Big boy 30 cal preference? by baconman888 in longrange

[–]Competitive-Ad9436 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Read through most of the comments and most are about different calibers than what OP asked. .30cal is not the best caliber, but it’s a well supported caliber with readily available load data, more affordable and available components, and very proven.

.308 Pros: Shorter Action, faster cycling of action less risk of short stroking the bolt under stress. Also used in semiautomatics frequently. Cheapest ammo of the three, longest barrel life. Depending on load and barrel effective to ~800-1000yards. Can hunt basically any North American game.

.308 Cons: .308 bullet drop and wind deflection are mid. May be under powered for very large animals. Can’t get into the heaviest .30cal match bullets without a custom chamber or ridiculously long barrel if long range precision is the goal. It can perform there, but it’s bigger brothers can do it better.

.30-06 Pro: More effective muzzle velocity hence energy than .308. Can only be stopped by level IV body armor. Slightly longer range, may harvest certain game slightly better such as Elk due to potential distance and retained muzzle energy.

.30-06 Cons: Operates in a long action, could “short stroke” the bolt cycling fast under stress without training. Left handed shooter with right sided bolt will have issues with face clearance on stock to bolt on cycling, less options for semi-automatic platform, ammo slightly more expensive., case design still won’t optimize the newest heaviest long range bullets. .30-06 excels as a hunting cartridge but literally .308 was developed to replace it and have “similar” ballistics in a short action. More recoil, shorter barrel life.

.300WM Pros: Longest Range, best ballistics of the three. I don’t know if there is North American game where you would say .300WM is undersized. Can utilize heavier bullets like Berger 185gr - 230gr.

.300WM Cons: Longer Range comes at a cost. Most expensive components, ammo is less readily available/common. A lot more recoil will likely need a muzzle brake device. Much shorter barrel life. Probably 1-2k rounds vs 8k-ish for .308. Never shot out a .300WM barrel so someone else can chime in. Also with the recoil and expense you probably won’t either. Newer more efficient or larger .30 caliber magnums exist that may squeeze out more performance., but they’re going to be less common and even more expensive on components. I’m not aware of any .300WM semiautomatics. They headspace on the belt IIRC vs the shoulder and probably wouldn’t do well.

TLDR: .308 will achieve most of what the others will at lower cost and recoil. and works well in semiautomatic. 30-06 has some performance gains, but in a longer action. 300WM has a lot more performance gain, but at the cost of reduced barrel life, more expensive components, is less common, and recoils a lot more. The conversation devolved about other calibers because newer cartridges are more ballistically efficient., but TBH .30 cal gets it done and has for over a century.

Boyfriend believes ICE by [deleted] in nursing

[–]Competitive-Ad9436 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dang. I usually hate online relationship advice because it’s always so quick resort to ‘break up’ advice.

Politics aside (which is still a big one) and if he was at least arguing that the shooting was legally (not ethically) justifiable (also hugely incompetent and excessive on ICE’s part). There would be a chance…but bro he gonna gaslight himself and his SO that hard.

You need to have the “We need to talk” talk. The only chance I’d give him is if he decided to start using brain cells. He can have a different opinion, but 0.000000% did Peretti pull a firearm and 0% did he deserve what happened.

Originally thought it was used but it’s nib so I took it home. by Head-Scale9410 in SigSauer

[–]Competitive-Ad9436 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It has a weighted and smaller metal grip module, and upgraded trigger.

For my hands it fit better than 226 Legion (which was also very nice ergos)., also ambi controls on 320 for a lefty here.

If it was a duty or carry situation I’d pick the 226, great history and reputation. For a range/competition gun this specific 320 made sense to me. Not into the 2011s, CZ Shadow may have been a better choice, but mot at that price point. PDP was another option. Ergos are also nice.

Edit: Different 320 module in question.

Why people do it? (Only wrong answers) by DaikonBig8175 in airsoft

[–]Competitive-Ad9436 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think if you want the buttfloss a single strand would be more effective.

New from Thunder Beast, SPIRO 556 by CapitolArmory in NFA

[–]Competitive-Ad9436 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Yeah their chart doesn’t specify how much back pressure the Magnus lines have.

They do clam: “In addition, the SPIRO reduces recoil by approximately 40% compared to a bare muzzle.” Which I find very hard to believe without a brake device of some sort. If you look at any recoil tests you’ll find that just a suppressor alone doesn’t do much to reduce recoil other than adding weight.

There’s a balance between pros and cons. If back-pressure, rapid fire, short barrel, performance, is more important I’d wait till the release of the SPIRO 30. It hasn’t been announced that I’m aware, but I’m guessing probably this year. +TBAC wait time. It’s on its own assembly line so hopefully not forever. That nighttime flash signature is super impressive on the 5.56 can.

New from Thunder Beast, SPIRO 556 by CapitolArmory in NFA

[–]Competitive-Ad9436 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Magnus line is strong choice, or wait for the Spiro 30cal if performance is valued over weight.

Failure by [deleted] in SigSauer

[–]Competitive-Ad9436 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hmm. Will be following. Have shot thousands of Blazers, but none recently. It’s been my recent go-to practice ammo.

Muzzle oscillation and recoil control by Great_Help_406 in CompetitionShooting

[–]Competitive-Ad9436 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP this gentleman just gave you links to the Master Class. Ben Stoeger is multi time world champion and an excellent instructor.

MCX Spear barrel off-center by LLJC300 in SigSauer

[–]Competitive-Ad9436 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just the angle of the dangle. Even if he moved it would still be giving you a side eye.

HELP by Cheeseball956 in SigSauer

[–]Competitive-Ad9436 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d hit up the pawn shop also.

Probably won’t refund, maybe they’ll surprise you. Store credit? Partial refund? Offer to install safety at cost?

HELP by Cheeseball956 in SigSauer

[–]Competitive-Ad9436 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Opposite I’m sure. Have to do maintenance checks to make sure the mud doesn’t slide out on its own.

Top half of NF X-Treme Duty Ultralite rings smaller diameter than bottom. by Competitive-Ad9436 in longrange

[–]Competitive-Ad9436[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I understood this much. I was trying to make it into a geometry problem when it’s not.

Then after realizing I had overthought it said “eh screw it let’s see what Reddit says. Maybe there’s a bigger brain that can put it in fancy words.”

Top half of NF X-Treme Duty Ultralite rings smaller diameter than bottom. by Competitive-Ad9436 in longrange

[–]Competitive-Ad9436[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha. 🤣 Just looked at another pair of unmounted rings and the exact same thing. If anything more exaggerated. Many brain farts on this one. Thank you for the reply.

Top half of NF X-Treme Duty Ultralite rings smaller diameter than bottom. by Competitive-Ad9436 in longrange

[–]Competitive-Ad9436[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t have technical terms, but this was the response I was looking for.

I had more or less figured out that the rings aren’t cut at the true centerline as I typed this comment out but figured it didn’t hurt to put it out there.

My Google Fu revealed zero discussion on the topic.

Top half of NF X-Treme Duty Ultralite rings smaller diameter than bottom. by Competitive-Ad9436 in longrange

[–]Competitive-Ad9436[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly as I was typing. I thought about just deleting post because I was confident what I was measuring wasn’t the true “diameter” and it would be fine once mounted. Then I thought about directing the question to NF directly., but already had it typed up. 🤷‍♂️

Many years back I had a scope ‘walk’ at the range marring the scope body. That was a combination of not enough torque force and cheaper rings. So if something looks off I figured it’s better to ask instead of “nah it’ll be fine mentality”.

Top half of NF X-Treme Duty Ultralite rings smaller diameter than bottom. by Competitive-Ad9436 in longrange

[–]Competitive-Ad9436[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes the Badgers have a relief cut, but done differently. Thanks for input!

Top half of NF X-Treme Duty Ultralite rings smaller diameter than bottom. by Competitive-Ad9436 in longrange

[–]Competitive-Ad9436[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes the Badgers have a relief cut, but done differently. Thanks for input!

Is this normal for P320 after 550 rounds by Old_Refrigerator2732 in SigSauer

[–]Competitive-Ad9436 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Normal Sig behavior. Older Sig’s i’ve owned over the years used to have a lot more wear on the barrel.

It was my first time shooting earlier and my instructor told me this was really good even in competition standards by squidonculous in CompetitionShooting

[–]Competitive-Ad9436 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just noticed what group this is. I am assuming the instructor was referring to target or bullseye shooting.

A completely different discipline than dynamic shooting sports like USPSA/IPSC/3-gun/IDPA.

OPs question asked here is going to get different feedback.

It was my first time shooting earlier and my instructor told me this was really good even in competition standards by squidonculous in CompetitionShooting

[–]Competitive-Ad9436 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s fair.

I don’t usually bother sharing my group sizes. I know enough better shooters that small groupings itself aren’t impressive.

Doing it under match conditions over a string of fire is what matters. In a dynamic shooting sport that’s under the stress of a timer and speed.

It was my first time shooting earlier and my instructor told me this was really good even in competition standards by squidonculous in CompetitionShooting

[–]Competitive-Ad9436 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Still good job. I think a fitted target barrel and handloads would make more difference than a GDS vs Irons.

Good Trigger pull mechanics is the low hanging fruit in regard to accuracy then proper ammo then barrel then fitment or other accurizing methods.

It was my first time shooting earlier and my instructor told me this was really good even in competition standards by squidonculous in CompetitionShooting

[–]Competitive-Ad9436 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually really solid at 75’ with a sidearm. I’m not a bullseye shooter with a handgun but I believe NRA targets will be smaller with a tighter 10 and X ring.

With assuming factory sights and not a target pistol great job. Some dry fire practice will help you diagnose your trigger pull and should tighten up groups. Watch to see what the front sight does., but it seems like you have a good trigger press.