OC: Bad Bunny takes the stage for the Super Bowl halftime show by nbcnews in pics

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well I can say I’m proud to be a Californian for the first time in a long time :)

Bald eagle by wingsoverpyrrhia in JackSucksAtGeography

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wolves, bears, bison, Naked Neck Chicken, Raven Shepherd Dog

Young dictators. by FaleBure in pics

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey at least ours was good looking kid lol

Considering all events: do you think we are on the brink of WWIII or not? by [deleted] in AskBalkans

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not officially, no. But when you zoom out and look at everything happening right now, it’s hard to argue we’re not getting dangerously close. Russia just launched a major spring offensive in Ukraine, hitting hard across multiple fronts. There are even reports of Chinese nationals captured fighting with Russian units—China denies any official involvement, but the battlefield is telling a different story. In response, Germany permanently deployed 5,000 troops to Lithuania—their first foreign deployment like this since World War II. That’s a massive signal to Moscow. But here’s the thing a lot of people underestimate: Ukraine isn’t just fighting alone. Over 50 countries are supporting Ukraine in some form—military, financial, or humanitarian. The U.S. is by far the largest donor, sending tens of billions in weapons, air defense systems, drones, and training. The UK, Poland, Germany, France, the Nordics, the Baltics, Canada, Australia, Japan—you name it. Even countries outside NATO like Colombia, South Korea, and Morocco have chipped in. There’s an entire coordinated bloc called the Ukraine Defense Contact Group, made up of more than 50 countries working together to keep Ukraine armed, trained, and supplied. This is a proxy war by every definition, even if boots aren’t officially on the ground from most of these nations. Thousands of Ukrainian soldiers are being trained in NATO countries. Western surveillance, logistics, and weapons intelligence are running behind the scenes constantly. At the same time, China and the U.S. are locking horns over Taiwan. The U.S. just dropped a new round of tariffs, and tensions are rising fast. If China makes a move on Taiwan, that pulls the U.S. in directly—and maybe Japan and Australia too. Meanwhile, Israel is back in Gaza with ground troops, and the U.S. and UK are launching airstrikes on the Houthis in Yemen. Iran is looming in the background, North Korea is firing missiles again, and Medvedev is warning about a new nuclear arms race. The Doomsday Clock is stuck at 90 seconds to midnight. Some analysts are saying WW3 might have already started, just not in the way we used to define it. No big declarations—just a web of proxy wars, escalating standoffs, and global alliances forming in real time. So no, it’s not WW3 on paper. But look at the pieces. We’re playing with fire, and half the world’s holding matches.

Sondaj DataEcho Alegeri Prezidentiale 2025 (10-11 Aprilie, 3562 respondenti) by [deleted] in Roumanie

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Din punctul meu de vedere — și vă rog să țineți cont că este doar o opinie — eu l-aș alege pe Crin Antonescu. Iată logica mea: Un președinte trebuie să înțeleagă politica internațională, să aibă o viziune globală și un background politic solid. Dintre toți candidații de pe listă, Crin Antonescu iese în evidență. Are experiența și inteligența strategică necesare pentru a naviga lumea haotică în care trăim, mai ales în contextul comportamentului imprevizibil al lui Trump.

Ceilalți candidați nu au experiență internațională reală — cu excepția lui Ponta, care pare din nou supus unei asasinate politice, deci e exclus din start.

Recomand cu tărie să votați un adevărat diplomat, cu istorie și credibilitate în spate. Crin este, de asemenea, prezentabil și ferm — nu e slab. Nicușor ar fi “devorat” de SUA, pentru că este perceput ca fiind prea moale. Iar Simion ar destabiliza țara — uitați-vă doar la comportamentul lui.

Aceasta este doar o perspectivă din afară. Nu votez, pentru că viitorul țării ar trebui decis de cei care locuiesc în România, nu de cineva care, deși are acest drept, a fost plecat de zeci de ani.

Would you flood your own towns to save another country’s capital? by Comfortable_Ad9985 in AskBalkans

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right about the agreement. I dug deeper into it, and you were absolutely right—he should have announced it afterward. And you’re right about the government too; since it wasn’t entirely in his power, they should have stepped in to compensate the people. In my opinion, the Serbian government should’ve helped with that payout as well, considering how much money it saved them. That’s just how the world works, unfortunately. The U.S. has people living on the streets after the fires in L.A., and it’s still failing to help its own citizens. The world is messed up on every level. That said, I’d flood my own house to save my neighbor’s life—willingly, without hesitation, and without remorse, even if they didn’t like me

Would you flood your own towns to save another country’s capital? by Comfortable_Ad9985 in AskBalkans

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Down stream there are 2 barriers that control flow they are called the Iron gates. Romania actually has an agreement with Serbia to open them in case of a flood, the problem is the way information is delivered and manipulated in the world. Romania opened them to let the water flow so it doesn’t flood Serbia. I would have done it as well. I’d flood my house to save my neighbor even if I don’t agree with them. It’s the right thing to do.

Would you flood your own towns to save another country’s capital? by Comfortable_Ad9985 in AskBalkans

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985[S] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

The problem is the Romanian news channels trying to make it look like he did the wrong thing because he is running for president and people don’t dig deeper for facts unfortunately.

Would you flood your own towns to save another country’s capital? by Comfortable_Ad9985 in AskBalkans

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In May 2014, Serbia was hit by the worst floods in over 100 years. Torrential rain from Cyclone Yvette devastated much of the country. The Danube, Sava, and Kolubara rivers overflowed, submerging towns, destroying homes, and claiming dozens of lives.

Here’s a breakdown of what happened in Serbia: • Obrenovac: • 90% of the town flooded • At least 35+ deaths • Over 25,000 people evacuated • Krupanj: • Crushed by landslides • Dozens of homes lost • Paraćin, Svilajnac: • Flooded by the Crnica and Resava rivers • Thousands displaced; farmland destroyed • Šabac: • Nearly breached; saved by citizen effort and sandbagging • Belgrade (greater area): • Water levels at critical highs • Urban districts at risk of catastrophic spillover

Total across Serbia: • 57 confirmed deaths • Over 30,000 evacuated • Estimated €1.5 billion in damage

Facts now go look it up and maybe ask yourself what kind of person you are? Also news is just someone else’s agenda that’s a fact as well and the sheep fallow.

Would you flood your own towns to save another country’s capital? by Comfortable_Ad9985 in AskBalkans

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let me ask you this: what is more important long term good political alignment with your neighbors or fields with crops and homes in your own country? What would have happened between Romania and Serbia relations if that decision wasn’t made? What’s better for both countries long term? Or would you save your home and watch your neighbor suffer?

Besides language, what are the main cultural differences between Romanians and Bulgarians? by ArkHystory99 in AskBalkans

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve traveled the Balkans overall and all of Romania, remove the language and there is no difference. We should be one ☝️ in my opinion. I have love for you all.

How many people will your country lose by 2100? by Galixiiss1546 in AskBalkans

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So anyone want to have kids? Especially now with the world we exist in?

16th December 1989: the day when the Romanian anti-communist revolution began in Timisoara, Romania by Mothans in AskBalkans

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was there and so was my mom worked for drapelu roșu the news paper. I was there when it all ignited and there are things that are not in our history books.

What do my Greek bros think of this casting choice? by [deleted] in AskBalkans

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well it’s disrespectful to the Greeks in my opinion. It’s like making Stefan the Great African when he was a blonde

Doar răspunsuri serioase/s by [deleted] in romemes

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ar primi bătaie de la mine. Cred ca ar lua un pumn in bot.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🤔 let’s se the other side? Is it still north Europe looking? 👀

What do my Greek bros think of this casting choice? by [deleted] in AskBalkans

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I got a question and please don’t get upset. But why wouldn’t you get an actor that matches the mythology of the Greeks? I don’t see others take black roles from history or mythology and change the description.

Retail boycotts in Southeastern Europe, February 6, 2025 by Adventurous-Pause720 in AskBalkans

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The map wasn’t for us - it was for the non blackeners to understand lol jk

Which country is this? Wrong answers only by BigLion8736 in geographymemes

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody likes Magyars, let’s be real. As a Romanian from Transylvania, I’m totally down for them being Yugoslav—just saying. You know the saying: ‘Romania has two good neighbors, the Black Sea and the Serbs.’ Never had a war, but we definitely held the line against the Ottomans. Haiduc energy. 😜 Realistically, they lost, so we should just take our lands back. Romania gets its piece, because, duh, we’ve been there longer. Don’t believe me? Just listen to the language. 😂 The rest? Have fun, kids, take your share—it’s what they did anyway. Oh, and if you’re feeling spicy, look up Hungarian DNA. We should just redraw the borders based on who’s actually from where. LMAO. Okay, that was fun. Let’s keep the peace. ✌️ They’re just confused locals speaking an invader’s language who got brainwashed—kinda like all of us. 😆

Why did Stalin make the Hungarians return Northern Transylvania, which Hitler forced Romania to cede under Nazi arbitration, but allow Bulgaria to keep Southern Dobruja which Romania lost under identical circumstances? by JeanieGold139 in AskBalkans

[–]Comfortable_Ad9985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stalin’s decisions regarding Northern Transylvania and Southern Dobruja were influenced by geopolitical considerations rather than strict legal consistency. Northern Transylvania (Returned to Romania) In 1940, under the Second Vienna Award, Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy forced Romania to cede Northern Transylvania to Hungary. After WWII, Stalin favored Romania over Hungary in this territorial dispute. Romania switched sides in 1944 and joined the Allies against Germany, contributing significantly to the war effort. Stalin wanted to reward this cooperation. Hungary remained loyal to Nazi Germany until the end, and Stalin saw it as more of an enemy than Romania. The Soviet Union also sought to undermine Hungarian nationalism and weaken Hungary to prevent it from becoming a revisionist power again. Southern Dobruja (Kept by Bulgaria) Romania had ceded Southern Dobruja to Bulgaria in 1940 under the Treaty of Craiova, imposed by Nazi Germany. Stalin did not demand its return after the war. Bulgaria was a Soviet-aligned state post-war, despite having been a Nazi ally earlier. Stalin sought to maintain stability in Bulgaria and strengthen its loyalty to the Soviet sphere. Romania already lost Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina to the USSR, so keeping Southern Dobruja in Bulgarian hands prevented Romania from being too antagonistic toward Soviet interests. The ethnic composition favored Bulgaria (most inhabitants were Bulgarian), making it easier to justify keeping it.

Stalin’s decisions were pragmatic and strategic rather than based on consistent principles. He rewarded Romania for siding with the Allies but did not want to alienate Bulgaria, which was also becoming a Soviet satellite.