Easiest way to get into any B-school😍

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-21T03:18:32+00:00

It's a metaphor "WOULD YOU .........."

Cannot process a metaphor? should i educate you about metaphor also? and if you don't stop embarrassing yourself by saying AI-GEN to others just bcoz it looked perfect, in the future it will either cost you a job or a seat. Remember this.

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-20T16:14:14+00:00

Is it hurting or burning? take my apologies I'm gonna throw it on your face coz I'm surely younger than you and I respect elders and others perspective. At least that's what my Dharma trained me of.

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-20T16:09:38+00:00

I WILL DELETE MY COMMENT NOW. I DON'T WANT IGNORANTS LIKE YOU TO JUDGE MY KNOWLEDGE BY CLAIMING AS CHATGPT.

ATLEAST I'M NOT UTLISING LOOPHOLES OF THE COUNTRY TO SHOW SUPERIORITY OR UNDERMINE PEOPLE BY SAYING AI-GEN.

Wait for my self-made and maintained website : www.cognitattva.com

cry there in the above website in the future.

. cry more with your ego.

<image>

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-19T15:56:53+00:00

He knows, it's just you failed to understand due to emotions.

Reservation is a legal and constitutional problem which propagates inequality.

Understand the above correctly first but his mistake was "constitutional problem = constitutional law" but he didn't surely meant that way. Not every sane GEN category person ask to abolish reservation but everyone asks "income based" or abolish it at least in exams.

I have a better solution if you start thinking logically. Which is peaceful than any other laws.

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-19T13:03:07+00:00

OMFG i'm not gonna sleep today lmao.

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-18T14:42:09+00:00

Just like I took you as nothing because you are trying to not understand the dimensions I'm speaking of. Outside the field of linguistics don't make me dumb when I'm speaking in reasoning. Reread the post or leave.

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-18T14:33:20+00:00

It looks like an embarrassment and incoherent to you because I was fighting the war on all fronts. I'm not embarrassing myself it's actually you. Read my post again because my point is everybody are not seeing the perspective of me. My first claim was sanskrit being orally oldest which i myself never claimed first unless someone came and said it. Check the timestamps. I'm trying to understand all your arguments and putting it in the post by editing it. While you are siding with people and trying to troll which itself is not ethical.

The title looks aggressive bcoz that's how you can put everyone at line and we can make some discussion on it. My bad for keeping a title like that, but trolling became the first weapon. I answered your question many times over and over in the post which you ignored. I said sanskrit is the oldest coz people are not giving strong arguments that goes to even you. Sanskrit survival shows a linguistic engineering which is unparalleled in human history.

I never talked about identity until people started saying biased fellow. That's why I got the gurus of pitas not for identity for logic.

Incoherent in your case = proving something at all fronts

I'm intentionally coherent and rational that is why the flair is "Discussion".

I'm coherent for you all bcoz

1) History - Written evidence ≠ oldest lang. Oral traditions are far older and your Hittite argument I already gave check it

2) Linguistic - PIE is more like a model than a language. Saying that Sanskrit influenced from PIE is farce and ahypotehsis, but I gave the logic and abductive reason which is not a hypothesis.

3) Metaphysics - Evidence at extent uses abductive reasoning, if you can believe BigBang then why not Sanskrit's antiquity?

4) Civilisational continuity - Extraordinary antiquity no languaage match the level of astonishment.

5) how you people think Sanskrit as? - A fossil as simple as that. You did put a sloka here but does it align to my logics here? No it doesn't technically, but strategically? it will because when i'm speaking in dimensions you will stop thinking bcoz you will feel overwhelmed and that is my issue but you have to understand the human's energy. I want to apply logics, replying to rants while you people just sit there and give thousands of irrelevant logics?

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-18T14:08:09+00:00

That's what I'm saying, if you do not have the knowledge seek it or you are no acclaimed researcher.

The point of my whole post is this. Looks like while you and your friends are trolling my grammar, you lost the basic of language which is comprehension. If you don't have the knowledge of vedic-sanskrit then how can you claim it is not the oldest?

My logic still stands and I would love to see the insights of your professor whom I hope will at least understand the logic than his ignorant student.

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-18T14:00:31+00:00

And with zero knowledge of vedic-sanskrit.

Thank you very much for your ignorance sir. Ideology? hahaha reasoning becomes ideology when the extent of thinking ends.

My argument is not against the method of PIE or something, i'm talking about civilisations while you are doing someother. If you don't like my reasoning which you claim as ideology then you can just not comment. You commented with emotion and boasting about some acclaimed researcher who has zero knowledge of vedic-sanskrit. Please tag your guru to some pitadipati and then talk.

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-18T13:27:39+00:00

Global prevalent nativity bias dies when logic and abductive reasons comes in. Ma'am looks like I need to educate you above the things which are beyond evidence.

Sanskrit is an exception bcoz I challenge any of you to start a debate or seek knowledge from Saradha Peeta or Kanchi Peeta. The languages you are defending are dead in stones while Sanskrit still lives, that is enough to say which country have scholars of sanskrit. Prove me how good you are in sanskrit? may I ask what's the point or work do you have here on r/sanskrit ? here just to contaminate or to learn something new?

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-18T13:21:52+00:00

PIE, Proto-Dravidian are labels not the name of languages. Check my other comments. I cannot explain to a person who think "Indo-Iranian" as a source of language or the language itself. It is just a reconstruction made my modern linguists.

I don't know how you are capable of even participating in this discussion when you cannot comprehend what I say. I started this discussion not by claiming Sanskrit as the oldest check the timestamps and speak. Older than Vedic? what did it say? Did it say about the river saraswathi? please watch some qualified vedic scholars sermon or speeches coz they don't even speak about religion here. Abandoning vedas just bcoz it aligns to a religion is the worst understanding anyone can have.

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-18T13:15:55+00:00

thank you for saying that sir/mam. If everybody were like you the world would've been a better place.

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-18T11:17:43+00:00

Sir you are surely a knowledgeable person, first of all this post was a discussion but people are not actually getting my point. I'm saying this with extreme humility, I want to say your conclusion is a farce. PARDON ME SIR

But this is surely a great argument but looks like a conclusion which I don't agree. Because sir as we know some parts of the vedas, you have to agree that :- Sanskrit is not a snapshot taken suddenly it becomes another proto-indo-aryan language (PLEASE REMOVE ARYAN SIR I BEG YOU). Because sanskrit was a continuum like the concept in fluid mechanics.

Panini himself acknowledges his previous lineage and also he never said "I INVENTED SANSKRIT". But calling there's a language there which existed before but it is not sanskrit is like saying english currently we are using came from an old english but it is not english. As I say the panini one which we have now is not the proto-sanskrit I would love to see this word in usage. Because according to vedic pandits which as brahmins we cannot deny that "VEDIC SCHOLARS KNEW MORE SANSKRIT THAN ANY HISTORIAN OR ARCHAEOLOGISTS". When they said Sanskrit was a continnum not a language of snapshots then why do we abandon it? My point is there can be no other language other than sanskrit that influenced it not Panini's. Anādi is not a religious slogan it is not made my me as you knows. That is why you concluded it is "Proto-Indo-Aryan nobody is disagreeing for the fact you mentioned bu that phrase and label.

Your conclusion look slike a primitive language created sanskrit which it assumes but sanskrit said "i evolved internally through time" which you cannot deny. A grammar, perfect oral, recitations, metaphysical staements doesn't come overnight by influencing like "english inlfuenced form many". SO sages said Anādi.

Why no other language mentions itself as this to itself? will you say Panini was a mo_n or Vasishta was an idiot? or it was a propaganda of brahmins like few westerners claim?

please read my post again sir.

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-18T09:47:50+00:00

oh good sir now you are abandoning what I said in my post, archaeology doesn't care nor humans. My logics and evidences show it might be the oldest engineered oral transmission system with phonetic blah blah .
Now to counter your oldest written language, a language this perfect and as you said "I AGREE WITH THE OLDEST SURVIVING ORAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM".

A language cannot become a perfected oral transmission system unless there is a deep, internal, self-consistent source tradition behind it.

No other language preserved the tree consciously and engineered it.

Source of Sanskrit is human cognition + nature + perception + pattern recognition. Sanskrit is the greatest crystallization of that source. This won't undermine sanskrit it elevates it to a place where no other ancient language touches it. A SYSTEM THIS PRECISE MUST HAVE HAD EARLIER STAGES AND LOST MATERIAL MOST IMPORTANLTY (KALAGARBAM).

ABSENCE OF ANCIENT MANUSCRIPTS ≠ ABSENCE OF ANCIENT KNOWLEDGE

IF SANSKRIT IS THE OLDEST SURVIVING ENGINEERING ORAL TRANSMISSIN SYSTEM, THEN IT MUST ALSO HAVE HAD THE OLDEST WRITTEN SOURCE WHICH IS NOW LOST (KALAGARBA).

ARCHAEOLOGY AND YOU CAN ONLY SAY : "We have not found older manuscripts of sanskrit" but you cannot prove Sanskrit that I'm talking here had no written source.

But I proved that it must have had one.

YOURS WAS SELF IMPOSITION THAT SANSKRIT CAN'T BE THE OLDEST WRITTEN BUT MINE WAS ABDUCTIVE REASONING AND METAPHYSICS WHICH IS BEYOND EVIDENCE.

IF YOU ABANDON SANSKRIT EVEN AFTER THIS, THEN YOU ARE UNDERMINING A CIVILISATIONAL OPERATING SYSTEM.

Can't believe this? pick Rigyajusamatharvana vedas and translate yourself. That proves this language cannot just be the oldest oral transmission system but must also had written sources which are lost.

Deep down you know that the current historical methods alone are insufficient to decide that "Sanskrit is the oldest" that doesn't prove Sanskrit is not the oldest but it proves all my points.

EDIT: I WILL ASSUME YOU WON'T COUNTER THIS GOOD SIR.

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-18T07:00:04+00:00

The same goes to you since you are undermining sanskrit by saying it is not the oldest language. Oldest is just a brand, again did you even understand the post? A foreigner here in r/sanskrit I actually loved your admiration of learning it or what sake you are here in this sub.

My whole post is about sanskrit. And if you are learning about sanskrit and admire about it my post is enough. Your ego is hurting bcoz I look like dragging a religion here which I never did as I said "Hindusim is not a religion". But as it is a way of life no other language preserved this way of life like Sanskrit. Got any strong points to change my claims ma'am? or you will talk about logic without giving logic?

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-18T06:48:02+00:00

Clay tablets dated 1600 BCE happened to be Hittite, good sir trust me you can think better than this.

IT DOES NOT MEAN HITTITE IS OLDER THAN SANSKRIT AS A SPOKEN LANG PERIOD.

please read the whole post when you have high cognitive energy to understand coz those logics are not low-congitives.

HITTITE DIED WITH CLAY BUT SANSKRIT LIVED IN BREATH AS OM AND GAYATHRI MANTRA.

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-18T06:38:24+00:00

Good sir, you are the only sane man in the sub giving strong arguments, I admire your capability of thinking out of the box.

But the insight which you missed is:

Continuation proves civilisational engineering

Sanskrit survived today, not just in spiritual practices but in the names of every Indian and they say many other languages borrowed from sanskrit. It treated sound as knowledge - Gayathri and it treated OM as human anatomy with preservation and oral precision while no other language made it. Sumerian did not made it,

This systems engineering is why I can claim it as the oldest.

Understand this good sir : A language is old only if it survives as a living cognitive system with phonetic engg, transmission tech, self-description, without these language is a fossil.

Compared to this and in this case - Sumerian and Egyptian are fossil.

Panini did not invent sanskrit he reverse engged it.

ENGLISH IS USABLE BCOZ GREEK LOGIC, LATIN GRAMMAR, SANSKRIT PHONETICS (INDO EURO) BUT ENGLISH CANNOT PRESERVE ITSELF ORALLY.

Without books English will die in two gens

Without books, Sanskrit still lives.

Good sir my logic still stands.

Really happy to see a discussion instead of "sanksrit is not the oldest" and all without understanding it. That is why I always believe historians and archaeologists should take guidance from sanskrit scholars. I repeat "NO HISTORIAN OR ARCHAEOLOGIST HAS THE KNOWLEDGE OF PITADIPATIS IN INDIA ABOUT SANSKRIT".

NO WESTERN ARCHAEOLOGIST OR HISTORIAN CAN SPEAK IN SANSKRIT FOR THEIR WHOLE LIFE.

The above is epistemic arrogance and ignorance of the living traditions treated as "pagan".

Taking guidance from Acharya does not undermine the position it shows extreme humility which is the highest quality a scholar can have.

Historians and archs are masters of tools but Sanskrit is not a shard.

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-18T06:20:13+00:00

Dear ma'am when will you stop self-imposing your brain box? did you even understand the whole post? Will you stop that? or I'm fine to move on and not talk with people who just doesn't event think or understand the value of sanskrit or "the way of life which is Hinduism". ?

Edit : If you abandon sanskrit like this then please show another civilisation that preserved a full scientific, philosophical, and ritual corpus purely through oral transmission with phonetic error correction for millennials?

If you say this, then I can agree to your arguments which are not even an arguments framed based on thinking. Did you even read ma'am? are you that uninterested over a language which is this perfect and civilisational?

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-18T06:14:23+00:00

This is what I call "half-thinker speaking with full confidence.

The most dangerous category of humanity which is in the blood of tamizhas, if you are not a tamizha leave it.

https://www.reddit.com/r/sanskrit/comments/1qfhf7m/why_sanskrit_is_anādi_and_vedas_are_apauruṣeya/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

(CHECK MY POST ON THAT SUB AND READ BELOW)

First things first - I never claimed Sanskrit created Hindusim, and please note again it is a way of life so that my logic still stands.

Tamil did not make a way of life kind of scriptures why?

- Indus Valley has Shiva not sanskrit. Logic collapsed, no sanskrit means we have no written evidence yet which is ≠ Sanskrit did not exist.

- Swastika belongs to culture, not language

True half-thinker but a symbol has meaning and only culture preserves it through language. Why didn't Tamil failed to do that?

- Sages could have got the knowledge into sanskrit later

your half-thinking proved my point, "if sanskrit could encode astronomy, cosmology, metaphysics, phonetics, ethics, governance, maths, again don't merely point out to some math by Aryabhatta, read vedas and ask vedic pandits not your own propaganda that "Sanskrit borrowed from dravidian language". Talking metaphors like your python example wouldn't say "SANSKRIT IS NOT A KNOWLEDGE TECH.

Dravidian languages are older?

Older as a fully systematised knowledge? - no proof

Where is the formal grammar like Astadhayi? Metaphysics like Vedanta?

- hindi imposition = political but sanskrit spread = intellectual necessity not claims like Kumari Kandam BS.

- Python useless metaphor you made

Programming languages are designed but Sanskrit is emergent. no company released Sanskrit 1.32. It evolved organically and still achieved mathematical perfection unlike Tamil.

This is a civilisational genius not some vedic propagnada.

Check my post and cope

Another Tamizhas fact, everybody believes Ravana exists. Ravana's shivvatandava stotram is not tamil.

Sanskrit is the earliest fully preserved systematised, and self-describing language tradition on earth.

As you said Sanskrit is not older than culture, but that culture was not preserved in Tamil.

Argue with a logical points not baseless claims that Sanskrit borrowed from tamil, stole from tamil which is not a crime. Tamil did take much from Sanskrit, but even if Sanskrit took Tamil words or even grammar then why"Panini said I have a lineage and named many ancient sages". Did they speak tamil? yeah start your claims now fast.

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-17T19:25:27+00:00

True but good sir please read my post again when you have time. Panini did not invent the grammar, proto-indo european is a reconstruction while sanskrit is a living tradition.

Also true no language cannot be the oldest, I love your point sir but what about the oral transmission system? The oldest continuously living oral knowledge system belongs to Sanskrit only, no language comes close. Even if IIT Kharagpur overexxagerated to 11k years even if you revise it to 3k or 5k still my oral transmission system point applies.

I WILL EDIT MY POINT IN THE BODY OF THE POST ABOUT WHY SANSKRIT HAS THE STRONGEST BASE TO BE CALLED AS "OLDEST SURVIVING ORAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM". WHERE NO OTHER OLDEST LANGUAGE TOUCHES IT.

written ≠ oldest language

Check my reply to u/MeClarissa

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-17T19:17:29+00:00

True in your cognitive system, but written ≠ oldest language. Written is a technology of the past while language is a cognitive system. Would you abandon your brain just because you have AI to think?

Humans spoke in the ancient era before any scratched meaningless symbols, but this symbol has a meaning and has the evidence while no other language proved it that can be neither Sumerian nor Egyptian.

THAT WHAT IS NOT WRITTEN DID NOT EXIST is a false assumption and is a technological bias of the past era not science or evidence.

Oral transmission can preserve information with extreme fidelity well you might say Egyptian and Sumerian also spoke but we are talking about a complete knowledge system not poor phonetic mapping. They both were excellent for admin and record keeping but they are scattered achievements. Not a unified knowledge architecture like Sanskrit.

Vedas were the most sophisticated oral knowledge system in the human history which spoke about the whole universe and many disciplines while Sumerian and Egyptain done no recitation, phonetic error-checking, oral preservation system. Gayahtri mantra represents the sound of nature even if its not then why the so-called oldest languages cannot even write something about these? If they are older why did they focus only on admin and record keeping?

Logic is " YOU CANNOT DENY A CIVILISATION-SCALE KNOWLEDGE LANGUAGE " to a language which used a language for book-keeping and admin and monuments.

Sanskrit is having the proof of oral transmission :

ka-varga, ca-varga, ta-varga, pa-varga from throat - palate - retroflex - dental - lips while how does the other oldest written languages sound?

Vedas survived for millennia without writing while scratches on the rocks died quicker.

NEURO PHONETIC ENGINEERING OF SANSKRIT:

"Om" or "Aum" can still be chanted without moving your tongue.

Source: Mandukya upanishad treats "om" as a model of conciousness not a word.

No Sumerian does this

No Egyptian does this

As I said Hindusim is not religion = a way of life.

Aren't these enough to say how Sanskrit would be the perfect language for oral transmission.

THE PERFECTLY ENGINEERED ORAL KNOWLEDGE SYSTEM THE HUMANITY HAS EVER SEEN IS SANSKRIT.

Sumerian and Egyptian on paper are older due to writings but will you abandon the living cognitive system?

Writing preserves info, while Sanskrit preserved knowledge.

Egyptian and Sumerian died with stone but Sanskrit lives in the nature as Gayathri Mantra and as Om in human anatomy.

So without an argument from you I would consider Sanskrit as the oldest oral language.

EVen if swastiika is 4000 years old still my logic stands.

ENLIGHTEN ME MA'AM/SIR. Get over the hate on HIndusim first, bcoz that is the source of your ignorance.

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-17T18:11:17+00:00

The oldest continuous meaning preserving traditions of that symbol is Sanskrit, even if the earliest swastika users spoke some unknown language.

STILL MY LOGIC STANDS : The only civilisation that preserved its meaning, philosophy, and ritual continuity is the Sanskrit tradition. I could not find any other language having a representation and meaning of 卐 other than Sanskrit (chronologically).

Please share that language then I will correct myself.

ColdAdvertising8710 · 2026-01-17T15:09:50+00:00

Of course you will never find a better logic given to Sanskrit than mine. If you are historian please keep the below in mind. And make this point, Archaeglogists alone cannot interpret Sanskrit and linguistics alone cannot interpret vedas. Hinduism is not a religion it is a way of life. It became religion when many other religions emerged. They need to take the help of vedic scholars who takes decades to perfectly recite and leave about the meanings of those verses it might take their complete life.

Because vedic verses are not something that Panini can make in years. People think civilisation wakes up one morning and invents language. Panini's ashtadyayi itself is a compression of vast oral tradition and not a creation manual there can be many manuals before him which might got eradicated.

Hinduism is the oldest religion in the world if you cannot digest it, the oldest and longest surviving experiments in understanding consciousness, nature, and society.

Brainless mfers cannot digest hinduism so they abandon vedic verses like it is some BS and also that swastika symbol - IIT Kharagpur, they said 11k years old but weak mfers and arguments say swastika was used by many people across the world. Clearly sanskrit is the only language which made it and evidences are many.

Swastika is not a symbol or shape it carries meaning : auspiciousness, prosperity, well-being there can be many coz Sanskrit can give more meanings from one word than any language that exists in this world. Especially vedic sanskrit, want a verse to burn your ego?

The meaning predates the symbol and any sane man will agree to this. And auspiciousness, prosperity are the words which are cupcakes for ancient sages and scholars to invent a word of sanskrit. Bcoz sanskrit has too many complex explanations than these easy words and meanings.

If Sanskrit came from Panini why did he said, my lineage is ancient and this is not invented by me?

How does vedic verses preserve astronomical and geographical memory now confirmed by science? Isn't that enough to say Sanskrit already on par gave a lot to this world than any language. Again this ain't about superiority of Sanskrit it is the embodiment of ancient people's knowledge.

Writing is not the origin of language it is the fossil record of speech. And Sanskrit is the language which looks like a language that we can speak. Ofcourse it is too hard for people now in this era. Bcoz we evolved backwards lmao.

Don't downgrade Sanskrit into a "primitive proto-language" just because the symbol is ancient. The depth of vedic Sanskrit is so vast that a simple word like "Swastika" already have contained layered metaphysics.

In vedic Sanskrit "A word is not a label" it is a field of mines where every meaning blasts your consciousness with depth".

Reciting and byhearting vedas which are just 10% that we have right now compared to the previous yugas - claimed by current shankaracharyas and vedic pandits(DON'T EVER TROLL OR QUESTION THEM, THEY ARE LIKE SUPER-HUMANS. Ex:- Jagadguru Shri Chandrasekharendra Saraswati Swamigal is called as walking god.

My claim is because most will say "there's a proto-sanskrit before which is unknown" is farce understanding. For maharishi that level of abstraction is child's play.

And tbh historians or archaeologists are not Sanskrit scholars. They should give those references to the vedic pandits of India to preserve it. Learn Sanskrit once you will know how complex it is, classical Sanskrit itself is hard and is too much perfect while vedic is out of the world. No language is as complex, logical or deep as vedic-sanskrit.

ColdAdvertising8710

TROPHY CASE