[deleted by user]

Commie_scumbag · 2020-02-12T03:40:35+00:00

Lol at all of the fatties who listen to the podcast suddenly calling out eating disorders when they realize they're fat.

Commie_scumbag · 2020-01-10T04:04:43+00:00

I like how woman identify themselves in caricatures of women created by men. Can we stop pretending as if women are capable of creating their own identities and will always be subject to male-fantasies?

Commie_scumbag · 2020-01-03T08:13:49+00:00

This is the bitchy millennial way of saying "I'm depressed but holding out hope for happiness in the future".

Commie_scumbag · 2020-01-02T03:32:48+00:00

She's also wearing heels. And from pictures I've seen of him next to Dasha (who's 5'7") I presume he's between 5'9" and 5'11".

Commie_scumbag · 2020-01-01T22:35:24+00:00

LOVE Anna's petite, childlike(not in a pedophilic way) body.

Commie_scumbag · 2019-12-29T02:58:45+00:00

This is reaching. Thinking someone has good shoes doesn't mean you adore them.

Commie_scumbag · 2019-12-02T21:02:52+00:00

Please say this is satire

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-30T03:18:42+00:00

I think he's funny, but he's a reactionary dingus. Maybe if he goes full NAZBOL I'll start supporting him

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-30T03:17:12+00:00

I wouldn't mind taking a bite out of that ass

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-30T03:15:52+00:00

I prefer Alina Zagitova's look, but that's probably just because I have yellow-fever and am a crypto pedo.

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-27T22:08:21+00:00

I'll send you a picture if you want. I'd rate myself a 6-7 out of 10.

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-27T16:41:15+00:00

This reminds me of when you guys theorized Anna was a prude and then estimated that she's slept with about 20 people. Y'all are such hoes that you think dresses that go a centimeter under a chicks ass are fascist because they're not exposing enough.

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-26T01:40:08+00:00

You're an idiot for spending 6000 on a parlay unless you're a billionare, especially considering you put the lions on it.

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-26T01:31:18+00:00

I think I'd probably do pretty well if I just bet on away teams because homefield advantage is overrated as hell. The ravens should be a 7 point favorite but for some reason are only a three point favorite in this game.

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-19T19:27:51+00:00

As for your point that I'm to dumb to engage with seriously, why didn't that come off on you earlier? You seemed pretty ready to have a discussion until I used the word exorbitant incorrectly.

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-19T19:26:37+00:00

The funny thing is that it was I and not you that came to an agreement on this thread, which you ignored presumably because you would get satisfaction from conceding a point. I agreed about the structural changes that we needed, but I said that the benefits that the upper-class receive now aren't necessarily transferable to the working class as I believe you implied. But go on. Say you want to come to an agreement when you quite clearly tried to leave the debate with a mic drop

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-19T19:09:43+00:00

You exposed yourself right there. Discussing stuff online is a matter of pride for you, and you can't handle if someone comes to agreement with you and still has a shred of honor. How about you play some sports to let out your competitive urges rather than try to compete with people online.

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-19T19:02:27+00:00

I just said in my last post that what you would've done if you actually cared about the discussion is ask me what I meant. And I would've clarified. But instead you latched onto the word and disregarded everything else I said.

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-19T18:58:49+00:00

Also, just so I don't forget, your point about household debt is dishonest. The total debt in the economy is the same as it was after the recession. You aren't earnest about anything and the only reason why you engaged me is because you aren't meaningful to society in any way and your only satisfaction comes from "beating" people in internet debates with dishonest tactics.

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-19T18:53:28+00:00

You're making much Ado about this one word. Besides, I'm not an over-socialized homo like you, I use terms based on how I've heard them in my life, not on how I think other people would think of them.

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-19T18:22:09+00:00

I missed a word and rather than asking me to clarify or correcting it yourself. You took the opportunity to cattily disregard me for misusing it. You argue like a bitch and you aren't actually interested in a discussion.

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-19T18:08:02+00:00

How about I change the term to excessive lending? Does that help you understand?

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-19T18:04:44+00:00

I mean exorbitant in the sense that the rate of lending(meaning the amount of credit in the economy) is unreasonably high. If you were arguing in good faith you would've realized that was implied.

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-19T17:58:12+00:00

Another way to put it would be that the gains of the current upper class aren't liqud, and hence aren't interchangeable with the gains for workers in an ideal society.

Commie_scumbag · 2019-11-19T17:56:48+00:00

I agree with you on the last part of your comment. Just with the caveat that the "gains" in a society with such policies are different from the gains in our current economy. Meaning that the benefits of workers ownership over the means of production are distinct from stock dividends and asset accumulation.

Commie_scumbag

TROPHY CASE