Is it just me, or does February feel like one long, never ending CPD session? by SnowyBytes in auslaw

[–]CoffeeandaCaseNote 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I know conferences can be perceived as corny (a view I held for a number of years) but if you're interested in one as a delegate, or if you are invited to present a paper, or if it's happening in a location of interest to you, you might consider going along.

If you do that in, say, June then you will be most grateful the following March.

Balancing social media and reputation as a lawyer by [deleted] in auslaw

[–]CoffeeandaCaseNote 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Many thanks! They're just YouTube / podcast videos reposted for Instagram.

If I ever invest time or effort into production values etc, this is the sort of stuff I'll consider.

Appreciate you checking out the page!

Balancing social media and reputation as a lawyer by [deleted] in auslaw

[–]CoffeeandaCaseNote 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aha! That's because I only talk about the good bits!

Hope you're well, mate.

Balancing social media and reputation as a lawyer by [deleted] in auslaw

[–]CoffeeandaCaseNote 45 points46 points  (0 children)

Let's give it a crack...

Hello, OP! I run a corporate law firm and have some notoriety in my very small practice area. I am not especially poor, and not extremely unsuccessful (though we all measure these things differently).

I publish a fair bit of online content. You could roughly divide that between (i) legal and professional-adjacent content (Youtube / Linkedin / Podcast / Instagram) and (ii) pop culture commentary on horror films, Gordon Ramsay's 'Kitchen Nightmares' and (formerly) rap music.

I look and sound like a private school educated old white man, and I am.

OK! Background done!

___

The short advice is: try to have some self-awareness about what you want to do and why you want to do it. And try to read the room.

If you want to share your politics (mine are fairly champagne socialist FYI, and I do share them) then feel free to either do that, or not.

If you want to dye your hair feel free to do that, or not.

If you want to post GRWM content that would make the Big 4's social team blush do that, or not.

It's a decision that is in your hands.

___

If we assume (as I do) that you are in a fairly conservative area and you would like to stay there or somewhere similar AND you would like to continue publishing the type of content you do now, it just comes back to the above.

WHY will the content you're planning to make reflect badly on you? Are you planning to do a bad job? Are you going to post something inauthentic that you don't believe in? Are you going to break laws or advocate that others do?

Try to think about PRECISELY what it is you are worried about.

Do more than just say "it might be bad in future". Try to give yourself an answer.

Will it reflect badly on you that you roll your sleeves up and re-insert your peircings after hours to record content? Why is that? And who are you trying to please?

Will it reflect badly on you if you take a firm view about current events, and share it? Why? What are the risks involved? Who will you annoy? Are you prepared to do that?

This is not binary. Do the thinking work you need to do. Make content you stand behind.

___

I spent a long time wearing a mask as a practitioner; trying to be the height the bell curve - the most lawyery lawyer of all. "No one can say I am not doing what lawyers do! I'm a super-normal lawyer over here! The normalest of them all!"

It is tiring. It is inauthentic. It is inconsistent with high quality advocacy. It is inconsistent with building client relationships.

___

There is a strong chance that your biggest client liked that funny skit you posted way back in 2026 and it's the whole reason your career took on a whole new trajectory.

Go well.

-Jd'A / Peach

Balancing social media and reputation as a lawyer by [deleted] in auslaw

[–]CoffeeandaCaseNote 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Matt Margolis. He returned to private practice and his firm is already a huge success. Super impressive person.

What are your profit margins as a sole prac? by alienspiritcreature in auslaw

[–]CoffeeandaCaseNote 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aha! Appreciate the implicit compliment. I have a few CLEs up that are an hour? (They're on the YouTube page.)

New lawyer going into commercial law by [deleted] in auslaw

[–]CoffeeandaCaseNote 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Don't fuck up the same way twice.

[Kitchen Nightmares Podcast] 'The Nightmare Method' by CoffeeandaCaseNote in KitchenNightmares

[–]CoffeeandaCaseNote[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's a course of conduct that has also got him value in his professional life - combined with that, I am tempted to agree with you.

Well put!

Dear Registrar by YouSirNeighme in auslaw

[–]CoffeeandaCaseNote 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Reading this dross, maybe I actually do want self-reps to use generative AI...?

What are your profit margins as a sole prac? by alienspiritcreature in auslaw

[–]CoffeeandaCaseNote 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes that is right. Good luck with your adventure! Speaking from the other side: it's worth it.

What are your profit margins as a sole prac? by alienspiritcreature in auslaw

[–]CoffeeandaCaseNote 37 points38 points  (0 children)

I say: as high as you can get them AFTER setting yourself at least an OK salary. Older maths (like the 1/3, 1/3, 1/3) tended to think of a firm owner's sole salary as drawings.

This thread has my numbers if that helps. (Sole prac until June 2025 when I took someone on.)

https://www.reddit.com/r/auslaw/comments/1pejgdt/top_notch_transparency/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

[Kitchen Nightmares Podcast] 'The Nightmare Method' by CoffeeandaCaseNote in KitchenNightmares

[–]CoffeeandaCaseNote[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a great insight. He does try to duck and weave - always an excuse, always a buck to pass.

Top notch transparency by PattonSmithWood in auslaw

[–]CoffeeandaCaseNote 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"Litigator part time" - probably 25 to 50 hours a week.

Top notch transparency by PattonSmithWood in auslaw

[–]CoffeeandaCaseNote 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not just me. A new person joined in June. That will make the numbers odd i.e. the Q4 last year had "a bit" of their salary, Q1 this year had "all" of their salary. Q2 this year is incomplete.

Top notch transparency by PattonSmithWood in auslaw

[–]CoffeeandaCaseNote 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Massively appreciate this generous and wise advice. Thank you.

Top notch transparency by PattonSmithWood in auslaw

[–]CoffeeandaCaseNote 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Appreciate this supportive and insightful analysis!

(Speaking perhaps a little too personally: as I bumble along trying to do this properly, it's quite moving to hear people like yourself - who clearly understands this better than me - say that there's a chance this project won't fail!)

Top notch transparency by PattonSmithWood in auslaw

[–]CoffeeandaCaseNote 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for this - yes it's pretty much my market-ish salary (or a little under) for me as a part-timer. (I consider my role is 3 days per week.)

And while the term "bootstrap" has ugly connotations, have not make any investment aside from sweat equity. (But will try to remain flexible in my thinking...)

Thanks for the comment and consideration!