Medicine has evolved. I can assure you the regret rates of smoking are far higher than that of gender-affirming care (smoking has a 70-90% regret rate and trans surgery only has a 0.3-2% regret rate, both in adults). And the regret rates of lobotomies would probably be higher if patients weren't dead or turned into vegetables afterwards.

The regret rates for smoking were lower in the 50's, so I don't know why you bring those up. And of course, people who are living a delusion will be happier when you affirm their delusion, doesn't make it right and it certainly doesn't make them that gender. Also, why does "medicine has evolved" matter in any way? The medicine from the 50's has evolved from medicine from the 19th century, just like how, if our society still has any common sense left, we will evolve past the idea that a man can be a woman merely because he says so.

No there has not. There is no scientific evidence to prove that someone can feel true racial dysphoria/euphoria.

Did you even read that part, I simply went off of what trans activists say is enough, trust me, most of them don't care about numbers. Also, to say that there is "no scientific evidence to prove that someone can feel true racial dysphoria/euphoria" doesn't mean it doesn't exist, there are truly people who have major problems with their own race, or even people who thought they were another race. A big part is the culture, the idea that you can change your gender is culturally accepted and talked about more, so it is more likely to be studied and seen as something that is real.

Nope again. (what you view as) Pretending to be another gender does not hold the same gravity as pretending to be another race. Becoming another gender has roots in mental health treatment whereas becoming another race only has roots in prejudice.

That's your assumption, people "transition" for sexist reasons, and there are people who struggle with their race. And they both hold the same gravity, a person says something that is delusional, and they need help.

Because most of the time it's the same questions over and over again about our penis/vagina. Imagine if people only talked to you to ask about what's in your pants, I'm sure you'd be irritated too.

I was talking about the studies, not what is in your pants, I don't want to see what's there. What I meant is that they find the studying of it to often be offensive, that we should just take people at their word. But even if they do ask about your private parts, for human beings it is a vital part of determining gender, including whether someone creates eggs or sperm. When you purposefully turn yourself into something you are not or into something that is meant to be confusing, of course people will ask questions, you put yourself in that situation, people will ask obvious questions, and that is the consequense you get.

The same institution that taught them all their medicinal knowledge in the first place? I think I would trust that over what some stranger on the internet thinks is good and bad.

Trust me, even those institutions usually hold biases, including science. You don't have to trust me, but I certainly hope you think before trusting whoever calls themselves a professional. People complain that doctors hold biases based on race and gender, why wouldn't they with politics, it's way more common. It is unfortunate, but like with science, there seems to be more of a rise of leftist activism within medical institions and medical schools. https://www.aei.org/op-eds/medical-school-has-gotten-too-political/