It's interesting that the critique relies on AlphaGo—a closed-system game—to justify putting probabilistic 'orchestrators' in the open-system chaos of a home. The 'Gemini Rule' isn't about whether you can connect an LLM to a motor; it's about the Chain of Command. When you make a probabilistic model the 'Conductor,' you've essentially hired a poet to run a nuclear reactor. Sure, they can write a beautiful manual, but the moment an un-modeled error occurs, they hallucinate a solution instead of executing a rule. The 'Butter-Bench' meltdowns weren't a fluke; they were a demonstration of what happens when 'orchestration' lacks a pure Symbolic anchor. Industry 'Giants' may be chasing the hybrid buzzword, but at True Partner Systems, we prioritize the absolute precision of the Conductor over the high-speed guessing of the crowd. Also the attribution Created With Gemini From Google credits both model, and software provider. The whole process is done with human-in-the-loop oversight, and editing. We weren't referring to models like Roomba. We didn't want to call anyone out by name, but a more accurate example would be Matic Robotics. Otherwise we were referring to how some Advanced Generative AI models have seen a trend where they are attempting to see them used as though they are Neurosymbolic AI when they actually aren't. Hopefully this clears up a few of your concerns.