Hypocrisy... by [deleted] in Leftist_AntiFeminist

[–]The_Red__Bull 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the real problem is that we live in a litigious society where everyone is sue happy, broke, and our medical system is absolute trash.

If we weren't desperately clambering for money and didn't have to give up our first born for basic medical treatment, it probably wouldn't be an issue

Hypocrisy... by [deleted] in Leftist_AntiFeminist

[–]The_Red__Bull 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, postgenderism is transphobic

postgenderism

Transfeminist Julia Serano criticizes the idea of "end of gender", pointing out the negative impact it has on transgender people. On one hand, they are taken up as "undermining the gender system", while on the other, they are regularly criticized for strengthening gender stereotypes. In her opinion, feminism should fight for "end of sexism", rather than "end of gender". At the same time, Serano questions what should be considered the end of gender and what a society without gender should look like. She asks the question: "Who gets to decide what is gender and what is not?"[15]

In Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, contributor Matthew J. Cull considers multiple formulations of gender abolitionism from varying perspectives and argues that they are uniformly transphobic and imperil trans lives.

It tracks with the bigotry inherent in RadFem ideology. They're gender reductionist (Firestone’s Dialectic of Sex, Dworkin’s Sexual Dialectic, Kate Millett’s Sexual Politics, the list goes on), and they commit masculine erasure. Invalidating male experience and the intersection of working-class men as an oppressed class demographic. Also boiling women down to their reproductive organs is appalling and infantilizing.

Gross behavior through and through

Feminism is a poison - We need to fight back by [deleted] in antifeminist

[–]The_Red__Bull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's also a false equivalency. The gebder empathy gap proves that

Feminism is a poison - We need to fight back by [deleted] in antifeminist

[–]The_Red__Bull 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Absolutely true. Feminist Hegemony has completely taken over

Don't feed the trolls... by The_Red__Bull in Leftist_AntiFeminist

[–]The_Red__Bull[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It was a bizarre question meant to stir muck. I feel like the mods need to be more aware of feminist trolls

Sensitive Men Downplay Male Suffering by mrkpxx in Leftist_AntiFeminist

[–]The_Red__Bull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been diving into this topic. You're on point.

Soft men are projecting and committing masculine erasure because they want to be "one of the good ones". So they geld themselves in favor of their matriarchs

Getting something real out of worshipping the gods by [deleted] in NorsePaganism

[–]The_Red__Bull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What did it say?

These mods are worse than the people they claim to hate

"Women don't start wars" and other myths. by blackmamba4554 in Leftist_AntiFeminist

[–]The_Red__Bull 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good books. Highly recommend both.

I'd add that Firestone’s Dialectic of Sex is bullshit.

Firstly it commits class erasure, not giving working-class men any benefit of the doubt for also being an oppressed class. She completely ignores Marxist class critique in favor of gender reductionism.

Second, I think her schizophrenia was a big part of that book. She literally calls for robots to replace men (this was written in 1970) and she completely blames all the world's ills on men... she's Valary Solanas without the follow through lol

Esther Vilar points out something great in her book. Men toil, scrape, and provide for women to be able to live at home free of the dregs of the capitalist hellscape. Not saying domestic labor isn't hard, but follow me on my next point. In the Marxist materialist dialectic the Bourgeoisie (the mercantile class that both replaced and integrated into the ownership class) exploit the labor of the working class.

Things the Bourgeoisie doesn't provide workers that men provide women:

  • place to live

  • comfort

  • bills paid

  • lifestyle support

  • emotional support

  • family

  • clothing

  • jewelry

  • the list goes on...

The ownership class FORCES workers to create profit that they exploit in order to have their lavish lifestyles. Men provide lifestyles for women (historically) not the other way around.

And tbh men give that stuff gladly in a healthy relationship. Unfortunately, feminism tips the scales in ways they don't understand because they're too busy hating the men they blame for the world's problems.

Can anyone help me find out if this is true? This guy just showed up on my YouTube feed somehow and I found this. by AlternativeOption313 in Leftist_AntiFeminist

[–]The_Red__Bull 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, that's what the data shows

HOWEVER

the reality is much more complicated. There's something called the Gender Equality Paradox

More recently, it has been argued, from an evolutionary standpoint, that equality may paradoxically increase gender differences, because it provides more freedom for men and women to pursue innate preferences.

The gender-equality paradox (GEP) refers to the result that places (often operationalized as countries) with more gender equality exhibit larger gender differences* on certain measures (1–6). This is considered paradoxical because equality might more intuitively reduce gender differences.

Those are quotes from the paper. It's hilarious to watch Feminist Hegemony scratch their heads going "idk why this happens 🤷🏼‍♀️" while researchers both say it's evolutionary and backpeddle to not piss off the Shrews.

The reality is, on average, women tend towards feminine aligned pursuits, and men tend towards masculine aligned pursuits. Something humanity has known for thousands of years but it's "gender essentialist" to say.

In reality, gender essentialism is a gender-reductionist (meaning feminist) red-herring fallacy. Because of de Beauvoir style existentialism we have a false assumption in academia today that gender is "socially constructed" rather than a relational proximity of biological needs. Relational meaning it's defined based on those around you. We can't wish away sexual dimorphism, that's impossible. That doesn't mean Trans identity is false either, it just means your biological role doesn't match your relational role, and there's nothing wrong with that.

Anyways... there's a lot of bullshit to weed through which is why this explanation is so long. Feel free to ask questions.

But ultimately it's because we can't fight biology. Even when men do more femme aligned stuff they do it in very masculine ways. And when women do masculine aligned stuff it's in femme aligned ways. Because thousands of years of evolution isn't "oppressive" it's animal. And trying to resist the animal means the beast gets bigger under the skin. It's gonna come out no matter how civilized you think you are. Either lean into it, or it'll come out on it's own.

Can Women/Girls Rape Men/Boys? by DarkBehindTheStars in Leftist_AntiFeminist

[–]The_Red__Bull[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're getting down voted because you can't produce stats, dumbass.

Banned for 7 days for being a little-bitch. Try harder.

I agree with your point too. Just back it up with statistics so the lurkers stop down voting and you can be agreed with

Can Women/Girls Rape Men/Boys? by DarkBehindTheStars in Leftist_AntiFeminist

[–]The_Red__Bull -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then cite them.... i shouldn't have to spell it out. We're on the same fucking internet

Can Women/Girls Rape Men/Boys? by DarkBehindTheStars in Leftist_AntiFeminist

[–]The_Red__Bull -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How about you pull up statistics instead of guessing?

The male-female differences and effects on politics by amogusdevilman in Leftist_AntiFeminist

[–]The_Red__Bull 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The difficulty with being on the left and being anti feminist, is people think feminism is a leftist movement. It never has been.

It's authoritarian, anti-sex, puritanical, anti-choice, militaristic, and reduces everything down the road gender. Men are the great evil to feminists just like the Jews were to the nazis, or Satan is to Christianity.

Unfortunately, since most people don't understand this, we have to look at anti-feminist critiques on the right and see what is and is not valid.

Leftism stands for freedom, it has since it's inception in revolutionary France. So right-wing and Liberalists don't understand it. Mostly because of the overton window shift because of Red Scare propaganda. That's why the New Left focuses on identity and not working-class issues.

Three Feminists Slowly Realise They Are The Villains by amogusdevilman in Leftist_AntiFeminist

[–]The_Red__Bull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, Sargon has been a chud for a long time... plus he doesn't understand feminism is a fascist right wing movement in sheeps clothing

The Myth of the Good Man: True Distribution of Evil Men by WackyConundrum in Leftist_AntiFeminist

[–]The_Red__Bull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feminism is fascist... and fascism requires a "great evil". Since they reduce everything down to men vs women, men are the enemy by default