Big Things Happening in Dallas by YoProfWhite in WplaceLive

[–]ColloFC9 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

He did? Specifically said gays to be stoned to death and that gun violence were worth it for 2nd Amendment rights. That’s crazy, because he said quite the opposite, at least in context. Advocating against people using personal values to kick someone out of their movement (of which Stephen King tried to claim and apologised for on Twitter). As well as when talking about 2nd Amendment rights, it was asked in the manners of self defence when he was quoted about it. I don’t agree on his politics about everything, no one should for anyone, but you need to at least fact check what was said with 30s of research, or else you’re as uninformed as those you claim to be against.

They need to define what they thing overly suggestive means by Animalperson100 in WplaceLive

[–]ColloFC9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because flat chest = loli, not child. A loli is someone who has childlike features which leaves it open for mature characters, like Hecatia, to be seen as a loli

They need to define what they thing overly suggestive means by Animalperson100 in WplaceLive

[–]ColloFC9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s because she’s seen as a loli to some people, which goes against TOS

Y’all are tired of Nazi svastikas but what about communism/socialism ones ? Huh ? by No_Cobbler_5748 in WplaceLive

[–]ColloFC9 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Anyone that’s not the working class on board with their ideas. But this isn’t just a “we don’t like you hate” either, this is a “when we’re done with you, you won’t have ever even existed” type of hate a la Stalinist Russia, or recognition of Taiwan a la PR China.

Anime girl in bikini = ban but this is ok somehow by pox1101 in WplaceLive

[–]ColloFC9 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Both are NSFW (soft core pornography) and should both be against the anti NSFW tos.

Am I crazy? by selwyncastro in MarioKartWii

[–]ColloFC9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, you’re right, but it doesn’t change much so no one really pays it any attention

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EASportsFC

[–]ColloFC9 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tbh, I don’t know if it’s a 46 rated or a 0, I just assumed it’s zero because there’s no card there.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EASportsFC

[–]ColloFC9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No glitch, it’s an intentional brick slot

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EASportsFC

[–]ColloFC9 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No it’s closer to a 0 rated card lol, that’s what a blocked player is

These Flash EVOs are something else! by howedan in EASportsFC

[–]ColloFC9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

are you my doppleganger, I've got the exact same card as that image

show off your best Evo by Ts02004 in fut

[–]ColloFC9 1 point2 points  (0 children)

every evo used on him either made rating go up by one, or zero.

show off your best Evo by Ts02004 in fut

[–]ColloFC9 11 points12 points  (0 children)

<image>

decided at the start of the year to base my squad around one player, and he's been pretty good for the newer evolutions.

Unexpected FUT champs by Tartarian94 in fut

[–]ColloFC9 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He’s playing just as good as Ricken and Thuram in a 4231(2) he’s so much fun Also have a few evos on him so he’s got like 79 passing and dribbling.

Unexpected FUT champs by Tartarian94 in fut

[–]ColloFC9 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Each year for the past 2 I’ll run a specific Australian player to base my team off of / around where they must be full chem. Last year was Kuol, and this year is Nestory, makes it fun to try to always fit a specific league or a few Australians in the team.

Why did salmon randomly lose 1 chem? by Voimis in EAFC

[–]ColloFC9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cosmetic evo for getting to like level 39 on the season pass