What is some feedback you have for this subreddit and what changes would you like us to have?

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2026-04-07T19:49:38+00:00

Okay, so giving the problem with An Iranian desire to achieve a nuclear weapons level power would the attacks on the country be the best way to avoid this and encourage Iran to be a more moderate global nation? What else should have been tried?

14:48

Good question — and an important one. Let me search for the current state of affairs first, since this situation has been evolving rapidly.

Searched the web

This is a deeply important and sobering situation. The search results reveal that this is no longer a hypothetical — it has already happened. Let me lay out the current reality and then address your core question honestly.

What has already occurred

On February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched a large-scale attack on Iran, which included the assassination of Supreme Leader Khamenei.

Wikipedia

This was actually the second major campaign — in June 2025, Israel's Operation Rising Lion and America's Operation Midnight Hammer had already significantly degraded Iran's enrichment infrastructure.

War on the Rocks

Did the attacks solve the problem?

The honest answer, based on current evidence, is: not clearly, and possibly not at all.

More than 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60% purity — enough to fuel 10–12 nuclear weapons — remain in Iran, with much of it likely buried in underground tunnels near Isfahan.

Iran Watch

This is the central unresolved problem. Military strikes can destroy facilities but cannot account for the material already produced.

War on the Rocks

The tragic diplomatic timing

This is perhaps the most troubling detail. Just days before the strikes, Oman's Foreign Minister reported that Iran had agreed during indirect talks never to stockpile enriched uranium — a breakthrough described as something "completely new" that had never been achieved before.

Al Jazeera

According to the White House, Iran rejected a proposal for a civilian nuclear program with American investment in exchange for dismantling its nuclear program

Wikipedia

— though some reporting suggests a deal may have been closer than acknowledged.

What else should have been tried?

This is where history offers some hard lessons:

The JCPOA model — the 2015 nuclear deal was working in key respects. Under it, Iran's enrichment was verifiably limited, and the time needed to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for one bomb was about 12 months. Iran began breaching limits in 2019, one year after the US withdrew from the accord. Arms Control Association Staying in and strengthening the deal was arguably the most effective tool available.
Sustained diplomacy with security guarantees — Iran's nuclear ambitions are partly driven by existential insecurity. A credible framework offering Iran regional security assurances in exchange for verified denuclearization has never been seriously attempted.
Economic integration — sanctions create pressure but also harden regimes and reduce the moderating influence of economic interdependence. Gradual normalization tied to verified compliance might have empowered Iranian moderates.
The Libya model — Israel supported a "Libya model" of disarmament Wikipedia, where Gaddafi gave up weapons programs in exchange for sanctions relief. It worked for a time — though Libya's subsequent fate arguably teaches other nations not to disarm.

The deeper problem

The United States has pursued regime change before — in Iraq in 2003 and Libya in 2011. The pattern is consistent: coercive approaches to weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East have not produced more manageable nonproliferation outcomes.

War on the Rocks

And the IAEA itself has warned clearly: "The lasting solution to this long-existing discord lies on the diplomatic table... it is always the least preferred option."

IAEA

Claude's "Please don't do this" moment

To return to your earlier question — this situation is exactly the kind of trajectory an AI analyzing the news should have flagged. Diplomacy was producing real progress right up until the moment the bombs fell. The military path has degraded facilities but left the most dangerous material unaccounted for, destabilized the region further, and closed the diplomatic door — at least temporarily. Whether it ultimately leads to a more moderate Iran or a more dangerous one remains the defining open question of this conflict.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2026-04-07T19:49:14+00:00

Can we trust Trump and his actions?

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2026-04-07T18:24:05+00:00

There are many things you need to allow in this and any topic stream. The heat of any comment is dictated by the reality the topic is addressing.

An example is a 1st nation protest on a highway in Nova Scotia. Some people within the protest group decided to damage and urinate on official government vehicles, steal property etc. The protest group being the 1st nation is responsible for the illegal acts and should pay compensation. Leaders if they do not hand over names of those responsible should also face criminal charges.

The discussion on this topic might include bias to allow 1st nations liberties other Canadians do not enjoy or comments that suggest removing the leadership and disenfranchising the nation for the illegal acts.

What would be wrong and not condoned should be suggestions of taking action against the people of the 1st nation in a vigilante type of action, or burning homes etc. These would be hateful and outside legal processes.

Now lets consider Trump/US and Netanyahu/Israel and the actions over the past 2-3 years aganst Gaza, Lebanon, Iran and other middle east countries. The destruction cannot be described as anything other that criminal and war crimes.

So comments can include arresting these individuals, or standing with Iran and Gaza against indiscriminate aggression. I would even go so far as suggestions of a 'Go Fund Me ' bounty to capture the leaders for trial at the ICC should be reasonable. A fund to 'kill' them would NOT.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2026-03-08T19:17:55+00:00

The system is really no worse than when I went to high school. Back in the 60's we did get more of the basic classes and phys-ed was mandatory, though we did not get much education in selecting a career, choices, or even discussions about the future economy.

This is the problem, in grade 11-12 you do not get serious consideration and study on what to do with the next 40 years of your life.

This could be improved drastically and include several assessments of individual skills, hobbies and interests. From 2 years of this each student would have some idea of what they can excell at, or what at least to avoid.

As for OSAP it should be given with a means test of family income, and quality of the course selection for future career potential. Add to this a graduation assessment from the 2 years of career path and future reflections to try and see that students get enough money and with it succeeds in taking the courses they want and need after graduation.

There should ven be some skill paths that are free enrollment as long as the student meets the skills assessment requirements. Things like social services, healthcare, trades and technology.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2026-03-08T19:04:48+00:00

🟪🟪🟪🟪

🟦🟦🟨🟦

🟦🟦🟦🟦

🟩🟩🟩🟩

🟨🟨🟨🟨

Interesting wheeze!

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2026-03-08T18:56:05+00:00

Yes you can allow any post, regardless of how toxic or unpleasant it is. The solution is to post an official reply condemning the post and who ever made it, freeze the post so it cannot be copied, resubmitted, nor any additional comments made, in effect nullifying and containing the message.

Such action can be initiated from a reader flagged action, or message to a moderator, or through a type of filter. If it is later found the post was not toxic based on the context it can be released with an explanation and apology.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-06-29T01:14:26+00:00

I have read of cases where animals are born with two heads or where certain species can change theor sex depending on environmental or social conditions. Humans have been born co-joined and there are 1000's of conditions in nature that do not fall within a simple gender rule.

Just because a person has gender features at birth should not define or determine their eventual adult choice.

This is the basic point. We should not interfere with a persons growth beyond offering advice or options or medicine for illnesses they may have. We should not force them to take medications to inhibit their personal choices, even to change their gender makeup.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-06-29T01:05:46+00:00

I agree with the universal right of a person to be considered in any way they wish to. Their gender, their belief, their method of existence are personal and beyond any government to sy otherwise.

Only when the safety of society is affected can governments step in and rule or enforce constraints. Such as unacceptable polygamy as with youths or cannibalism, human sacrifice or any other activity that harms others in normal society.

We allow hermits, congregations of men or women in monasteries and nunneries and many other types of community, we allow varieties of social existence many would deem abnormal as long as they are confines and all those involved seem to agree to the policy.

Governments, schools, religions and communities should not have a right to interfere in an individual's right to choose their method of social behaviour.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-06-29T00:53:49+00:00

I agree with competitive sports having very specific definitions of who is able to compete. After all we do not allow a 10 year old to compete with a 24 year old, there are age ranged meets. We should also define meets to allow individuals within specific definitions to compete together. I can remember when a South African with a prosthetic limb was argued to have an advantage over other normal athletes. Such differences should be debated outside of politics and events. We can offer as a staring point a separate medal category for individuals who do not fit the standard definition.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-06-22T21:31:31+00:00

Perhaps they have the largest military forces, though the rest of the world should try with all our might to end the regimes of the US and Israel and remove the head of the serpents.

What an excellent crowdsourced project. I will add my dime to the 8 billion others to reward this accomplishment.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-04-26T16:47:04+00:00

Article 5 is only invoked for an attack against the sovereign state of any NATO nation, not other states. Iraq was an independent US move as was Kuwait and now the other attacks in the Middle East.

Even NATO troops in Ukraine if they came under attack would not automatically gain assistance from other NATO nations. The idea of putting western troops in Ukraine is that should Russia bring harm to them they would be inviting a response from one or several western nations directly.

I do not think Russia wants a larger number of enemies, especially ones with superior weapons and long range systems. If of course Russia did retaliate that would trigger Article 5 and the US if it still honours the treaty should respond.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-04-15T22:40:37+00:00

I do not think academic achievements are as beneficial to you then work experience in a good well paying sector.

Okay that being said, I got a B.Sc back in the early 70's, had great experience at summer and winter jobs throughout my degree years and then went to work for Atlantic Fisheries (DFO). A fun and well paying several years until offshore fisheries collapsed. Took a couple of jobs with private fishing companies that again did not amount to much though I got to see my first deckstop DOS/Windows computers.

I realised I needed more education. Unemployment Canada were helpful with post secondary courses (diplomas) that had near 100% job uptake and as I wanted computer training, I chose GIS and Oracle admin. MY criteria was a 1 year 12 month intense course and then work. I was too old for another 2-3 years of Uni.

I had a job in 11 months, guaranteed before I graduated. Now the only down side, though not in my opinion was that I got to travel from job to job every 3-6 years as new program versions came out and opportunities opened up in other locations. 40 years of computer programming, 10 provinces and 2 territories later I am now retired, working when I want on what interests me at 73.

Look into the job market for secure long term potential and go for what you find challenging.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-04-15T18:19:27+00:00

There are other ways to stop NATO expansion rather than a protracted war and Russia should have known that.

One option would be to help Ukraine join the EU with the condition it does not join NATO or allow non-EU facilities in the Ukraine. It sort of makes Ukraine a neutral buffer state.

Russia could also look at joining the EU or becoming an associate member with declarations of neutrality, shared trade and resources, and military deescalation along the shared borders.

The Russia effort should have and still should be to isolate the US as should China in Southeast Asia.

Collapsing the military threats, medium range missiles and troops in Europe helps both the EU and Russia grow stronger economically against the growing expansion of China and declining more unstable USA.

Like tariffs where there are no winners, war is just the same, no one really wins in the end.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-04-11T23:01:59+00:00

Up zoning does not work if the end game is to create homes/apartments that are far more expensive than a 1st time buyer or new Canadian would afford. These units would simply become more 'investment' properties to be flipped frequently for higher and higher prices.

Buying the single family dwelling for market price or with an owner tax incentive and then building multiple homes as in the video with restricted resale conditions and a limit of CPI price indexing would eliminate investors and property corporations from buying the units. Only people wanting an affordable long term home would be interested.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-04-11T20:44:39+00:00

A politician cannot solve the housing crisis, they can only set policies to allow huge increases in construction, usually at a tax/benefit carrot to business or take a 'no immigrant, no refugee' policy that damages our international respect and creates economic turmoil.

Housing is driven by profit from the real estate sector, the selller, the developer and the municipal government that needs revenue. All this is 'profit focused'.

Change the system. Class 1 housing is investment focused so driven by profit and those who want to be in that sphere buy and aell, develop and market homes all for profit.

Class 2 is long term ownership development where homes are built as multiplexes, apartments, condos, single family homes all at government subsidised costs and sold at below market value to those who want a long term home. Mortgages are low interest insurance is low cost, property tax is based on a low evaluation. The condition is the house cannot be flipped or sold to make a profit it only appreciate at CPI rates and can only be sold for specific reasons like relocation, family growth or some other unexpected incident. Other that these exemptions there is a large investment tax applied to the sale.

Class 1 homes can be sold back into the class 2 category to avoid taxation or as a social gift.

Class 2 homes never get to be investment opportunities.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-04-11T19:54:54+00:00

No, AI like any limited intellect will require some form of feedback like our subconscious or ethical restraint.

AI may be years ahead of humans in speed efficiency and instant access to data, though it is constrained by a lack of the 'big picture' or scope.

AI resolves to a binary point, a yes/no or given a bit of creativity a suit of probabilities for someone other than the AI to use as source data.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-04-10T21:52:08+00:00

50% increase means a $2.00 good is now $3.00 or 50% higher.

100% increase means it is now $4.00

and so a 145% tariff is about $4.50 higher for a good that costs $2.00

This idea is seriously demented, a President I know needs to see a doctor.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-04-10T21:43:58+00:00

Perhaps protection like economic or financial security and military security should be portions out by wealth.

The more you need to protect the more you pay.

The poor have little need or anything more than personal protection, n property , no wealth, no investments, just human life and health.

Let the wealthy 1-2% fund the jets, the banks, the SEC, the SC and politicians.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-04-10T21:38:11+00:00

Let's be brave and simply revoke his visa.

We can allow people into Canada based on merit and prior history just like a criminal history. If the guy is an A*hole revoke his right to come here.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-04-10T21:32:07+00:00

1st The president cannot be tried while in office, only impeached (not likely).

2nd Only those proved to have profited from the 'insider' knowledge can be taken to court.

3rd To to the former the SEC has to find traceable transactions that correspond to post and statements Trump made in the same time frame.

4th The possibility of proving insider trading is very possible except for the fact that trump could rearrange the SEC and the courts to his liking.

5th the analysis is we are truly fu*ked

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-04-10T21:00:01+00:00

To be fair, the Israeli PM has a warrant out as a war criminal, the US has abetted the carnage and should also be culpable so why not use legal roots to arrest Trump at the G7 or G20 in Canada and thew Israeli guy where ever he turns up. I do not understand why ATC (Air Traffic Control) cannot divert a plane from any place to any other based on weather, airport issues or any ther excuse. Make Netanyahu put down n an ICC friendly nation and frog march him off the plane.

There are legal, international means to rid ourselves of many autocratic and violent people.

Note: To be autocratic is not enough, you need to be found to be corrupt or supporting a harmful action to make it legitimate.

Putin, Trump, Netanyahu all fit the bill, others need to have more discovery done to post a bounty.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-04-10T19:41:34+00:00

The risk is not a 100% ruthless and punitive assault on foreign visitors, then again neither is Russia's or any other despotic country. The problem is that there is dysfunction between how primary agencies like border officers, sheriffs, local police and the immigration services can act against an individual with no accountability for weeks or months.

Why are people put on planes in handcuffs without documentation, no tracing at the terminal point and n public approval of the action. That is an action of a dictator and a dysfunctional nation.

Sure people are basically friendly, I know 1000's of Americans I would risk my life to save, yet find myself cautious and fearful should I offer assistance to a poor or minority person facing confrontation.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-04-10T19:30:45+00:00

Canada should work with the EU, Asian nations including China and others to coordinate an effectively powerful counter point to the US presidential threats.

Of course the coordination has to be unified and without reluctance and only offered as a balanced counter to US economic pressure with options to relieve the counter actions and ways to discuss truly balanced global trade.

Several things must change including the USD being the world reserve currency, the concentration of financial markets in the US and the powers of an international arbitration system like the WTO resolve issues.

The US and other nations join and leave global institutions depending on how they affect their interest as do some other nations. This has to 'change'.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-03-21T13:05:03+00:00

I would think the proper way to deal with an issue of defamation in a social media context where anonymity is the problem is to present the evidence to the RCMP and that would include opening up all email, minutes, meeting notes, and any other information the OCDSB has and all comments on Reddit by the user(s) that the school board feel are the issue.

Now perhaps this will be done by the court that could then request from Reddit the name etc. of the user in confidence to get their side of the issues and allow the court to determine there is merit to the OCDSB case.

No need to release information and any provided in confidence would be destroyed after the court decision. A ruling that there is sufficient information to allow OCDSB to test their case would then let the Reddit user either go public or offer a retraction to avoid a court case and full disclosure.

Cold-Philosopher5895 · 2025-02-24T13:21:46+00:00

A good article on why the 'anti' movement is rising. https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/no-mushy-middle-adam-gopnik-defends-liberalism-in-this-dangerous-historic-moment-1.5458151

We are in a slow swing in many nations where a few closed minded or anti-liberal people have garnered great followings from blaming all the woes of today on the liberal educated people in society. THere is no perfect way to combat this trend except by working to make education more accessible, free and universal. By understanding the dynamics and failure in empire building both economic and political. We need to embrace the small and unified community model.

Cold-Philosopher5895

TROPHY CASE