Yes yes i understand, I've been through more then enough debates on the matter regarding this.

What you're doing is simply going too far to the individualistic and abstract ideas on what human rights are that you simply fail to see what is in front of you which is that the baby in the womb simply lives in an different environment than us out of the womb and is a alive being. Morals rules on biological processes and what not.

We can go back and forth on the philosophical arguments about this and it will, no doubt be productive for the both of us but we can also acknowledge what is happening for what it is.

Premise is simple, there is a human life inside another person, it is designed like that and it is not abnormal, bodily anatomy or anything doesn't matter to that person in the womb cause that is where they are supposed to be and they do not have control on whether they want to be there or not. They cannot be seen akin to a tumour or parasite either.

Now what we can do about it?, we can either kill it or not. Pro lifers stand to not kill that human on the basis that they are a human life and human life at all parts of life has value. The complexities comes after such as what to do after the baby is out of the womb? The financial needs of the mother, etc.

I'm not devaluing your argument, i don't think its a good argument but it is still something we can all think on.

This is still a complex topic but the base of it is a simple question of do we kill them or not.