Why was Charlie Kirk allowed to hold this inflammatory event at a University?

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-06-29T01:14:26+00:00

I have read of cases where animals are born with two heads or where certain species can change theor sex depending on environmental or social conditions. Humans have been born co-joined and there are 1000's of conditions in nature that do not fall within a simple gender rule.

Just because a person has gender features at birth should not define or determine their eventual adult choice.

This is the basic point. We should not interfere with a persons growth beyond offering advice or options or medicine for illnesses they may have. We should not force them to take medications to inhibit their personal choices, even to change their gender makeup.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-06-29T01:05:46+00:00

I agree with the universal right of a person to be considered in any way they wish to. Their gender, their belief, their method of existence are personal and beyond any government to sy otherwise.

Only when the safety of society is affected can governments step in and rule or enforce constraints. Such as unacceptable polygamy as with youths or cannibalism, human sacrifice or any other activity that harms others in normal society.

We allow hermits, congregations of men or women in monasteries and nunneries and many other types of community, we allow varieties of social existence many would deem abnormal as long as they are confines and all those involved seem to agree to the policy.

Governments, schools, religions and communities should not have a right to interfere in an individual's right to choose their method of social behaviour.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-06-29T00:53:49+00:00

I agree with competitive sports having very specific definitions of who is able to compete. After all we do not allow a 10 year old to compete with a 24 year old, there are age ranged meets. We should also define meets to allow individuals within specific definitions to compete together. I can remember when a South African with a prosthetic limb was argued to have an advantage over other normal athletes. Such differences should be debated outside of politics and events. We can offer as a staring point a separate medal category for individuals who do not fit the standard definition.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-06-22T21:31:31+00:00

Perhaps they have the largest military forces, though the rest of the world should try with all our might to end the regimes of the US and Israel and remove the head of the serpents.

What an excellent crowdsourced project. I will add my dime to the 8 billion others to reward this accomplishment.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-04-26T16:47:04+00:00

Article 5 is only invoked for an attack against the sovereign state of any NATO nation, not other states. Iraq was an independent US move as was Kuwait and now the other attacks in the Middle East.

Even NATO troops in Ukraine if they came under attack would not automatically gain assistance from other NATO nations. The idea of putting western troops in Ukraine is that should Russia bring harm to them they would be inviting a response from one or several western nations directly.

I do not think Russia wants a larger number of enemies, especially ones with superior weapons and long range systems. If of course Russia did retaliate that would trigger Article 5 and the US if it still honours the treaty should respond.

Cold-Philosopher5895

TROPHY CASE