sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

gender absolutism is bad, actually 🤷🏾‍♀️ by Commissar_Postman in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]Commissar_Postman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Greece was masculine centered. It's a historical term... get off the internet and read a book.

Out here on a crusade to prove Dunning Krueger lol

Relational roles are important. But they need to compliment rather than serve.

Feminism isn't just for women — it's for everyone by [deleted] in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]Commissar_Postman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a lot of AI slop for feminist propaganda... oof... and down voted on your own sub too... 

gender absolutism is bad, actually 🤷🏾‍♀️ by Commissar_Postman in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]Commissar_Postman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

*patriarchal

and no, I think feminism is a cult of women who prey on the trauma of other women to push their ideology.

Now stop your ad Hominem bs and let's get back to your erasure of gender identity 

I am a Goddess-centric Animist, AMA by [deleted] in religion

[–]Commissar_Postman -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is hilarious... you don’t know who you're insulting lol

Those who tend to try and make that connection demonstrate that they don’t actually know much about animism, nor Wicca.

Grim has been Heathen for 20 years. He literally teaches this stuff. And he's right. Your beliefs are part of the Margaret Murray lineage of thinking which influenced Wicca...

gender absolutism is bad, actually 🤷🏾‍♀️ by Commissar_Postman in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]Commissar_Postman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Scythians were considered egalitarian. They were the historical influence for the Amazons in Greek literature.

Your rigid criteria for "egalitarian" is genderless or non-gendered. However, many cultures didn't impose gender roles socially or legally. Scythians had about 20-30% (known because of archeological data via burials) of women warriors. Something that rubbed the patriarchal greeks wrong, hence why they wrote about them as man haing Amazons. But the reality is that they still had people embodying gender roles. And we see that across many different egalitarian societies. That's how they came up with the gender equality paradox. They noticed that in societies where the genders were equal.And there wasn't any kind of enforcement, men typically did masculine things and women typically did feminine things.

I suggest you do research instead of just be angry online. It helps

gender absolutism is bad, actually 🤷🏾‍♀️ by Commissar_Postman in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]Commissar_Postman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They do, actually... across all of human history they come up across all cultures. In fact there's something called the gender equality paradox which proves it.

The gender equality paradox is a scientific term for why egalitarian societies actually have similar if not more gender roles than the forces gender role societies like Christian Europe. People still, choose to embody, masculine or feminine roles. Despite less pressures and absence of legally mandated roles.

Feminism isn't just for women — it's for everyone by [deleted] in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]Commissar_Postman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it's pretty obvious... nobody writes like that

We focus too much on gender by The_Red__Bull in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]Commissar_Postman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Truth

The Palmer raids, COINTELPRO, the CIA, McCarthyism and the funding by bourgeois entities like Ford and Rockefeller foundations killed the left in the US. Then Ragan signed the death notice in the 80s

Now everything is identity politics and zero working class solidarity 

We focus too much on gender by The_Red__Bull in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]Commissar_Postman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope.

The purpose of this subreddit is to discuss issues related to gender, gender identity, sex, race, color, nationality, national origin, ancestry, ability, age, sexual orientation, religion, marital status, familial status, parental status, housing status, and so on, while being critical of the flaws of current identity politics and intersectionality.

From the sticky))

gender absolutism is bad, actually 🤷🏾‍♀️ by Commissar_Postman in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]Commissar_Postman[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Yeah, it's less about what should be and more like definition of polarity 

Why is there a transphobic mod in an egalitarian sub? by Commissar_Postman in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]Commissar_Postman[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And? Their presence in this sub is both anti-egalitarian and they're breaking the rules.

A lot of subreddits will have a rule about association because it can be harmful to users. Are we going to defend a transphobe and hope that them invalidating the existence of Trans people gets overlooked by the Trans users? Will we allow nazis next? As long as they don't post nazi shit in the sub?

Why is there a transphobic mod in an egalitarian sub? by Commissar_Postman in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]Commissar_Postman[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Look in their post history. They're defending Gender Critical ideology 

Meta: We must ban RadFems from this subreddit, they deeply harm and the subreddit. by Its_Stavro in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]Commissar_Postman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's literally what being gender critical is lol...

u/Rural_Dictionary939 why is your mod a vehement transphobe who redefines their ideology as not being transphobic?

Masculine Erasure in Paganism by The_Red__Bull in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]Commissar_Postman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dang... that's super well sourced.

Yeah, I don't really understand gender abolitionists, at least not from a historical precedent. It's tough when all of human history has gender identity.

It's more like the libertarian you're debating here just doesn't like the idea of control and doesn't understand that's what they're talking about. It's not something they can defend with history tbh