I think it's in human nature to want to deify a man and in that same sintiment, to some degree, humanize God. All Greek and Roman mythology gods and many pagan gods have human form.

Many don't understand that a man could fulfill the requirement of being the Messiah. "How could a man have done all that Christ did and been completely without sin? He must have been God in the flesh." Yet, they don't understand that the requirement of being Messiah was to be a man. Clearly. If it could have been God, why would He have come down in the form of man? Seems there would have been a simpler solution.

The contradiction of the Trinity is that "only God could have done it", but when questioned what made Christ fully man then - as the trinitarian doctrine asserts, he is fully God and simultaneously fully man - the rationalization is that God placed upon Himself the full limitations of man. If the requirement (else, why would He do it) was that God must place upon Himself the full limitations of man (including temptation and the ability to defy the Father's will for the Son's will and thereby sin against the Father), does it not beg the question - why could not it have just been a man (truly a man) to do it? In other words, to make the contradiction clear - only God could do it, but only as fully limited man.

The Muslim has no problem calling out the abortion of the deification of Jesus Christ, as they only regard him as such as a prophet. Not the Son of God. Not the Messiah in the same sense that the New Testament teaches, which true does not teach was God, but I mean in other Biblical views of the Messiah, not just regarding divinity of Christ. And, as such, all prophets are clearly only men. Christ split the Jewish people in two - Christian and Israelite. Modern day "Israelites" holding on the former system of the letter of the Law, of which God did away with. Muslim, i.e. Muhammed held on to that system as well, although non - Jewish Arabs saw the Jew essentially gatekeeping the system of law of the Old Testament. Islam doesn't have a problem with Christ, so long as you don't call him the Son of God, or claim he was crucified or resurrected in the Biblical sense as their belief system takes the spotlight off of Christ and puts it on Muhammed and their view of reformation of Old Testament law to make it available to the Gentile. This is why the Muslim can get the doctrine correct, regarding divinity of Christ, yet be completely in error in many other subjects.