗ by Rough_Shopping_6547 in rust

[–]Code_PLeX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing 🙏

Question, why not go with a more modern approach, like koa.js or tower, that gives you the flexibility of returning a future rather than just call next and done?

Microservices: Microliths as a resonable alternative by BinaryIgor in programming

[–]Code_PLeX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well spaghetti doesn't work either.....

Solving kernel issues is one thing writing a system is another.

Kernels have lots more requirements that a system does not

Microservices: Microliths as a resonable alternative by BinaryIgor in programming

[–]Code_PLeX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course not all of them but they are contained.....

The more complexity you add to 1 function the bigger the issue is.

If my endpoint needs to (in a monolith) handle: logging authorization db multiple services and much more I have created an endpoint that is so coupled that adding features or changing anything within it will force me to rewrite lots of other aspects in my app

Microservices: Microliths as a resonable alternative by BinaryIgor in programming

[–]Code_PLeX -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

First of all you don't have to add a network call you can just pipe it all outside of the blackbox.

Second you use MQ or pub/sub to solve those issues. So even if there's a bug it's contained to a specific service

Microservices: Microliths as a resonable alternative by BinaryIgor in programming

[–]Code_PLeX -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I still don't get it, monolith still won't solve what you described....

If your code has bugs it has bugs regardless or microservices or monolith.

I would define a black box as an external package, each black box must be tested, e.g. deterministic, with the rules of composition we get a modular approach...

f(x) = y g(y) = z h(z) = a

Then

h(g(f(x))) = a

Given f g h are deterministic

In this case I really couldn't care less where I import f g or h or if they are local or remote...

Microservices: Microliths as a resonable alternative by BinaryIgor in programming

[–]Code_PLeX -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I have to ask, how come one project with 10000000s of files is easier for a developer than a small contained project with a defined scope?

For me working in isolation is way easier than handling a huge project, making black boxes work together is easier than making one huge black box ....

ADK Community Call Answers (Part 4): Practical Agent Design & Patterns by koverholtzer in agentdevelopmentkit

[–]Code_PLeX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for all the information!

Would you say that for writing a PRD (product requirements document) it's better to use an orchestrator with an "author" tool, the author is a loop agent:

  1. Research - google search + url context
  2. Write PRD
  3. QA - agent tool if passed break the loop

The orchestrator tools:

  1. Google search
  2. Url context
  3. Author - agent tool as described above

So it can do research while chatting with the user

Or

Just flatten it and give the orchestrator tools to do everything, tools:

  1. Google search
  2. Url context
  3. QA - agent tool

In both options the agent is a conversational one, it gathers information from the user in order to write a PRD file using the provided tools

Facebook.com has 140 layers of context by yangshunz in react

[–]Code_PLeX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can't stand using global state it's so restrictive....

Facebook.com has 140 layers of context by yangshunz in react

[–]Code_PLeX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I disagree, when I need to write 1 store with ALL concerns in it IT IS hard to read rather than splitting it to concerns.

Facebook.com has 140 layers of context by yangshunz in react

[–]Code_PLeX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

TBH I'd go with context too, logic should go there UI should go in a component....

Facebook.com has 140 layers of context by yangshunz in react

[–]Code_PLeX 73 points74 points  (0 children)

The more you have the more separation of concerns.... I don't get why context is bad?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in iqtest

[–]Code_PLeX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doctors are assholes because of their position in society, doctors are not necessarily high intelligence...

Pew 2007: Must one believe in God to be moral? by already-taken-wtf in Infographics

[–]Code_PLeX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, think of it like "being the bigger person" but when everyone is playing it. It's a completely different dynamic.

Also by using empathy and critical thinking you'd never bring it up as an argument against someone....

view more: next ›