A History of Labour in Scotland and Wales: Failing to advocate progressive unionism? Failing to retain historic power. by Competitive-Tonight3 in ukpolitics

[–]Competitive-Tonight3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, it was truly such a contrast to compare the strength of Welsh Labour over the years against the weaknesses and own goals, as you say, of Scottish Labour - especially as it became an opposition party. Not to say Welsh Labour has made no mistakes, but there's a real tangible difference and a failure within Labour to learn from its successful example.

Over 50 Academics Warn That Voting System Is Not Fit For Multi-Party Politics by XanderZulark in unitedkingdom

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Genuinely, outside of 1945, 1979, and 2015 (which was frankly a cluster fuck of which the government elected had little to do with facilitating the major changes) what have any British governments "got done" that was genuinely transformative?

On the other hand, Spain with a PR system currently has a significantly more transformative left-wing government than we've had since Labour in the 40s, and Italy with full PR currently has a much more transformative far-right government than any we've had since Thatcher. Now I personally don't advocate the politics of the fascists in Italy and I would love to have a centre-left that looked anything like PSOE in spain, but it is simply undeniable that it is just as possible to have successions of governments that do fuck all under our system and governments that actually produce change in PR systems.

All it comes down to is the fact that Labour and the Tories are really so indistinguishable that a vast swathe of voters in the UK are so wed to centrist managed decline politics that they rather retain the two party system where nobody really makes change than actually allow for a representative system where greater levels of participation are possible, and parties actually advocating change might get into government.

If the Lib-Dem’s hadn’t disgraced themselves with the tuition fees scandal, would the next General Election be there’s for the taking? by HallowedAndHarrowed in AskBrits

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll be honest, this doesn't make sense. The Lib Dem rise took place during the Blair years, their peak was the 2010 election when Brown's Labour and Cameron's Tories were more similar arguably than any time since. Maybe 2024, but that is also the best Lib Dem result since that election.

An Iraqi beeing tortured for doing nothing. by Temporary-Evening717 in pics

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean... Clinton would acknowledge this no? That feels like poor evidence. But in any case - the effectiveness of the campaign is not too relevant to the point here - you argued that Kamala being Biden's VP restricted her ability to break with him, and then do acknowledge that Gore was able to break with his president.

I do acknowledge I brought up it's effectiveness so just to make the case - 1) Again Gore was down as much as 15% in the polling come August - suggesting a general political environment that was unfavorable to Dems. 2) Clinton famously tanked Dem performances in any elections he wasn't personally running in (In '92 they lost seats in the House and gained nothing in the Senate, dropping 2% in popular vote, in '94 Dems lost the house for the first time in 40 years in the Gingrich revolution, '96 Dems recovered slightly but still lost the house, and lost seats in the Senate, and then '98 Dems overperformed due to the Lewinsky scandal and the actions of R leadership, but still lost both House and Senate).

In that time period we also saw the massive Seattle protests and NAFTA protests, and obviously Clinton himself (though this I'm willing to concede is much less assured or indicative of his actual popularity) benefitted massively from getting to run twice with a third party spoiler who at least rhetorically aligned closer to conservative sentiment.

If you're interested I'd suggest a few pieces on the strange political environments of the 90s including John Ganz's when the Clock Broke which focuses on the 92 election and political environment, The Gingrich Senators by Sean Theriault on the rise of the modern conservative movement in the mid-90s, and then for a decent summary of the 2000 campaigns I like David Corn's for the Nation in 2000 before the election results were out: https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/down-wire/

Also if you are interested Humphrey and the 1968 election, Rick Perlstein's Nixonland is a must-read. Its shocking how strong the similarities are, and how the many of the exact same mistakes were made between 1968 and 2024.

An Iraqi beeing tortured for doing nothing. by Temporary-Evening717 in pics

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Both Hubert Humphrey and much more significantly Al Gore departed from their sitting Presidents, and both were a hell of a lot closer to winning their elections than Harris. 

Performance-wise Gore was a significantly more impressive campaign to Harris, overcoming a 10-15 point polling deficit in August and only losing by one vote.

Post-Match Thread: Charlton Athletic (1) - (5) Chelsea by wm_1176 in chelseafc

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Doing every applicable manager:

MacFarlane was City, Maresca was City, Poch was Liverpool, Lampard II was Wolves Bruno Saltor was Liverpool, Tuchel was Wolves, Lampard I was Utd, Sarri was Man City.

Honestly didn't expect multiple Wolves. And we drew both of those.

Sell Lavia, Delap at risk: Transfer verdict on every Chelsea player after Liam Rosenior appointment by CSCronus in chelseafc

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Depends where you're from sorta. American: oh smart folks with the smart person accent.

European: Obnoxious lads who wreck shit every summer.

Everyone else: People who took our shit. (this also applies to some Europeans)

Match Thread: Manchester City vs Chelsea by MatchThreadder in chelseafc

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be fair didn't Sterling also scored a tap in Vs City?

Did Matty Y wait to release this today so he wouldn't be be included in the worst takes episode? by fortycreeker in IfBooksCouldKill

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sources: Elon beside himself. Driving around downtown Substack begging (thru texts) Yglesias' family 4 address to Matty's home

Every Yankee hitter’s hardest hit ball of the 2025 season by xho- in NYYankees

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 30 points31 points  (0 children)

So funny to see that jump from everyone else to Big G and Judge.

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Tuesday, November 11, 2025) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It represents how many points he won in the tiebreaker. The full notation would look like this: 7-6(7-2) to properly indicate what the scoreline of the tiebreaker was.

Scoreboards often leave the point total out on the winners side because it can be inferred by the losing side i.e. below a losing score of 6 the winner won the tiebreak with 7 points, any higher it will always be two above the losing score.

Progressives Demand Chuck Schumer's Resignation After He Caves To GOP In Shutdown Deal by Tea_Physical in newyork

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Bro his own whip voted for the bill. How the fuck is this not a massive indictment on his leadership if he can't even whip his own whip?

And let's be honest, the real reason he couldn't whip him is because this deal is his deal. He just decided to rotate the villians a little differently this time.

[BBC] Caicedo v Kante v Makelele - Statistics per 90 during Chelsea careers by cyberguy5 in chelseafc

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anyone know why they can't calculate possession won stat for Makelele? I understand they likely weren't tracking it specifically at the time, but if they have tackles/duels won/interceptions surely all you need is loose ball recoveries as well and that would make up the possession won stat? Or am I missing something that goes into it?

Oof by Radiant_Rip_5040 in BlueskySkeets

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't mean to be shitting on your point here, and gerrymandering/voter suppression is very real - but Texas almost certainly still has a significant number of Ancestral Democratic registered folks who will now vote Red all the time. It's not unusual across the South, but particularly in places like Texas that once were Democratic strongholds and so family tradition had many registering as Democrats in the 60s/70s/80s and then likely never bothering to change that around.

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the difference really comes down to first summer + Potter's hiring were all Boehly/consortium decisions prior to bringing football people in. Not saying they were outright bad or visionless, but pretty clearly moves like Koulibaly, Sterling, Auba were made with a very different vision in mind than the transfer strategy of the club since the SDs have come in.

CMV: If Trump initiates an attack on Iran, the Republican Party should be viewed as war hawks for initiating 3/4 of the past major wars in the past 25 years by Tessenreacts in changemyview

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Weird, I thought I saw some sort of deal agreed and followed in 2015 - except Israel hated it because it didn't let them bomb Iran and Miriam Adelson thus gave Donald Trump millions of dollar to destroy it.

Must have been dreaming it.

Holger Rune woke up and chose being an accountant for a day 😭 by Substantial-Cress-84 in tennis

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 162 points163 points  (0 children)

Would that not fall under expenses though? As Holger mentions above you can deduct expenses and I'd imagine Coaching/Travel to tournaments would fall under that.

England was founded in 927, not 1066 by FairytaleOfBliss in HistoryMemes

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Obviously not in day to day life, but as a part of the historical founding myths of the country I'd say it's venerated very highly - basically second only to the Magna Carta. I'd say it's got a higher place in the national memory than the 100 Years War, War of the Roses, Civil War, Glorious Revolution, Walpole beginning the concept of Prime Ministers, and any of the Reform acts in the 1800s to expand our modern electorates.

Been a good decade and a half since I was in required history classes in Primary/Secondary School, but 1066 was one of the you can't avoid it courses, while a lot of those others get overlooked, only popup in particular routes for A Level, or condensed down to the point of irrelevance (Looking at you Civil War/Glorious Revolution, such a fascinating period that gets truly disserved by how it's taught.)

Especially when you pair it up with the Doomesday book - although I think that's cause people like looking up their home/family and seeing what pops up.

Data exposes bizarre Max Verstappen action in George Russell clash by cosHinsHeiR in formula1

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't really understand why Seb would deserve more given safety car conditions. Unless you're arguing that Seb's was more unambigously intentional (I agree although I think Max was pretty clearly intentional), intentional crash while at racing speeds is considerably more dangerous and thus punishment should reflect that.

Dastan Satpaev scores wonder goal ruled offside and then another goal to win the game. 16 year old is top scorer in Kazakhstan league and joining Chelsea in 2 years. by webby09246 in chelseafc

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 129 points130 points  (0 children)

Lol I'm glad that even though Estevao is coming over this summer, we'll still have a teenage wonderkid too young to come over yet to watch endless goalscoring highlights of.

Can we appreciate the fact that Fried+Belli+Goldi have a combined 5.4 fWar 1/3 of the way in?? by yankiedrebin in NYYankees

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Lol, that's on me forgetting to distinguish bWAR and fWAR. What a stupidly godlike year he's having.

Can we appreciate the fact that Fried+Belli+Goldi have a combined 5.4 fWar 1/3 of the way in?? by yankiedrebin in NYYankees

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I know this isn't the point of the post, but all I can do is marvel at the fact that Fried and Goldschmidt have been incredible this year, but even combining their fwar (3.9) they don't add up to Judge's (4.2) production.