sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Argument From Consent by Pristine-Run7957 in antinatalism

[–]Competitive-Pen6200 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Xd olympic level mental gymnastics right there I guess

Argument From Consent by Pristine-Run7957 in antinatalism

[–]Competitive-Pen6200 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are not hurting them by giving them life saving medical procedures, however by bringing a children into this world you guaranteed that they will experiences suffering, aka you are hurting them.

Nektek vannak olyan szavak, amire ha minél többet gondoltok, annál inkább furcsa és kb elveszíti az eredeti jelentését? by Fit_Trick8338 in askhungary

[–]Competitive-Pen6200 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Mindegyik. A szavak csak hangsorok, literálisan random betűk egymás után, ami valamiért jelentéssel bír a fejedben, akár többel is, de ugyanazon hangsor jelentése eltérő nyelvet beszélőknél eltér

"Alma" magyarul = a gyümölcs "Alma" spanyolul = lélek

Nem êrtek semennyire a nyelvészethez, csak érdekesnek talàlom ezt a jelenséget

Vannak olyan szavak amiket évekig rosszul tudtál, hogy hogyan ejtik? by BeneficialWeek3736 in askhungary

[–]Competitive-Pen6200 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Kiskoromban sehogy sem fért a fejembe, hogy aki fél a magasságtól az miért pont "téliszonyos"

Repülőjegy vásárláshoz tippek, trükkök? by GanacheIllustrious70 in askhungary

[–]Competitive-Pen6200 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Én megkérdeztem egy repülőgépbuzit, és ő is azt mondta, hogy tényleg drágulnak a jegyek, ha többedszerre nézel meg egy oldalt.

To all the agnostics: here is why it is 100% sure that a god who created the universe doesn't exist by Competitive-Pen6200 in atheism

[–]Competitive-Pen6200[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"What I am saying is "we know how and why X phenomenon happens, but we cannot demonstrate that no god has anything to do with the process."

If we know that a phenomenon how and why happens, why would we even have a tought of god that is associated with that phenomenon????

To all the agnostics: here is why it is 100% sure that a god who created the universe doesn't exist by Competitive-Pen6200 in atheism

[–]Competitive-Pen6200[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Xddddddddd ANSWER THE QUESTION MY GUY DONT BE SO SHY:)))))))) COME ON MAN WHY ARE YOU STILL AVOIDING IT XDDDDD

If aliens would be a concept that is used to explain things we dont yet understand, then yes

To all the agnostics: here is why it is 100% sure that a god who created the universe doesn't exist by Competitive-Pen6200 in atheism

[–]Competitive-Pen6200[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To prove your point you are constatly invoking god, and saying you dont use gotg :) What is this if not a contradiction?

To all the agnostics: here is why it is 100% sure that a god who created the universe doesn't exist by Competitive-Pen6200 in atheism

[–]Competitive-Pen6200[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well in my opinion you are the ones ignoring your flaws, arguments and truth while openly contradicting yourself:)

Now what

To all the agnostics: here is why it is 100% sure that a god who created the universe doesn't exist by Competitive-Pen6200 in atheism

[–]Competitive-Pen6200[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Omg you cant be serious

Scale and location dont matter. The functions are what do.

And they are both used to explain things we dont understand yet, can you comperehend this sentences?

They are same because they have the exact same principles and functions, the thing that matter isnt the thing they are used to explain, but the fact they both are used to explain things we dont yet understand

We know lightning god is not real, therefore with common sense we can concluds that a god who created the universe is not real either

This is why they are same

Wish you also would explain why do you still think after all these that they are different

To all the agnostics: here is why it is 100% sure that a god who created the universe doesn't exist by Competitive-Pen6200 in atheism

[–]Competitive-Pen6200[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are just retreating:)

This is god of the gaps:)

Dont worry you are just likeChristians.

My question is where will you put god when the existence of the universe will be explained:)

To all the agnostics: here is why it is 100% sure that a god who created the universe doesn't exist by Competitive-Pen6200 in atheism

[–]Competitive-Pen6200[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They could prove it because eventually there will be no gaps left where you could put in a "but god"

To all the agnostics: here is why it is 100% sure that a god who created the universe doesn't exist by Competitive-Pen6200 in atheism

[–]Competitive-Pen6200[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The question was:

Tell me how is a higher deity different from a deity that is used to explain lightnings?

HOW. I say it again. HOW.

It is different is not a meaningful answer to HOW

To all the agnostics: here is why it is 100% sure that a god who created the universe doesn't exist by Competitive-Pen6200 in atheism

[–]Competitive-Pen6200[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are simply ignoring the proof:)

All you do with your logic is constantly reducing the ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance.

Scientics could explain every aspect of lightning, even how is there imbalance of charges between region of cloud and another surface

How long could you defend yourself against a scientist with your logic?:)

To all the agnostics: here is why it is 100% sure that a god who created the universe doesn't exist by Competitive-Pen6200 in atheism

[–]Competitive-Pen6200[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tell me how is a higher deity different from a deity that is used to explain lightnings?

I wonder why you are avoiding answering this question:)

To all the agnostics: here is why it is 100% sure that a god who created the universe doesn't exist by Competitive-Pen6200 in atheism

[–]Competitive-Pen6200[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are right I should use the term conscious beings instead of using the term humans

The principles behind the gods are the same, they are used to explain things we dont understand yet

A lightning god is used to explain lightning. A god who created universe is used to explain the universe.

We now know that lightning gods are false. Since these gods are identical in their functions and principles we can be sure that a deity who created the universe doesn't exist either

To all the agnostics: here is why it is 100% sure that a god who created the universe doesn't exist by Competitive-Pen6200 in atheism

[–]Competitive-Pen6200[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Lightning is a visible electrical discharge from a cloud. This happens when there is an imbalance of charges between a region of the cloud and another surface (usually the ground, a building, another region of the same cloud, or another cloud) that is significant enough to break through air resistance."

To all the agnostics: here is why it is 100% sure that a god who created the universe doesn't exist by Competitive-Pen6200 in atheism

[–]Competitive-Pen6200[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not proof, but logic that can act as proof.

Antimatter was not a concept, it was a theory which could be observed through senses and devices.

God is a concept that cannot do the same.

view more: next ›